In this debate:
billbatard vote bombed in my favor whereas Ragnar vote bombed in WaterPhoenix's favor. Ragnar stated his reason that there was 3 hours left and decided to change his vote because he thought moderators won't be fast enough to remove it.
Quote: "CVB bill.
I would not do this, but 6 hours left, so no guarantee any moderator will be on."
The only vote was RationalMadman which didn't even cover every single Round.
Meaning this entire debate was voted on things which would normally get removed.
See this comment to see why RM's vote would be rejected:
Highlight: "The voter does not appear to sufficiently survey the main arguments or counter arguments of the debate and weigh them to make a decision. While the voter references some arguments - it is unclear why one set of arguments were not sufficient to over turn the other (only statements that they were)."
I don't think I need to show evidence that CVB or what billbatard did is not allowed so I will leave it at that.
My suggestion is that the moderators are able to take down votes when the debate is finished or simply extend the deadline given this extreme circumstance. I have already stated this but nothing has happened. Guess this must be the definition of insanity expecting a different response for the same question.