EVOLUTION VS CREATION IS USELESS

Topic's posts
Posts in total: 71
Think about it, both sides has access to the same evidence,facts, and statistics. If the evidence in the world from Biology,Astronomy, Geology,Envioremtal Science the SAME. Then it ultimately comes up to belief.
--> @Dr.Franklin
It's just a matter of perception and perspective. So yes, it's a matter of "belief" or perception when it comes to perceiving or interpreting the evidences. I've been saying this the whole time, and why I tell materialists and atheists to consider the nature of energy and how it operates in creation. It's the nature of energy that shows the nature of God (consciousness) and creation, energy exists because of conscious activity, conscious activity produces energy. That's why you see energy acting as intelligence in creation because it's activated by intelligence, energy is manipulated by a conscious reality. 
--> @EtrnlVw
Yup,astronomy and the study of space is facts, fact is that the moon takes X amount of time to orbit the Earth, interpretintating this fact is the divide
--> @Dr.Franklin
Interpretation is everything, it's what separates the men from the boyz lol. 
--> @EtrnlVw
Very true
--> @Dr.Franklin
No, it's a case of who can best analyze the evidence. The thing is, evolutionary theory is so rife with inconsistency and contradiction that those who spout its nonsense are likely to be either liars or fools. So by all logic, the answer should always default to creationism. The problem is that there's a deep ingrained delusion within those who believe in evolution, such that even when you provide them with hard evidence from passages within the bible, they're still unable to accept the clear fact that evolution is false
--> @dustryder
I dont sense your being serious
--> @Dr.Franklin
Your cynicism is noted, however my faith remains unwavering. You will not lead me to damnation, sinner
--> @dustryder
Your an atheist
--> @Dr.Franklin
Nah. Between atheism and christianity, only christianity offers salvation. It's a clear choice for me.

Frankly, your assertions otherwise are offensive and unchristlike



--> @dustryder
I don't think so
--> @Dr.Franklin
“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. - Matthew 7:1-5



--> @dustryder
A spiritualist? 
An agnostic?

--> @dustryder
ooohhhhhh very bad no no
24 days later
--> @Dr.Franklin
You can say that about any subject then. Everyone can find the same facts and or evidence but no people on the stages believe the same exact thing.

It also matters what you've learned.
--> @Dr.Franklin
Do you understand how a car engine works?
--> @Dr.Franklin
You could say the same thing about t flat earth vs round earth, or evil spirits rather than germs as a cause of disease,  Both sides have access to the same set of facts. It's just a matter of interpretation, right?

Obviously, some interpretations are more reasonable than others. When one side routinely commits logical fallacies, as creationism does,  it is a good indication that it is the less reasonable  interretation.
--> @Dr.Franklin
Think about it, both sides has access to the same evidence,facts, and statistics. If the evidence in the world from Biology,Astronomy, Geology,Envioremtal Science the SAME. Then it ultimately comes up to belief.
And you, sir--as the kids say--have won the internet. Creation is a means to rationalize the origin of man; Evolution is a means to rationalize the origin of man. It's not that one set of information is more "reasonable" than the other; It's about which information, rationalization, interpretation holds more value to the observer. And it can as simple as maintaining a belief. (#epistemologicalsolipsism.) Those who pervert logic, being oblivious to its form, misuse reason as a means to trivialize the other ideology. But it's only a trite attempt to elevate one's own belief to some objective evaluation while diminishing the other.
--> @Athias
ok 
--> @A-R-O-S-E
Yup, that's Politics
--> @Paul
Yes
--> @Stronn
ok 
--> @Dr.Franklin
Do you believe it or do you understand it?

--> @Paul
You dont believe in an egine
--> @Dr.Franklin
so not using periods a time saving simplification thing? i'm not knocking you I'm all for going all lower case but periods could be tricky.