There is no way you can prove God existing. You are assuming God exists because if you did have proof you would be able to show it to me. I am not asking much just simply any observable evidence but you can't even do that. You say I deny what you say but you don't say anything apart from God is truth or supreme being without explaining how it is the case.God is in everything so much as that something cannot exist unless it exists in truth.
God is not a concept. We use a concept to talk about God.
God is The Ultimate Reality.
The concept is like unto the fleshly nature of The Son. That which the concept points to is like unto the divine nature of The Son. 2 natures united in this single hypostasis or person of The Trinity.
I don't have to prove that The Truth exists.The Truth is God.The Ultimate Reality.
You are not talking about my God.
There is no debate about the existence of God.
I have a reasonable standard to base that upon. Your standard is assumptions because you can't explain your side which is clear by your posts.You assume God doesn't exist, and that is why you are struggling.
There is no debate about the existence of God. The Ultimate Reality either exists or there is no reality.
How do you think he got to a stage of thinking like that?He simply has two interchangeable definitions for god which he is unable or unwilling to separate in his mind (or at least in his arguments).
Do you think someone like him can be changed?Indoctrination. By being told that a true believer does not need proof and that scientific knowledge is inferior to faith until he really believed it.
Do you think someone like him can be changed?
That will never happen. Isn't that obvious? Haven't you guys figured out how utterly disappointing this site is, how bad it's run and there are only a handful of folks who can speak without their jaws slacking? There are way better forums out there, this one is pathetic.I think he needs to clearly lay out his standard for believing this
I don't think you can say that. People change their mind and all we would have to do is found out how this happens.Of course not. Trolls are trolls, they don't change.
It's funny that Mo is your best candidate here, that he is the best this place can offer. Ever figure out why?*hint*Trolls are welcome here, sane people are not.
Where and if there was why are you here?That will never happen. Isn't that obvious? Haven't you guys figured out how utterly disappointing this site is, how bad it's run and there are only a handful of folks who can speak without their jaws slacking? There are way better forums out there, this one is pathetic.
You're absolutely free to continue banging your head against a stone wall and find out for yourself. But, wouldn't you rather be on a forum that has no trolls and instead folks who can discuss things intelligently? Your call.I don't think you can say that.
Best candidate to speak about Christianity
Trolls are not welcome because there is moderation.
Type1 got banned and I remember polytheistic-witch got banned as well.
I think he is not a troll instead genuinely believes what he says.You're absolutely free to continue banging your head against a stone wall and find out for yourself. But, wouldn't you rather be on a forum that has no trolls and instead folks who can discuss things intelligently? Your call.
Not even close, he represents the very worst of what that religion offers.
That's where you're dead wrong, they have no clue how to run a forum let alone identify the trolls who are bringing the forum down that has already caused a mass exodus of the many folks from ddo and elsewhere who could talk intelligently. They are all pretty much long gone.
You must be joking, right? Did you see how long it took for them to ban Poly? Normal, well run forums would have banned Poly within a day or two of her behaviour here, not many months after the damage was already done.
Where?I'm on other forums, I swing by here now and again to have a good chuckle at those who are still floundering with trolls like Mo. I keep wondering who here has less sense, the trolls or those who try to engage them.
You can think that if you want, but he most certainly is a troll.I think he is not a troll
genuinely believes what he says.
I don't expect good people making Religious arguments to make good arguments for it.
Have you run a forum before?
He can't do that much damage
if you think insulting people as debates is damage then you must have a low bar for it
I would consider site damage to be doxxing.
You can think that if you want, but he most certainly is a troll.
Most trolls do.
You may need to get out more to other forums where there are good people who make good arguments. This place is not one of them.
In other well run forums, people are given warnings not because they think someones post might be crazy (I have been banned here for saying exactly that), but because their posts are crazy and they must provide supporting arguments and evidence to substantiate what they say, or they eventually get banned. That's how well run forums operate. This place does the opposite, hence why good, sane people leave.
Yes, that is why I understand how well run forums operate. Those here who are in power have no understanding of this and refuse to take any advice or help on the matter. They believe they know what they're doing, which is laughable, of course.
No one said anything about insulting others. That said, folks like Mo are insulting your intelligence, your honesty and integrity. But, maybe those things aren't important for some.
That's damage to a person, not the site itself.
