if iran keeps enriching nuclear fuel, america should bomb them

Author: n8nrgmi ,

Posts

Total: 184
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,200
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3

i'm not saying that america should invade iran. just bomb them. if iran was stupid enough to wage a retaliatory war, they'd be blown away. after all, the usa's military is bigger than the next ten countries in the world combined, with iran puny in comparison, and the usa has thousands of nukes, which iran has none. it's clear iran is one of the largest sponsors of terrorism in the world, and given nukes, they would get worse and be able to hold the world hostage. we can't let that happen. 

iran said it's going to probably go past the limits of nuclear fuel that was set by the treaty they were in, so it's becoming clear punishment will probably be in order. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 10,816
3
4
8
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
8
I would much rather have Israel take care of this with the help of the Saudis.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,200
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
--> @Greyparrot
it's in no one's interest for iran to have a nuke, so that should involve the usa. and, a localized war might not be sufficient without the usa. i guess israel has nukes, but things might get out of hand without the usa. plus it would take only a country with balls to pull the trigger for a strike. 
Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,322
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
--> @n8nrgmi
So, are Iran and its allies justified in bombing Israel?

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 15
Posts: 4,895
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @n8nrgmi
How come The U.S.A. is allowed to enrich nuclear fuel and Iran isn't.

Who are the dictators here?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 10,816
3
4
8
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
8
--> @zedvictor4
I agree. If Iran wants to nuke Israel, let them.
n8nrgmi
n8nrgmi's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,200
3
2
3
n8nrgmi's avatar
n8nrgmi
3
2
3
--> @zedvictor4
enriching too much fuel is almost surely about getting nukes. they shouldn't be allowed a nuke. the reason, is because they are the biggest state sponsor of terrorism out there. basically, they are the bad guys. why do we not allow criminals to have guns? the same logic applies to not allowing them to have nukes. iran's leaders have talked about wiping israel off the map. we dont want to give them the capability to do so. 
Ramshutu
Ramshutu's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 1,826
6
9
10
Ramshutu's avatar
Ramshutu
6
9
10
What we need is an agreement with Iran that places strict limits on their Nuclear Capacity, and allows the west to perform detailed inspections to ensure they are in compliance with their own limits.
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,474
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
--> @zedvictor4
The US can be trusted with nukes.  Iran can't.
Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,322
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
--> @Ramshutu
As to strict limits.... What happens if Iran decides not to comply?


Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,322
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
Does Iran need nuclear weapons to annihilate Israel?
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,987
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
--> @n8nrgmi
it's in no one's interest for iran to have a nuke
False. It is in Irans interest just as it is in USA, Russial, Israel, Pakistan, France, N. Korea etc to have nuclear or hydrogen bombs.

It is humanities interest only as 'peacekeepers' from old world ways of divided nation-state existence.

A unified humanity ergo the dissolving of nation-states, there is absolutely no interest in nuclear/hydrogen bomb existence.

This is a minimal brainer for those who seek truth and rational, logical common sense.

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 15
Posts: 4,895
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @n8nrgmi
And so say you.

Which nation is responsible for the most civilian deaths and casualties worldwide due to acts of military aggression, this century?

Who are the real bully boys of the World.
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @Alec
The US can be trusted with nukes.  Iran can't.
Well, I suppose the US has some experience of using nukes.   I'm not sure that a reason to trust them, tho'.
.

Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,303
2
4
9
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
2
4
9
--> @zedvictor4
Because Iran is a threat to America and many other countries around the world. They chant "Death to America" over in Iran. They are not to be trusted with nukes.
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,303
2
4
9
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
2
4
9
--> @keithprosser
I don't think the US is going to start a war with them though, like Iran probably would.

Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,303
2
4
9
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
2
4
9
--> @Snoopy
Iran already isn't complying.
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,474
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
--> @keithprosser
We don't nuke countries anymore.  The only time we did was to end WWII.  Japan has forgiven us for it and is now a big ally to America.
Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,322
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
--> @Alec
The US can be trusted with nukes.  Iran can't.
How do you reconcile this with your assumptions accounting for the possibility of a tyrannical government in the US?
Alec
Alec's avatar
Debates: 42
Posts: 2,474
5
7
11
Alec's avatar
Alec
5
7
11
--> @Snoopy
Right now, the government isn't tyrannical, but we might in the future.  This is why we should have the right to bear arms.  If the US government were to threaten to nuke some peaceful country, the US should denuke ourselves and use the nukes for power.  But we are not in that stage yet.
mustardness
mustardness's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,987
2
2
3
mustardness's avatar
mustardness
2
2
3
--> @Alec
If the US government were to threaten to nuke some peaceful country, the US should denuke ourselves and use the nukes for power.
There is a peaceful country on Earth?  USA is not a peacful country ergo in your scenario it would be fine { valid } if any country with nuclear bombs to nuke USA.  Your a very confused person.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
False. It is in Irans interest just as it is in USA, Russia, Israel, Pakistan, France, N. Korea etc to have nuclear or hydrogen bombs.

It is humanities interest only as 'peacekeepers' from old world ways of divided nation-state existence.

A unified humanity ergo the dissolving of nation-states, there is absolutely no interest in nuclear/hydrogen bomb existence.

This is a minimal brainer for those who seek truth and rational, logical common sense.



Snoopy
Snoopy's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,322
2
2
4
Snoopy's avatar
Snoopy
2
2
4
--> @mustardness
Japan and Switzerland come to mind
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 9,351
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
--> @n8nrgmi
I actually agree. Wow
keithprosser
keithprosser's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,053
2
3
3
keithprosser's avatar
keithprosser
2
3
3
--> @n8nrgmi
i'm not saying that america should invade iran. just bomb them.
The Iranian population is 81 million.  The number of people who run things in iran is nearer 81 people than 81 million... and those 81 people are the ones with a nuclear bunker, not the 81M ordinary iranians.   If the destruction of 13 times as many innocent lives as the holocaust is a solution to a problem, it must be a bigger problem than this appears to be.






zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 15
Posts: 4,895
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @Mharman
I think that it is fair to say that U.S. paranoia, has been the biggest threat to World peace since WW2.