Chief Mod Violation

Author: Goldtop

Posts

Total: 70
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
If a man has his shirt off it's sexual for you the rest of us are not the problem 
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Goldtop
If you are trying to tell us that picture did not come from an adult content site, then you're obviously a bigger liar than I thought. Gay mens adult content sites are full of pics just like it, and you know it. You've stated that you're gay and that picture is clearly of a sexual nature for you because there is no other reason for you to post it as your avatar. So, rather than fabricating some pathetic excuses about beaches and department stores, tell us the real reason why you're using it?
Reverse image search tells me it comes from a model called Joepietrefesa’s Instagram page.

Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
-->
@Ramshutu
His pics are on Tumblr and other adult content sites as well. I guess I should be able to post topless female models who also happen to be on adult content sites? However, Bsh has already stated he would not allow that. Can you see the hypocrisy here?


Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Men being topless is legal and not pornography. Closet case. 
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,568
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
-->
@Ramshutu
I dont like you but I laughed
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@Goldtop
His pics are on Tumblr and other adult content sites as well. I guess I should be able to post topless female models who also happen to be on adult content sites? However, Bsh has already stated he would not allow that. Can you see the hypocrisy here?
Dude, I can show pics of leather couches from the ikea catalogue that show up on adult content sites.

keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
-->
@Ramshutu
Dude, I can show pics of leather couches from the ikea catalogue that show up on adult content sites
You go on adult sites and scope the couches?   That's plain odd.


Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@keithprosser
I go to ikea to scope the couches.
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@keithprosser
Also the meatballs.
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
I feel I should share some of Ryan Creamers Porn videos.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,052
3
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
3
3
3
-->
@Ramshutu

Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 4,228
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@keithprosser
oh yes that's some hot couches there. 
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@Goldtop
Gay mens adult content sites are full of pics just like it, and you know it.
They're also full of images of clothed men and nude men. By your logic, no one could post pictures of any human being ever. Obviously, your claim is absurd.

You've stated that you're gay and that picture is clearly of a sexual nature for you because there is no other reason for you to post it as your avatar.
The fact that I find the image attractive does not make it porn. There are two logical problems with your claim. First, by your logic, if someone posts a picture they find appealing, it's porn. What if a user has a bustle fetish? Am I, as a mod, seriously supposed to ban images of women in bustles? What if you're into leather Ikea couches? Do I then have to purge those images? Just because I find an image appealing does not mean that it's porn. The fact that I find Chris Hemsworth hot as Thor does not make the Avengers movies porn. Porn is clearly something more serious. Your proposed standard is therefore obviously and problematically over-inclusive regarding what counts as porn. Second, your proposed standard would require me to be a mind-reader. Am I as a mod seriously supposed to know  people's sexual paraphilias and interests so that I can ban images they post when those images might be a turn-on for them? A standard such as that would be practically unworkable and overly subjective.

So, rather than fabricating some pathetic excuses about beaches and department stores
I don't see how you can reasonably call something porn if, as I said, you could find it in any Macy's you walk into or in widely disseminated, PG-rated children's movies.




Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Goldtop
If you are trying to tell us that picture did not come from an adult content site, then you're obviously a bigger liar than I thought. Gay mens adult content sites are full of pics just like it, and you know it.

I'll have to take your word for it, you have obviously spent a lot more time on gay porn sites than most.

You've stated that you're gay and that picture is clearly of a sexual nature for you because there is no other reason for you to post it as your avatar.

Yeah, most gay men and straight women probably find the person in his pic attractive. That does not make it adult content because that is not what adult content means. If it did then this would be adult content because straight guys find these pics attractive


It very obviously isn't adult content. Trust me, I took my time and checked each individual one very closely to make sure, you know, because um... uhh... just to be safe?
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@keithprosser
I’d take the cushions off some of those and rummage for change... nasty boy.
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Ramshutu
I'll bet you know how to handle a recliner lever *wink*
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
Lesson learned

Spend enough time at the gym and your abs become pornographic.

bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
i bet he’s exercised a few springs.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
-->
@Mopac
This is your best post ever.
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 43
Posts: 2,768
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
-->
@bsh1
Piano stool in the streets, a chaise longue in the sheets.
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 50
Posts: 2,888
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@bsh1
Stop violating our sense of hetero-normalcy! You might be undoing years of conversation therapy!
Goldtop
Goldtop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,706
2
1
2
Goldtop's avatar
Goldtop
2
1
2
-->
@bsh1
By your logic, no one could post pictures of any human being ever.  First, by your logic, if someone posts a picture they find appealing, it's porn.   Am I, as a mod, seriously supposed to ban images of women in bustles? What if you're into leather Ikea couches?   The fact that I find Chris Hemsworth hot as Thor does not make the Avengers movies porn.   Second, your proposed standard would require me to be a mind-reader.   you could find it in any Macy's you walk into or in widely disseminated, PG-rated children's movies.
I'm not sure what posts you're reading or to whom you would be responding as that pile of steaming shit has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. Those responses are either the result of extremely poor reading and thinking comprehension skills or some of the worst strawmen and lame excuses put forth on these forums. Responding to that tripe is futile, it is just so retarded, it's like I'm talking to a five year old. But then, that's exactly the kind of responses I've come to expect from you and most others here; incoherent, unintelligible shit talk. Thinking and common sense does not exist here.


blamonkey
blamonkey's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 532
3
5
8
blamonkey's avatar
blamonkey
3
5
8
-->
@bsh1
What if a user has a bustle fetish? 
I told you not to say anything about that one time in the religion section! I mean... yeah, who would be into that, am I right?


Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Yes!!! Finally something good... no offense bsh. 

Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Ok, that is pushing it. I would consider that adult content. Obviously not porn but definitely adult content.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Yeah... but Youtube allows it... and they are censor heavy... especially when it comes to adult content. 
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
They have it age restricted. When I clicked your link it asked me to log in to verify my age.

That isn't the least bit relevant though... The relevant part is that the people in the video was neked (sic) and... not exactly trying to hide it.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Oh yeah... i've never had any restrictions on my computer so i always forget they do that. I guess you're right, it's "adult content" but def. not porn which is the point of me sharing that... even that isn't considered to be porn. Youtube would ban it if it were porn. I guess unintentionally i kinda brought about another issue we could talk about... does this sites "CoC" not allow that video? Idk... i think it should. It's funny and they are gods of their music genre.  
Discipulus_Didicit
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 5,294
3
4
10
Discipulus_Didicit's avatar
Discipulus_Didicit
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
does this sites "CoC" not allow that video?

The CoC words it as "Adult content... Including pornography"

Realistically it is up to the mods to decide whether it is to be officially considered a violation but just looking at the CoC... Yeah, that video is adult content.

Edit: Based on post 2 of this thread bsh would consider it a violation as well.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Realistically it is up to the mods to decide whether it is to be officially considered a violation but just looking at the CoC... Yeah, that video is adult content.
Well.... i can't delete it anymore so i'll find out now won't i lol. I'm confused if adult content means having to do with some kind of sexual act or activity... Bc a lot of the music we post on this site is "adult content" too... so... don't really get it. But i've posted a lot of songs that would probably be age restricted too. A lot of the metal songs i post are likely age restricted due to lyrics. So... idk.