-->
@MisterChris
a lynch of Skittlez wouldn't be a big loss
bruh a mislynch is a big enough loss wym
Technology Mafia - DP1
Posts
Read-only
Total:
276
-->
@MisterChris
a rb if done correctly can literally prevent night kills
-->
@skittlez09
a rb if done correctly can literally prevent night kills
Sure, if done correctly. Truth is, there is a low probability of that.
Anyway, I'm not in favor of a lynch of you yet. Just speculating.
-->
@MisterChris
If properly used it is very effective in general. I don’t know where this theory. Town has the possibility to stop night kills because of this.
Also why so heavy on skittlez. 1/11th haven’t claim, and 1/2 haven’t done anything substantiative enough. If anything, skittlez understands the mistake and his blacklash is reasonable. If there’s an investigative role, simple investigate hin if you believe him as scum. There too many cards to vote someone just off a claim
-->
@MisterChris
Well unless the claim is CC’d, which it hasn’t been to my knowledge
-->
@oromagi
Lunatic and Danielle have not advised regarding wincon
No win con for me. Don't see why that would be different for scum though. You always press about win con statements has it ever resulted in you catching scum?
I am down with VTL'ing skittlez for false claim
Seems like an easy mislynch attempt lol.
-->
@skittlez09
a rb if done correctly can literally prevent night kills
You claiming your role un-provoked nullified most of its pro town utility.
-->
@Vader
Also why so heavy on skittlez. 1/11th haven’t claim, and 1/2 haven’t done anything substantiative enough. If anything, skittlez understands the mistake and his blacklash is reasonable. If there’s an investigative role, simple investigate hin if you believe him as scum. There too many cards to vote someone just off a claim
Fair enough. We need more info.
Official Vote Count
That1 (4/6) - oro, Chris, skittle, Intel,
Supa (1/6) - Danielle,
Intel (1/6) - Lunatic,
Speed (1/6) - pie,
Not voting: speed, Bear, That1, Supa,
Unvote
Just putting guns on someone probably busy enough to do something else other than playing games with a bunch of losers would probably be too much out of the whim. We are logic thinkers. I think we at least should wait for her to post something that is useful. If all day she just lurks and do nothing then it is probably a good idea, but not yet. We might just eliminate someone very useful to the town.
-->
@skittlez09
. Danielle just kinda voted out of no reasonpeople vote for no reason at the start of games as a joke
Him stating Donald Trump won the debate did solidify my decision to pressure him first, but that's not the only reason I did.
-->
@oromagi
Lunatic and Danielle have not advised regarding wincon
My PM doesn't state a win con. I replied to the mod "I assume I win with the town" and he confirmed.
If properly used it is very effective in general. I don’t know where this theory. Town has the possibility to stop night kills because of this.
@Bullish please confirm if a townie RB could block NKs in this game.
-->
@Danielle
Since RB is a generic role I can confirm in public, in my games a regular town RB blocks the NK.
Just a note, in Mharman's game the PM just said "town" and he said "I win with town" when he claimed
Skittlez did ^
-->
@Speedrace
Just a note, in Mharman's game the PM just said "town" and he said "I win with town" when he claimed
So? (I don't get it.) Who do you wanna pressure?
-->
@Danielle
So? (I don't get it.) Who do you wanna pressure?
This means that skittlez does add on to his PM sometimes, meaning that him saying he wins with town isn't significant.
I'd like to pressure That1 when she arrives
My policy lynches are That1 and Skitlez right now. The former for inactivity and the latter for negative town utility. No one has claimed Miller yet, so I’m assuming either That1 is Miller or a Miller doesn’t exist. If a cop exists then I’d advise them to be mindful of a a mafia affiliated affiliation manipulator.
-->
@Speedrace
This means that skittlez does add on to his PM sometimes, meaning that him saying he wins with town isn't significant.
Gotcha.
-->
@ILikePie5
Why do you think that there's a miller?
-->
@Speedrace
Why do you think that there's a miller?
Where did I say a Miller exists? I’m making assumptions that a Miller doesn’t exist cause no one has confessed - unless it’s That1.
-->
@ILikePie5
My policy lynches are That1 and Skitlez right now. The former for inactivity and the latter for negative town utility. No one has claimed Miller yet, so I’m assuming either That1 is Miller or a Miller doesn’t exist. If a cop exists then I’d advise them to be mindful of a a mafia affiliated affiliation manipulator.
This whole post is useless lol. There is no negative town utility to a townie RB if the RB simply doesn't use their role (or uses it effectively). They can waive it so I don't think that role is inherently anti-town. I also happen to believe the role claim for now.
Stating there is either a miller or no miller is... obvious.
And I don't see why you would advise a cop that there may be an affiliation manipulator. Duh? Is this a way of saying if you are investigated scum, you want to blame a framer? I just don't see the point of this post. If nobody wants to pressure Supa I'm wondering if anyone would be interested in pressuring you until That1 comes on.
-->
@Danielle
This whole post is useless lol. There is no negative town utility to a townie RB if the RB simply doesn't use their role (or uses it effectively). They can waive it so I don't think that role is inherently anti-town. I also happen to believe the role claim for now.
His role is more often than not used for scum. In a role madness game there’s more likely than not a Roleblocker. Connect those two and voila. You also have to consider if there’s both a town and a scum roleblocker than he’s an easy mislynch opportunity.
Stating there is either a miller or no miller is... obvious.And I don't see why you would advise a cop that there may be an affiliation manipulator. Duh? Is this a way of saying if you are investigated scum, you want to blame a framer? I just don't see the point of this post. If nobody wants to pressure Supa I'm wondering if anyone would be interested in pressuring you until That1 comes on.
Just something to be mindful of for a possible cop. I don’t see harm in reinforcing it cause we have people who make questionable decisions sometimes.
-->
@Lunatic
Holy sh you're good at BeatSaber
-->
@Danielle
Why are you admit on pressuring me now
adment*
-->
@BearMan
Holy sh you're good at BeatSaber
Thanks man lol. You should watch airmax, he is another member here I used to compete with. He's a bit better than me and can do expert plus
Also I agree with danielle about policy lynching millers and roleblockers is kind of dumb. But it is consistent with what pie has always said so it's a null read.