One Of The Most Enigmatic Verse In All Christianity

Author: Stephen

Posts

Total: 100
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Athias
It continues to be an "enigma" because you have trouble understanding, even when replacing premises, the importance of context
I'll say. One would think if he was going to replace the context with a made up one, he would consider making sense.

Not to mention, John was the disciple whom Jesus loved and who was present at Jesus' crucifixion.

Yet our genius says it was Lazarus. Why? Because a verse elsewhere says Jesus loved Lazarus. What about other verses saying Jesus loved other people? Our genius "forgets" those.

What about the fact that John, whom Jesus loved, was present, and Lazarus, whom Jesus also loved, was not present but lived in another town? Our genius "forgets" those.

But this is a guy who thinks farm animals post to this forum. "Context" wouldn't hold much importance to such a person
Mopac
Mopac's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 8,050
3
4
7
Mopac's avatar
Mopac
3
4
7
Somewhat relevant Byzantine style chant in English.





Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,322
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@ethang5
Post 16 above ;

The new mod team is up to snuff. Give it time. As the dead-weights leave, higher quality posters will come in.

We just need to get past our bad reputation, and posters like you and PGA2.0 help greatly.

-> @EtrnlVw wrote ...thank God you're here to deal with the trolls.
 Just doing my job Sir.  ; )

I can  agree with you about the mods being well "up to snuff", Ethnag5, but not  much else.

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Stephen
You will disagree about that too shortly.

Do you really think farm animals can post to this forum?

Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,322
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@ethang5
You will disagree about that too shortly.

That is always a possibility. Now pick up the thread or simply leave it. I can do without your unnecessary harassment.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Stephen
How can a question about a comment you made be harassment?

Did you make the comment or not? If you didn't then we need to alert the mods that someone else has access to your account.

If you did make the comment, you need to explain it because barnyard animals cannot make posts to the internet. Why are you running away from a simple question about what you said?

...pick up the thread or simply leave it
You started with an off topic question to me about the mods. Hypocrite much?

Do you really think farm animals can post to this forum? You made the comment saheed. Can you explain it?
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,322
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@ethang5
How can a question about a comment you made be harassment?


Stop intentional cross threading to create an argument. it is totally against the rules.

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Stephen
How can a question about a comment you made be harassment?

Already answered on the correct and appropriate thread.
No sir. You contradicted yourself. You said MoPac was a sheep, but we know that barnyard animals cannot post here.

Then you agreed that barnyard animals cannot post here, but that leaves your comment calling MoPac a sheep a blatant contradiction. Address your contradiction.

Stop intentional cross threading to create an argument. it is totally against the rules.
There is no thread about your silly contradiction Pedro. It isn't a topic from any other thread.

It isn't so easy to address your own contradictions is it genius? You called a poster a sheep, and then said sheep could not post. Are you confused?
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,322
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@ethang5
How can a question about a comment you made be harassment?


Stop intentional cross threading to create an argument. it is totally against the rules.

ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,875
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
-->
@Stephen
Stop spamming your lame excuses and address your contradiction majoub.

You contradicted yourself. You said MoPac was a sheep, but we know that barnyard animals cannot post here.

Then you agreed that barnyard animals cannot post here, but that leaves your comment calling MoPac a sheep a blatant contradiction. Address your contradiction.

Are you ashamed?