a day in the life of sue, a republican

and one party has large support for hate speech, that would be the much bigger issue. 

I think most people support common sense gun control. There is a difference of opinion of where that line should be, but i think most people can agree that having to pass a training course and a background check is reasonable. But the republican party tries to obstruct any kind of reform at all.

yeah, the republicans. They love those gun toting "proud boys" who try to attack and kill protesters

The fact that republicans hate a word they don't even understand is the much bigger issue.

none of these things are differences in basic values. Xenophobia isn't a value. both sides are against (or at least claim to be against, the republicans seem to cheer it on) violence in the streets.

They differ in certain policy goals. How much gun control is the right amount? No one thinks they should be handed out on the street to every person that comes along, virtually no one thinks all guns should be banned. So everyone agrees some amount of gun control is needed, it is just how much that is at question.

the issue is not that there are fundamental differences in basic values, it is that polarizing language is being used by both sides to try to play up this divide. The leadership of both parties want you think that the other side is the "other". They are unreasonable and want to destroy your way of life, etc. That way you have no choice but to support them, even though you likely don't agree with alot of the things that leader wants to do. It is a political tactic, and it is causing huge damage.

They blame every bad thing currently in black peoples’ lives on white people. White people are evil oppressors and we are somehow uniquely bad because of slavery, even though the North African slave trade enslaved more white people. Just check out all of the white people who have raised black power fists, kiss/washed boots of black people, and groveled at them since the beginning of the year. It goes much deeper than that, but those are the most visible signs.

Biden said there will be at least a 100 day moratorium on deportations, no matter what they have done.

California refuses to work with ICE to help deport illegal aliens.

How are gun manufacturers negligent that they should be sued for?

But, I’d say the people who want to pervert what America has always been and was meant to be should leave first.

I’m familiar with it being associated with dilapidated housing and housing shortages. I could be wrong. I’ll look into it.

Because of their crap, I will soon not be proud to be an American. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to become an anti-white version of Brazil.

No teacher in the history of college has ever said that

Liberals are not wrong about everything.

That's a pretty nonsensical position considering the U.S. is a nation built by immigrants. 

Can you show me where he said that?

No, that is a blatant misrepresentation (paraphrase) that you completely made up. Literally. No teacher in the history of college has ever said that, you have no proof that anyone has ever said that, yet you will stand by that indefensible and unsubstantiated falsehood just because it suits your narrative of wanting to hate liberals for whatever reason. What does get taught in college are the ways slavery, Jim Crow, and subsequent racism have had an undeniable impact on black people's lives. Obviously that should be taught because it is relevant to our history, culture and society. Perhaps the (somewhat obvious) reason American slavery gets prioritized in our education is because we live in the U.S.

I don't know what you're referring to about "white people raising black power fists" since the beginning of the year. I know that after a police officer murdered George Floyd in the middle of the year, a lot of white people showed support and advocated change to the criminal justice system. I'm not sure what you think that proves.

They are a Sanctuary State meaning they don't go out of their way to find illegal immigrants, but that doesn't mean they welcome or want to keep violent criminals so that doesn't really prove anything. Besides, you don't believe the citizens of California should get to vote on the laws that govern California? Interesting.

Big Pharma has settled billions of dollars worth of lawsuits regarding the careless distribution of drugs they manufacture. Gun manufacturers can be held liable in a similar way if their products get into the wrong hands. We have a constitutional right to bear arms, but we don't have a constitutional right to buy a gun. The court could easily say manufacturers of dangerous products (like guns) have a responsibility to ensure those products are not abused by requiring stringent background checks and other barriers of purchase, again like opioids and other prescriptions.

That's a pretty nonsensical position considering the U.S. is a nation built by immigrants. After slave labor helped make the country rich, immigrants made it thrive throughout the Industrial Revolution. The country has always been a melting pot with more immigration than anywhere else in the world since this country's inception. Do you not believe the U.S. is great and hasn't been great this whole time? Which country is better?

Even if you wanted to delude yourself into believing harmony could be achieved with one homogenous race and religion (despite how many times that's been disproven throughout history) we know white Christians in Vermont are much different than white Christians in Mississippi. There is absolutely, positively no one or right way to be American or define what America has "always been." So that's really just hyperbolic 'love it or leave it' nonsense.

Which crap is that? I think it's stupid to be hyper-partisan and cheer against a political party like it's a sports team. Liberals are not wrong about everything. An example of how stupid it is to devote yourself for/against one political party is to look at how much the GOP has changed just in the last 4 years alone. They've done a complete 180 where they used to be for free trade; now they're pro regulation and tariffs. All of their pro capitalism rhetoric went right out the window and most Republicans are too ignorant to have any clue what they're even cheering for.

