-->
@Our_Boat_is_Right
You have thousands of blastocysts, or as you call them humans, being discarded every day. Why don't you take some of these blastocysts (humans) home with you and look after them?
Why?Unless a women's life is in danger, they should not have the right to kill another human being. Again, where do you draw the line?
Why?and has the right ti live
Um, because you are forcing your will against another human being
Why does human beings having intrinsic value necessarily mean that they have the right to live?Because human beings are intrinsically valuable. If you can't agree with that then I don't know what you are doing on this forum.
So human beings have a moral right to live, because they have a moral right to live? Are you familiar with circular reasoning?Human beings have a moral right to live.
Again, if you can't agree on this then why are you going through 19 pages of thread just for you to say humans can be murdered.
Blastocysts are a stage if human life. You keep using fancy words to distract from the scientific fact this is a human life. Like I said, there are many programs that are more than willing to look after babies if the mother can not do so herself.
Why don't any of these many programs take these discarded humans with them when they are discarded?
I'm open to suggestions on how we should combat terror.
Because they have already been murdered and are dead
I only believe human beings can be killed if it is a threat to another one's life.
When a blastocyst is removed what tests are performed to determine if is still alive or if it ever was alive?
Cite where I have called it a tumor?