-->
@Mharman
Are you sure it's as low as 90%?
It's not like the media are not even trying anymore to hide their socialist/globalist agenda for America.
Little socialist soldiers straight from the boot camps of marxist universities.
Conservitards Overwhelming Need To Kill
Posts
Total:
77
pollywanna
Your ignorance of both socialism and marxism defines the American education system. It's no wonder the world laughs at you but especially now that you produced a leader who epitomises the really pathetic state of your "education" system.
The USI the united states of ignorance.
-->
@disgusted
Maduro knows how to keep socialists in their place. With a gun.
EU is furious America does not want to purchase the marxist socialism they are peddling. Most of the rich EU job creators have already migrated over to America, one of the few remaining safe nations for job creators.
I doubt your ignorance could plummet to lower depths, but I'm always hopeful when dealing with our poor yankee cousins, much like our bonobo cousins only dumber.
Guns.
We'en have evry rite to kilt skool kidins cos ar bill of rites sayes so. Killen kids is as muurikan as it gets and we got the god given rite to do so. Our'n god is a murdrin god like us'n.
-->
@disgusted
You want more sources? I have more.
-->
@disgusted
Americans only kill socialist kids before they grow up to be Authoritarians willing to use government guns to rob people for producing too much.
-->
@Mharman
The quality of your sources has been exposed so don't bother
-->
@disgusted
You don’t even know what sources I’m going to use. The only thing exposed here is your confirmation bias.
-->
@Mharman
You provided a godist site as your source, that is the quality of your sources, fairy tale defenders. No thanks.
-->
@disgusted
Again, you don’t know what sources I’m going to use but you seem to act like you do anyways.
-->
@disgusted
Obviously you don’t want to have an actual debate. So let me ask you a question: Do you believe that lethal force is ever necessary?
-->
@Mharman
Again I've seen your godist source and they don't count in intelligent conversation. Keep them for the unintelligent godists.
-->
@disgusted
So basically you prematurely conclude that all of my sources are bad based on one of my sources.
-->
@Mharman
Only if you are killing school children, ooh look I may be American.
-->
@disgusted
What if you were attacked by a knife-wielding man and you can’t escape him? Is lethal force necessary there?
-->
@Mharman
Read post #46.
-->
@disgusted
What if the man is attacking you instead of children? Would you be willing to use lethal force to defend yourself?
-->
@Mharman
comprehend
-->
@Mharman
What if the man is attacking you instead of children? Would you be willing to use lethal force to defend yourself?
Why a man and not a more generalized person?
Attacking with words, stones, knifes, bullets, atomic bomb?
Are their innocent people in the area?
What are the weapon options ---lethal and non-lethal-- available to me in this scenario?
Am I asleep, at breakfest, driving in my car attempting to escape someone else who appears to be chasing me?
Are their places to hide options available to me?
What are the circumstances for this person to be attacking me in the first place?
Do I have a cell phone to call emergency number?
Is this person smaller or larger than me?
Does this person appear to be mental crazed or just pissed off me for cause said something inappropriate?
Do I think I can out run this person on foot or in my vehicle?
hicle?
-->
@mustardness
Am I pregnant?
-->
@DBlaze
Yes
-->
@DBlaze
Am I pregnant?
With twins?
Triplets?
Quadrulpets?
Is the person attacking me pregnant if so can I judge their weight and to bettern judge and attempt to outrun them?
Do they hae on running shoes?
What am I wearing? Flips flops wont do well in foot race.
-->
@mustardness
I say triplets
-->
@mustardness
Why a man and not a more generalized person?
Doesn't really matter, I just said "man" because statistically men are more likely to attack someone than women are.
Attacking with words, stones, knifes, bullets, atomic bomb?
A) You are the killer's only target
B) He is attacking you with a physical object and is able to kill you with it
Are their innocent people in the area?
No.
What are the weapon options ---lethal and non-lethal-- available to me in this scenario?
Anything that can be used to kill.
Am I asleep, at breakfast, driving in my car attempting to escape someone else who appears to be chasing me?
Doesn't matter. All that matters is that he is trying to kill you and will do so if you don't kill him first.
Are their places to hide options available to me?
No.
What are the circumstances for this person to be attacking me in the first place?
Doesn't matter. All that matters is that he is trying to kill you and will do so if you don't kill him first.
Do I have a cell phone to call emergency number?
You could, but it's irrelevant since this is a kill-or-be-killed scenario.
Is this person smaller or larger than me?
This person is capable of killing you.
Does this person appear to be mental crazed or just pissed off me for cause said something inappropriate?
You are innocent.
Do I think I can out run this person on foot or in my vehicle?
No.
It comes down to this: You either kill the guy attempting to kill you, or the he kills you.
-->
@Mharman
It comes down to this: You either kill the guy attempting to kill you, or the he kills you.
I think that is very narrow set of parameters that considering 7 billion people on Earth does not occur very often.
I.e. it is rare if not very often that all of the factors I mentioned may come into play in any individuals considered set of options.
If and when such a time ever really occurs, ---in stead of your iffy hypothetical-- I and others an only consider what are the options available to us at the time. And one option is for any person to, freeze mentally and emotionally and do nothing.
You want to make it a go, no-go scenario and that is rare case for most people on Earth and few not what they will actually do. Including the person you say is initiating the intent to kill i.e. based on another response they could change their mind to some other option.
You need to broaden your set of considerations and know that anything is possible in reality as long as it does not violate eternally existent inviolate laws/principles.
-->
@mustardness
I'm simply just asking if you believe in self defense.
-->
@Mharman
#56--- You either kill the guy attempting to kill you, or the he kills you. #58--I'm simply just asking if you believe in self defense.
The former part in above comment shows that you latter apart is false aka not true, in your past posts.
Killing some another person is just one of many options in hypothetical, and I will continue to repeat to you, no one knows what they will do in reality cause reality is not a hypothecal set of yes or no, black or white etc, that you want the all people on Earth to fall into.
I recall how in mid or late 60's how movies where the good and bad were becoming more blurred i.e. the complexity of life potential scenarios are and have become more complicated.
Once somebody was at my front door and threaten to beat me senseless and I talked them out of it.
Once somebody hit me in the jaw I and I yelled at them to get out of my yard.
Once somebody snapped the end of towel at my face and I put my out in front of my face to protect myself.
Being non-violent in WW 2 would have been very difficult for most people. I dunno what I would have done. It is hypothetical and not a reality that I'm facing.
-->
@Mharman
Do you believe that women have bodily autonomy or do you believe woman deserve to be raped?