-->
@3RU7AL
None of those definitions make a clear distinction between the CONCRETE NOUN and the ABSTRACT NOUN.And are therefore invalid.
Thats not fair as you do a similar thing at #339 as follows ergo not invalid for me any more than for you, then.
3ru #339..."Definition of exist, to have actual being; be real.Definition of real, being or occurring in fact or actuality; having verifiable existence; true and actual; not imaginary, alleged, or ideal.
3ru, you used "definitions" in your above comments, and I used dictionary definitions in my previous, yet you dont accept them. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Not only that, you even refer to that which "true" in your above comments #339.
By your definition, an idea can "exist" (lochnessbigfootunicornspacealiens) with the same validity as a planet.
False i.e. I no where suggested a concept was and occupied space as a planet or Universe is. Your playing mind games to avoid the truth{ concept of understanding that which is not false }.
Intellect exist ergo concecpts exist not as occupied space physical energy reality, rather as real concepts, of which some are more real { true } than others because they complement occupied space reality.
Concepts/ideas and intellect exist for and as, what they are. Meta{beyond}-space/Spirit-1 concepts ergo intellect/mind.
We can play conceptual mind games to allow our ego to avoid truth, we cannot change the truth of what exists as occupied space reality and Meta-space intellect/mind.
Now you may want to call my explanations mind games, as I do your approach, however, the differrence is truth of conceptual catagorizing our experiences.
So 3ru, do humans experience access to the catagory of intellectual mind/concepts, true or false? Were certainly seem to have the illusion of such.
All concepts are imaginary. Some imaginary concepts are true, i.e. the complement existence in reality. Others imaginaries are not true ex unicorns.