Trump was prosecuted for committing obvious and serious crimes. Why is that concept so difficult for you?
Like an accounting error made by his attorney? Did you ever see the legal loop holes they had to jump through to define that as illegal?
Or because somebody thinks he inflated the value of Mar-A-Largo and believes it's only worth 500k in real life or something?
Not only are these not real crimes but we don't even go after presidents when they do commit real crimes like when Bill Clinton raped multiple women. There's no mug shot of Bill Clinton. You know damn well he wouldn't be prosecuted if he never ran for president and you know he wouldn't be prosecuted if he ran as a Democrat. Your a liar if you are claiming he would.
When you see a black man getting arrested, does that qualify to you as evidence to you if racism?
Let's say we basically have a policy where we are not arresting black men and then one black men becomes very unpopular with the liberal elite and he randomly gets arrested for some stupid shit than it would look to me like it's evidence of somebody being a fascist looking to shut down dissent like Hitler did.
---------
Do you not see what is happening in Romania with a politician who won but was populist so was banned from the election? Do you not see what's happening in Germany where they are looking to ban a party for being too popular but also populist? Or in the Philippines where they looked to arrest a former president something also unheard of there who happened to be very popular and conservative?
If you are honestly too stupid or evil to address this pattern on the left than you need to take nootropics.
I don't care whether you agree with what happened or disagree with it, to not recognize this pattern and address it when pointed out is low IQ.
Let me see if I was a leftist and I have a high IQ how would I address this?
I would say, that the populist right is a threat to the current world order which has served us well so yes these prosecutions are politically motivated and yes they wouldn't happen to a more elitest candidate like a Bush or an Obama but that's because those people aren't rot that could easily destroy a pretty good system.
Hell if I was a more elitest liberal my argument might look like the following
------------+---
These types such as Trump represent a revolutionary force despite controlling the government at the moment. If you are going to challenge the system than don't be surprised when it finds ways to defend itself. It's just the white blood cells testing if you really want change and if there is enough popular support behind it
The fact you really can't see patterns or you think of everything within a pattern as a single event and just assume what the news tells you isn't a sign of a high IQ and you really shouldn't be doing your own thinking here. If you are going to vote Democrat and harm society fine, but you shouldn't be discussing politics ever, with anyone because you don't have the mental bandwidth to really understand anything related to it as evidenced that I barely tried and already came up with better challenges to my position than you could have. You wouldn't survive the arena bro.
