Trump was prosecuted for committing obvious and serious crimes. Why is that concept so difficult for you?
Like an accounting error made by his attorney? Did you ever see the legal loop holes they had to jump through to define that as illegal?
I am well aware of the case, it was not an accounting error. The whole point of the trial is to prove that Trump was in fact guilty of the crime alleged, and they did.
The thread is here. Feel free to chime in if you actually care about something beyond surface level talking points.
It starts there with post 245 when Thett chimed in, IMHO he was the best challenger I dealt with in that thread.
But all that aside, let's not forget what we're actually talking about. I would be perfectly fine reviving that thread because people like you are just plain wrong there and I'll prove that ten times over. But the claim here is that the Biden administration weaponized the justice department. This is not the Biden DOJ, this is a state prosector prosecuting a state crime, which is totally irrelevant to that.
Or because somebody thinks he inflated the value of Mar-A-Largo and believes it's only worth 500k in real life or something?
He did, that's a fact. Investors are given a certain amount of leeway on determinations of value, this went way beyond that. Taking a 5 mile drive and calling it ten is understandable. Calling it a 75 mile drive, when you drive for a living, is just lying.
And again btw... State charges filled by state officials. Still nothing to do with the DOJ.
Not only are these not real crimes but we don't even go after presidents when they do commit real crimes like when Bill Clinton raped multiple women. There's no mug shot of Bill Clinton.
Trump has 26 accusers. Still no mug shot for that either.
You know damn well he wouldn't be prosecuted if he never ran for president
Well first of all, the one crime he was convicted for was about influencing his own election, the rest of his criminal charges are all directly related to his actions as president. So saying he would have never gotten convicted had he not run is tautology, aka meaningless.
But with regards to the rest, yeah you're probably right. As I have pointed out to you before and gotten nothing but crickets back, some people do commit crimes and get away with it. But when you run for president, people pay attention to what you've done with your life. Kind of hard for a prosector to look the other way when your crimes are detailed on the front page of the NY Times.
That's common sense, no conspiracy theory needed.
When you see a black man getting arrested, does that qualify to you as evidence to you if racism?
Let's say we basically have a policy where we are not arresting black men and then one black men becomes very unpopular with the liberal elite and he randomly gets arrested for...
First off all, you ignored the question. Is a black man getting arrested evidence of racism? Yes or No?
Second, there is no policy that says we're not arresting black men (president's). There is apprehension about it because that's basic human nature, but that doesn't mean we let them do whatever they want.
Third, it wasn't random. Like I said before, the best criminal charge you can argue against is the one where his attorney did three years in jail for a crime he committed "in coordination with and at the direction of" Donald Trump. You cannot seriously tell me you think it's ok for someone to go to jail for committing a crime but not the guy who told him to do it and worked with him to carry it out, all because that guy is a former president.
Do you not see what is happening in Romania
Not really. I don't pay that close attention to international affairs, I've learned that with people like you it's rarely if ever what you say it is, and most importantly whatever left wing politicians in other countries are doing has no relevance to the fact that Trump is weaponizing the DOJ while Joe Biden did not.
