At conception, a living cell combines with another living cell and their dna is mixed together and the hybrid cells begin to multiply.
I believe the real question is, "at what point is it anyone else's (other than the mother's) business or concern?"
I think he was using US as an example not some 3rd world country. Can you demonstrate most immigrants don't have birth certificates? The reason I stated most is that it is unfair to have this as an argument when it is not correct for most immigrants.many immigrants don't have or can't produce a birth certificate....then again at one time there was no such thing so....
Are you saying life begins at conception?
I believe the real question is, "at what point is it anyone else's (other than the mother's) business or concern?"This is under the axiom we ought to care about a choice of a mother over a life right?
If you call the police and you can't prove you're a citizen, you may be detained.doesn't negate the point that just because someone doesn't have a birth certificate doesn't mean they don't still have rights, that better for you now?
I meant human life. When does it start?Life begins BEFORE conception.
Why ought we care about a choice a mother makes within her own private sovereign territory?
some how's that?doesn't negate the point that just because someone doesn't have a birth certificate doesn't mean they don't still have rights, that better for you now?
If you call the police and you can't prove you're a citizen, you may be detained.Only citizens are protected by the law.
I don't know what you are saying here. Are you agreeing that saying just immigrants leaves you open to people simply make up if it is a lot or not?it was an over exaggeration, how about refugees, how many of them have i.d. and or birth certificates? illegals crossing the border?
Yes but that doesn't address what I just realized that you said "many immigrants" don't have birth certificates. Do you have that as a percentage or per 1,000 or something?the number/amount is irrelevant to the point of whether someone does or does not need a birth certificate to have rights.
Life begins BEFORE conception.I meant human life. When does it start?
Why ought we care about a choice a mother makes within her own private sovereign territory?You are just dodging the question and instead returning one to me. You haven't stated the problem with my question so do you want to state the problem with my question or answer it?
This is under the axiom we ought to care about a choice of a mother over a life right?
Only citizens are protected by the law.naw, you still have the right to remain silent, a right to an attorney etc etc you have to fight, for your right, to ppaaarrrtttaaayyyy!
The sperm is 100% human and 100% alive.The egg is also 100% human and 100% alive.
No. Like all moral theory, it's a simple matter of jurisdiction.
How did you get this conclusion?The sperm is 100% human and 100% alive.The egg is also 100% human and 100% alive.
No. Like all moral theory, it's a simple matter of jurisdiction.
The sperm is 100% human and 100% alive.The egg is also 100% human and 100% alive.How did you get this conclusion?
What are you defining a human to be as?Human cells.
What are you defining a human to be as?
What is human cells?Anything that is living and comprised of 100% human cells.
What is human cells?
So a chopped arm is a human?Cells that are part of (or grown from cells that were at one point part of) a human.
So a chopped arm is a human?
So a human is still a human even if it is dead?A chopped off human arm is 100% human but not alive.
Anything that is living and comprised of 100% human cells.
Take a biopsy of the object in question.What standard are you using to declare a thing having 100% human cells?
I'd say "bestowed" upon issuance of a birth certificate.
What is a human sperm made out of?Human cells.100% human cells.Is a human sperm alive?A human sperm can die, ipso-facto, it is alive if it isn't dead.I'm not really sure how much more I can try and simplify this.Please let me know if you have any questions.
What is the source of the raw material that they zygote utilizes?Yes, but a zygote has its own distinct human genome, where as a sperm cell shares its genome with its emitter. You can then argue that the sperm cell is merely an extension of its emitter, much like a finger, or an internal organ. The same cannot be said for the zygote.
