-->
@TheRealNihilist
1. No
2. Willows is not currently banned.
My only interest is if they are the same users then one of the accounts needs to be disabled to comply with alternate account rules.
Is Spam Still Against the CoC Since Virt Took Over?
Posts
Total:
87
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Literally choosing what you want to speak about yet glance so much more important topics.
I ran this through a translator and got nothing. Not sure what to make of it.
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Did you not see Define spam?
I'll rephrase. You are choosing what to speak against. When you are doing that you don't realize you are not talking about the important questions like how do you define spam.
-->
@drafterman
Is that being looked into?1. No
2. Willows is not currently banned.
Have you asked ethang5 why Willows will make a second account when his original account is still active?
My only interest is if they are the same users then one of the accounts needs to be disabled to comply with alternate account rules.
Don't you already check people's IPs. What data could ethang5 give in order to convince you otherwise? If it is PM then wouldn't that mean ethang5 will be banned for sharing that information or maybe you will ban him for even accepting that before receiving that information. Don't know how you enforce that.
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Lol. A logical mod. I'm swooning with satisfaction.
Hey RealNihilist, if you know Sal to be other than Willows, say so. But of the two of us, its me who knows what he's talking about.
-->
@TheRealNihilist
1. NoIs that being looked into?
What? The fact that users are allowed to form and express their own opinions about other users? No, that is not being looked into.
2. Willows is not currently banned.Have you asked ethang5 why Willows will make a second account when his original account is still active?
No, why would I?
My only interest is if they are the same users then one of the accounts needs to be disabled to comply with alternate account rules.Don't you already check people's IPs.
When the need arises, the head moderators can check IPs, yet. It is not a routine thing, no.
What data could ethang5 give in order to convince you otherwise?
A public post where Salixes says they are Willow.
I don't know if it is in a PM, at the moment I haven't even asked for the info, I asked if it was public.If it is PM then wouldn't that mean ethang5 will be banned for sharing that information or maybe you will ban him for even accepting that before receiving that information. Don't know how you enforce that.
-->
@drafterman
Did they do this publicly or in PM?
In PM.
But I was not the first to out him.
But go over to DDO's religion page now and you will see his old threads he lifted unchanged and spammed here.
I don't know what's got realnihilist's panties in a bunch, except that maybe he feels a close affinity to another illogical atheist.
-->
@ethang5
Since the old account isn't in active use and they don't appear to have been perma banned, I don't see an issue. Thanks for the info
-->
@drafterman
What? The fact that users are allowed to form and express their own opinions about other users? No, that is not being looked into.
I guess it would be a CoC violation if he print screened his PM and posted it in the public?
No, why would I?
Okay.
When the need arises, the head moderators can check IPs, yet. It is not a routine thing, no.
How else do you check multi-accounts if not through IPs?
A public post where Salixes says they are Willow.
Guess PM's is not enough?
I don't know if it is in a PM, at the moment I haven't even asked for the info, I asked if it was public.
What is your next move since ethang5 said it was in PMs?
-->
@ethang5
? Do explain.Lol. A logical mod. I'm swooning with satisfaction.
-->
@TheRealNihilist
What? The fact that users are allowed to form and express their own opinions about other users? No, that is not being looked into.I guess it would be a CoC violation if he print screened his PM and posted it in the public?
Yes.
When the need arises, the head moderators can check IPs, yet. It is not a routine thing, no.How else do you check multi-accounts if not through IPs?
Multi accounts are checked through IPs, just not actively. It's ad hoc.
None.What is your next move since ethang5 said it was in PMs?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
what a lazy attempt to get ehtang banned by the nihilist
Hey buddy, still think my parents thinks that I am incompetent, really schooled me on a DEBATE WEBSITE, Mr. Alpha Male
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Not really lazy but I am talking to Dr.Franklin.what a lazy attempt to get ehtang banned by the nihilist
Hey buddy
That is so sweet.
still think my parents thinks that I am incompetent
You already know the answer why ask?
really schooled me on a DEBATE WEBSITE
Am I not supposed to be debating someone on a debating website?
Mr. Alpha Male
I guess your a beta since you called me an alpha? That's a yikes from me.
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Did you not see Define spam?
Any content which is nonsensical or excessively repetitive.
I'll rephrase. You are choosing what to speak against. When you are doing that you don't realize you are not talking about the important questions like how do you define spam.
Oh you mean that "let's have five different lines of conversation at once" thing that you keep trying to pull?
Yeah, frankly you aren't interesting enough for me to go for that.
So let's stick with one conversation at a time. You say mafia is being spammed. I asked why you think that. Your response _______?
<br>I guess your a beta since you called me an alpha? That's a yikes from me.
oh my god r/woooosh again
Salixes is pretty much Willows
-->
@Vader
True. And though he's mightily fighting his compulsion now, it is not controllable and he will lose. It's only a matter of time.
In the main time, lolz.
-->
@ethang5
Exactly lmao
all newest posts featured is salixes
My general advice would be to ignore him or challenge him to debates.
-->
@Barney
Ol' Sal is not interested in debate.
People are starting to ignore him. But let me warn you, for the last year Sal has been on the dead DDO, posting his lame spam to himself.
When the behavior is compulsive, ignoring them doesn't help. Sals emotional release is from posting his clunkers, no one answering makes no difference to him. He will accumulate hundreds of zero-reply turds here if he is allowed. His deep delusion all the while telling him he's "converting" Christians.
19 days later
-->
@drafterman
@Barney
@Vader
@Dr.Franklin
...though he's mightily fighting his compulsion now, it is not controllable and he will lose. It's only a matter of time.
I called it!
Is Spam Still Against the CoC Since Virt Took Over?
My only interest is if they are the same users then one of the accounts needs to be disabled to comply with alternate account rules. - Drafterman, Post # 61
But isn't having multiple accounts in itself a violation?
Since the old account isn't in active use and they don't appear to have been perma banned, I don't see an issue. - Drafterman, Post # 68
The old account is active. Can users have multiple accounts if only one is active at a time?
-->
@ethang5
Salixes and Willows are the same person. I can just tell without any info or context
-->
@Vader
Its easy. Several threads are literally the same, with the same title (ex. Are Theist Deluded?) And the same OP.
I was just under the apparently mistaken impression that no one could possess two accounts, even if one of the accounts was inactive.
Watching compulsion is like watching a train wreck in slow motion.
-->
@Vader
The main issue is that Salixes/Willows is so easy to mimic that it would be easy to confuse another for him who simply made threads fast as well.
On the other hand someone like me is nigh-impossible to imitate well. People didn't believe I was myself when I returned to DDO a couple of times. That's because I am a complex entity, with the only notable trait being my severe intellect and capacity to produce high quality drama.
Lol!...high quality drama.
-->
@ethang5
Yeah thats willows