In DP1, you suggested a mass claim. As soon as someone disagreed with your suggestion, you backed down and said it was to encourage activity. Why would mass claiming be worth activity?
Twice. I was mafia in the game you won as a monk.
Directly competing philosophies, each with trade-offs.I would hate for us to stay silent for days in fear of revealing anything. Even if it would technically be an optimal strategy, it sounds boring.On the other hand, mafia would gain more than town from knowing everyone's roles, so at least right now keeping our cards close to our chests seems best. ... I do not extend this to the inactives.
I'm LordLuke, vanilla
Clicked on that link you posted and was reading, and stumbled across this post from Ragnar. This is the manufactured thing I was talking aboutHalf of this thing is unnecessary and visibly looks like trying to hard to not make anyone mad
I wasn't on his team, I wouldn't knowI just now thought about this. How is LordLuke, the quintuple agent, a vanilla?
True, although I could make a fair argument that you could compare it with his debates/normal forum posts. He doesn't act like thatAgreed. However, we've never seen him as town, so there's nothing to contrast it with.
Who are your top two scum reads?
