Saying that someone is racist because they believe that whites are smarter than blacks is like saying someone is sexist because they believe men are physically stronger than women. If it’s true, then it’s not racist or sexist to say either claim. It would be a fact at that point.
saying that one race is superior to another is the textbook example of racism. It is not possible to be more racist than that. He believed that black people were genetically inferior to white people. There is no constructive conversation possible with someone like that.
You may not threaten or promote violence against any person or persons, barring hyperbole against public figures (e.g., “all politicians should be shot”). Advocacy in favor of terrorism and/or violent extremism, especially as related to hate groups as generally defined by the SPLC, is likewise prohibited.
I'm not finding any specific reference to "racism" in the CoC. [LINK]
Saying that someone is racist because they believe that whites are smarter than blacks is like saying someone is sexist because they believe men are physically stronger than women. If it’s true, then it’s not racist or sexist to say either claim. It would be a fact at that point.If someone said that gays and bisexuals are more likely to get HIV, provided the source they put is reliable, this isn’t homophobic to say. It is a fact.
Saying that someone is racist because they believe that whites are smarter than blacks is like saying someone is sexist because they believe men are physically stronger than women. If it’s true, then it’s not racist or sexist to say either claim. It would be a fact at that point.
If someone said that gays and bisexuals are more likely to get HIV
In reality, chances of contracting HIV are directly related to choosing risky behavior.
but he was a racist asshole spreading bullshit white supremacism nonsense.
In reality, chances of contracting HIV are directly related to choosing risky behavior.Which gays and bi males are more likely to do. It’s not homophobic to say this. It’s just fact.
Statistically speaking, those populations would have higher averages. In reality, this sort of decision is entirely up to the individual.
You seem to forget all the free land that was given away to "lighter-skin-toned-people" (in the U.S.A).
You seem to forget all the home loans that were systematically denied to "darker-skin-toned-people" (REDLINE).
You seem to forget about the disproportionate conviction rates between "lighter-skin-toned-people" and "darker-skin-toned-people".
If gay and bi males want to be less likely to get HIV, as well as if anyone wants to avoid an STI, they should wait until marriage to have sex.
He is entitled to free speech.
I think what is holding black people back isn’t genetics or systemic racism, but instead it is the single motherhood epidemic that is infecting ALL racial groups, but especially the black ethnic group. If single motherhood didn’t exist, then racial equality in America would exist more in statistics.
This was almost 200 years ago.
When these factors are brought into the statistics and taken into account, black children raised in rural areas with 2 parents are as likely to end up in jail as whites in the same conditions.
You seem to forget all the home loans that were systematically denied to "darker-skin-toned-people" (REDLINE).I have no idea what you are referring to as black people can get loans just as whites can.
if he were standing on a street corner, then you would be absolutely right. he has the right to do shit like that. A website is not a street corner. It is owned and managed by the site's owner. That owner can put limits on what you can say on their website. So no, he is not entitled to free speech.
If you have a name that doesn't sound like it is a a white person's name you are much less likely to get a job interview, for example. And that has absolutely nothing to do with single mothers. It has to do with racism.
If gay and bi males want to be less likely to get HIV, as well as if anyone wants to avoid an STI, they should wait until marriage to have sex.
Not all of them do, but enough gay and bi males have promiscuous sex and as a result, get STDs. People shouldn’t have sex until marriage to prevent STI spreading.
if that were true, then black children from homes with two parents would succeed at the same rate as any other group. But that isn't what happens.
If you have a name that doesn't sound like it is a a white person's name you are much less likely to get a job interview,
...something must be done to prevent it.
If it is true, then people with those names should change their name to something western.
The solution, if this problem exists, is certainly not racial reparations...
If you say racist stuff on a street corner, people can walk away. If you say racist stuff online, people can walk away ie go somewhere else.
If it is true, then people with those names should change their name to something western.
Besides the fact that most minorities have at least 1 European name(out of first name, last name), anyone who feels victimized because of their name is free to legally change their name to something that they think will give them a better job.
The solution, if this problem exists, is certainly not racial reparations as this costs an insane amount of money, it keeps minorities dependent on government handouts, which keeps them poor, and it worsens race relations.
