Chief Mod Violation

Um, the video you linked showed a couple of guys bare asses and ended with a guy pretending (probably pretending anyway) to masturbate in the shower. That isn't really comparable to some person saying some naughty words.

See above last answer ^^^ i agree with you.  

This topic aside, I agree with goldtop in a different way. I think women should be allowed to be topless.

I will always stand against most of what Islam stands for, even in a day and age where people defend the religion calling me an Islamophobe.

You want to oppress people, degrade women, stone and maim those you call immoral? Yeah, fuck off with your ideology RIGHT NOW.

You know Halal meat is literally the single cruellest of the widespread ways to kill an animal right? Research how they treat animals and kill them by making them bleed out while completely conscious.

I don't think you realise how dangerous conservative religions like Islam and Christianity can be, they are warlike religions that led to things like the Apartheid for Christianity and much more all over the world for both.

lol

So, yeah, I am going to say that bare assess and guys drenched in fake cum counts as adult content. It's age-restricted on youtube for a reason. Men's groins and assess should be covered, and women should have their assess, groins, and breasts covered as well. I get that a lot of people are okay with bare assess, but because I cannot age-restrict content on this site, I am just going to include that to be safe.

What is the official DART Moderator Position on/

Oh... it was eggs not cum lol j/p. I understand... it's good i got that out of the way bc there were some other videos i was thinking of posting. I didn't know we had this 'adult content' rule until this thread. Live and learn.   

Right now, I am thinking that the standard ought to be something along the lines of "assess, groins, and breasts (for women) must be clearly clothed, obscured, or covered." Such a standard would permit mankinis so long as it was evident that some clothing was present. But, if the picture of the mankini was cropped such that one could not tell that the mankini was there, then it would be adult content.

This might be worth MEEPing. Honestly, the standard has never been tested before. I think there are several dimensions to this question that are important to consider, and it may take me a couple days to draft a comprehensive standard that can be put to a public vote.

Get your head of your ass you angry athiest. It is not porn. Is there a dick hanging out? No. He is clothed and no sensitive body parts are showing. The only dick I see is you