Alright, so 3 pages, but not too much content to cover. Looks like there was a lot of discussion around blacklisting (I'll say straight up that I agree with Mikal and Casey on this front - I think disagreements over strategy and SOP should not be a basis for removing someone from all future games), some discussion of how AR should approach this game based on his own questions (not a lot to say in response to those questions, since they will largely depend on how he wants to play the game and how well he can rally support for a lynch).
Mikal has claimed Clementine Ford and, after some digging, this does indeed appear to be the woman from Australia who tweeted such gems as “kill all men,” men should be “shot into the sun,” and that Covid wasn’t “killing men fast enough.” Delightful, certainly seems like it merits the Hated label. I hadn't heard of her either. Good news that it sunsets at MYLO/LYLO apparently (if I read Mikal's later response right), so at least it doesn't allow scum to effectively end the game early. He would have had to pull this claim together very quickly and be pretty ballsy to risk a CC to do it, so I do think he's more likely town.
I like seeing all the various theme split ideas from Casey, though I'm going to exercise caution in how far we apply them. It's been a while since I've gone down the theme split rabbit hole, but it often got me lost in the weeds and had me ignoring behavioral reads. There might be some basis for pursuing softclaims as well, but I'm hesitant to narrow the field of character claims early.
As for whether there are fake claims in this game, that depends on Pie's influence. He tends to like to give scum two character and two role claims (as I've been doing in my games), so that may be the case here. Savant may have gone his own way with that part of the setup. Regardless, I don't see them looking at the last game and thinking that the absence of any fake claims for scum was a good idea, so I'm guessing they have something in place.