since this is the 2nd time you've said this and I asked you to show where I said any such thing and you didn't because you can't because I never said anything like that, I view you as a liar.
I laid out what I interpreted your argument to be and why the logical extension of that is that you want poor people to die. if I have misunderstood then please lay out precisely what it is you are advocating for.
you could sponsor 1 child or add to what is already donated to "resolve the problem" of a few people. guess it's an all or nothing thing for you.
I could, but the system would still be broken. thousands, if not millions, of other children would not get help. I believe we should deal with the entire problem. Why would I advocate for only helping a tiny percentage of children when I can advocate for helping all of them?
LOL yeah I hear they've been doing a great job with the V.A. and medicare, they do deserve the whole thing from doing such a good job with those.
Those programs were fundamentally flawed. They weren't based on the concept that healthcare is a right. They were based on the idea that poor people can have some charity. Welfare programs are very easy to cut and undermine because most people don't care about them because most people don't benefit from them. But if you make it a program that affects every single american, it is extremely difficult to cut it or undermine it because you are directly harming all of your voters. That is one of the reasons why medicare for all is a much better plan.
I've long advocated in many, many threads that the system needs to be fix,changes made etc, most of which means LESS government.
Like what? there is no organization that is willing to help everyone other than the government. Companies exist to profit. There is no profit in helping sick people who don't have money. You will never find a privatized system that will help everyone. If you want everyone to get healthcare, I do not believe there is any alternative to the government providing it.
citation?
Here is a study showing 45,000 americans die per year from lack of coverage. Please note that this does not include people who are under covered (ie they have some coverage but still can't afford proper healthcare) as these numbers are much harder to determine. There are a great many people who die because they have insurance but can't afford the co-pay so they put off medical care and end up dying from complications. It also doesn't include people who die from trying to stretch out their medicine, ie taking less of it trying to make it last longer, which also kills lots of people. Unfortunately there is no 1 source which can show you the true level of death the American healthcare system causes.
citation for that one too
Here is a link showing that medical debt is tied to 66.5% of bankruptcies, approximately 530,000 families per year. With medicare for all this would be 0.
your assumptions are so far off the mark it makes you look kinda dumb to be honest, perhaps calm down, put your emotions in check, take the blinders off and read the words written in front of you without injecting your emotional knee jerk response to them.
What emotions are you referring to? You haven't given a single point disproving what I interpret your argument to be. Do you support a government plan to provide healthcare to every single american? Do you have some other plan that would accomplish this? If you don't, then you are supporting the continuation of the status quo, which as I have shown, kills a great many poor people. If you know that and still advocate for this position then you are advocating for their deaths. That is not an emotional argument, it is a factual one. If this is not your position then please tell me what your position is. It would be much easier to discuss this if you would clarify your position.
