The Solution To Poverty?

Money is representative of an asset that belongs to someone. 

Your concept of injecting units into the system 

I am not suggesting injecting units into the system.

[Money] is not something that arises from imagination or on a computer screen.

Inflation is not perception. 

I think it is fraught with problems - personally.

Zzzzzzz

The only way you can achieve the wealth distribution you desire is by incredibly heavy-handed government intervention in the marketplace, which in the end results in everyone being poorer.

>< is representative of dumb-bell geometric path that will lead to demise of humanity. Trumpanzees are in denial of the most simple truths.

<> is a representative of a octahedral ergo fat { girth } aka middle class for all of humanity and not your narrow concept of one nation with a set of 200 or more on Earth.

First of all,  there has to be voluntary desire by global humanity to see truth state of world and motivated to unify regarding dong something about that state of the world.

2nd step and so and so on.

The alternative options is the one that traditional pathway and that is one or more states, force global humanity to see truth, and address the state of the world involuntarily.

Trumpanzees make the 2nd option more likely one to occur. Sad :--( as that is butt forward into the future.

Option #1 is mind/intellect/concepts forward into the future.

Either option may prevail and humanity survives beyond a 500 -1000 years from now, but at what costs of suffering and misery.


Ghandi---there is enough for every ones need,  not everyones greed... and that comment was made in 1930's or 40's., or so Ive read.

Trumpanzees chant is so narrowed minded...make america great again!.....

I do, however, know when a proposed system is pie-in-the-sky.

I think if that was done,  the cost of milk would hit 20 dollars. And gas 100 a gallon.

The ability to buy goods would create shortages and price would adjust accordingly.

There is a reason poverty exists, and I doubt it has much to income.

Something is only worth as much time as you are willing to put in.    Not sure what all would go down but I'd trade for tangible assets as soon as possible, and a beer.  

I'd assume that it would ultimately benefit the upper class in a position to take advantage in the changing times and screw everyone else.

 It would have been benevolent to make your currency out of a nationally owned commodity or something.

That would defeat the purpose of the exercise. Done that way, inflation would have immediately set in and there would be no way to show to people that it was only in their heads.

Prices would spiral out of control and the IOU's would become worthless. Worse, it would have a similar effect on the old money supply and wreck the country's GDP.

The middle class is moving to under the poverty line and the richest get richer. I know.

Is there a solution to the dichotomy? I think so. I think it is in a fundamental shift in mentality and the adequate removal of greed and social-economic desires for cheap labor and cheaply made easy disposable products.

What have you done to bring such a world about?

Is standing on a street corner shouting messages of doom aided the pendulum of change to swing to towards paradise?

Work combined with fiscal and personal  responsibility is the solution to poverty. Every single person without exception who is not poor practices all three.

1} metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/conceptual work,

2} muscle work.

So you are saying the solution to poverty is not eliminating poverty?

I suppose we could make everyone poor like Venezuela

No. I'm saying that the only way to COMPLETELY eliminate poverty is NOT with enforced labour.

But you would have to do that as unproductive people will always have less money than productive people; otherwise productive people would rarely volunteer to work harder than unproductive people, and the ones that did volunteer would never work as hard as the could if they were compensated fairly for their efforts. That's the reason why socialism leads to economic ruin in the quest of using wealth redistribution to eliminate poverty rather than enforcing productivity.

As long as there is a wealth gap, a "poverty line" will always be established, no matter how much wealth the unproductive people have.

In order to equalize wealth you would have to enforce productivity.

In order to eliminate poverty you would have to establish workfarms for the poor like England did, which was extremely successful at culling the unproductive poor from society at a barbaric cost.