-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Now, I like you as the new owner more than these other guys who want to be. So my vote goes to you.
It can't be me because I can't accept ownership anonymously
Remybrown is regularly, Wylted too.Shila was a blatant case.
Even experienced coders like myself could make a syntax error. And then the whole site's functionality crashes.
ADreamOfLiberty is NOT the person for the job
We The Community, have already spoken out and decided against it.
Shila didn't talk about raping, killing, pushing strollers into traffic, stomping on babies, and other really delightful things.
I thought he moved to Finland or Norway. I wonder if he got deported back to Russia.
[Sungod / Korea] But you can make new site if you have code?
[A rat man] Checkmate.
She said similar but aimed specifically at Jews and the Holocaust.
No I can't do that either
I believe we should be able to talk about the Holocaust. Her comments were neither stupid nor uneducated. She isn't Dan Bilzerian.
The Lord is with me. I am his servant. He shall bring all to their knees. We shall be saved. Have faith.
Adaptable is incorporating my suggestion about wiping the site clean and starting over from a blank slate, and being stricter with the new policies.
You do not have many users. How is becoming stricter going to help your site be active?
Best Korea stuff
If you repeat her comments and agree with them, there will be consequences that start with posting privileges removed for some time, I presume.
You do not have many users. How is becoming stricter going to help your site be active?
Cite it.Agreeing with Holocaust apologetics is bannable.
My logic is full algorithm reset, with more global access to a broader demographic.
Agreeing with Holocaust apologetics is bannable. At minimum warnable. Let us steer clear of that topic.
Here is the policy for those who don't want to open an Evernote linkDebateArt.com Moderation PolicyDebateArt.com is committed to promoting an environment where users can engage in open and thoughtful debate on any topic, no matter how controversial or offensive it may be. Our moderation policy is designed to encourage free speech while ensuring that all users are treated with dignity and that our community remains safe and constructive.Respect for other usersUsers must treat other users with reasonable respect, and refrain from personal attacks/insults with the purpose of causing harm to another user. We do not tolerate any form of harassment, bullying, or threats of violence. All users are encouraged to engage in productive and respectful debates, even if they disagree with the opinions of others.Constructive debateUsers are encouraged to present well-reasoned arguments and avoid logical fallacies. We do not permit the worst forms of trolling, such as spamming, posting irrelevant or inflammatory content, or engaging in personal attacks. However, we do allow more borderline forms of trolling that are intended to provoke thought or stimulate debate, as long as they are presented in a respectful and thoughtful manner.No plagiarism or cheatingUsers must write their own arguments and not copy or plagiarize content from other sources. Cheating, such as using multiple accounts or vote manipulation, is strictly prohibited.Doxxing and impersonationDoxxing (the posting of personal information of others without their consent) and impersonation (pretending to be someone else) are strictly prohibited on DebateArt.com. This includes impersonating the site owner, moderators, or other users.Extravagant lies, not to be confused with mere context issues, may rise to the level of constituting impersonation.Renaming of threads or debate titlesModerators have the right to rename a thread or debate title if it is deemed to be offensive or inappropriate. This includes any title or thread that is harmful or offensive to a particular individual or group.Reporting violationsUsers are encouraged to report any violations of our policies or guidelines to the moderators, who will investigate and take appropriate action. Please include specific details and evidence to help us address the issue quickly and fairly.Moderator actionsIf a user is found to have violated our policies, the moderators may take a range of actions, including issuing warnings, suspending or banning accounts, removing content, or renaming threads or debate titles. Our goal is to maintain a dignified and constructive community for all users, while also promoting free expression and constructive debate.By using DebateArt.com, you agree to comply with our moderation policy and any updates or changes to it. We reserve the right to modify our policies at any time to ensure the continued safety and integrity of our platform.
I’ll vote yay.I think it’s worth overhauling moderation policy in some ways and I’ve seen a lot of progress and community interaction with these potential changes. As for whether this gives moderation more power or access, honestly, I don’t see how that’s the case. Mod discretion has always been integral to the existing policy, and if the goal here is to restrict how we can act in meaningful ways, then changes can be made if they get enough support. This is a good start that can yield other changes.