Another example is how Republicans were firmly against increasing the deficit and would not increase spending at ALL when Obama was in office. When Trump was in office, they did another 180 and voted for the exact same things they voted against when Obama's administration proposed them. So really people just like hating shit for the sake of hating it and start yelling like monkeys. They don't even know what they're talking about half the time. I think it's pathetic to take sides like that as both parties tend to be right/wrong on various things.

It's interesting that Bernie and AOC have somehow come to define the Democrat party even though most Dems are more moderate. That's how Republicans aimed to win their political races in 2020: scaring people into thinking the Democrats are now bonafide socialists. It's not true but it worked like a charm so it was a good strategy. I'm personally not a fan of socialist politics myself. I am a fan of inclusion and non discrimination. Obviously it doesn't matter to any sane or decent human being which bathroom someone chooses to pee in, so I don't hate on Democrats for stuff like that.

If the legal status of immigrants is what determines their utility to America,  just make them all legal :) 

If the legal status of immigrants is what determines their utility to America,  just make them all legal :) 

Wapo asked every candidate if they supported a 100 day moratorium on all deportations. Biden is under the “yes” column not the “yes with exceptions” column.

Ask literally any college professor what the cause of any racial disparity in achievement is. I guarantee you that over 80% will blame some buzzword like “systemic racism” or “redlining” or “colonialism”. It would be incredibly rare to find ANY that put even an ounce of blame on any underachieving minority group.

No, immigration law is federal in nature. I see you try to play the federalism card when convenient, even though it doesn’t apply.

But whether or not people are going through background checks is a role of the government to determine.

If you stab people with a filet knife, should we sue knife manufacturers?

And whether or not manufacturers can distribute their guns to certain areas.... guess what? That is also for the government to determine. They put magazine limits and other laws if they want to restrict sales. It isn’t up to the gun maker to do the government’s job.

That is just a shameless attempt at restricting gun rights by threatening manufacturers. (Meanwhile as you allude to, there is no right to drugs in the Constitution)

And prior to the 1960s, we had an immigration system designed to acquire European immigrants, who were much more likely to assimilate into American culture.

 I remember not 40 years ago, when the country was not like it was now, that we had 49 state landslide victories.

However, the Dems and I’d wager to say the vast majority of their voters select candidates that are too far gone socially to ever get my vote in the next few decades.

Also guess I’m indecent and insane because I don’t think grown men who think they are women should be in the same bathroom as little girls.

Worked for Rome! hurrdurr.

Not at all!

I see. Why did you bother pointing out that the immigrants who built America were legal immigrants? 

 Xenophobia is not new. 

The acceptance of mass migration by a nation's leaders is a symptom of deep corruption and a complete inability to sustain the welfare of the citizens they are tasked to provide for.

The country was founded by migrants and government isn't supposed to provide.

Okay, you go girl with your bad self with the "all cultures are equal" bullshit.

This is just your opinion and has no factual basis.  The country was founded by migrants

This country was founded by conquerors, pioneers, and explorers 💪

They literally just stamped your shit at Ellis Island and didn't even spell people's name right let alone verify they've "assimilated." The people coming didn't have jobs, houses or established communities.  You're lucky if their infectious diseases were caught and stopped from coming in.

It's convenient that you linked to a graphic behind a firewall, but beyond a cute cartoon photo we can defer to what the Biden campaign has actually said about what he wants to do in his first 100 days.  They released a joint statement with Latino Victory Fund committing to a total moratorium on deportations during his first 100 days as president, and said efforts will be narrowly targeted to those who commit a felony offense in the United States or who present a national security threat. In fact there was a famous clip of some immigrant confronting Biden asking him if he would stop all removals, but Biden refused, saying he’d prioritize deporting people who committed felonies or “serious crimes” instead. The guy objected, and Biden flippantly responded “You should vote for Trump" which became a viral clip. 

But yeah, no, there's no evidence Biden or Democrats have any interest or desire to keep felonious or violent criminals in the U.S.

As I said: you have absolutely, positively, undoubtedly, not one iota or even scintilla of any kind of verifiable proof or justifiable evidence at all whatsoever that liberals or college professors "blame white people for all their problems." You want to talk about BUZZWORDS? Lol you literally just repeated the nonsense you said before. You predictably responded with nothing but more of that paraphrased rhetoric that I said you couldn't substantiate. And you didn't. And you can't.

That's because nobody "blames white people for all their problems." They just explain why the effects of slavery, Jim Crow and racism have a ripple effect that permeate in different ways (albeit watered down over the years) throughout society. People's complete and utter failure or refusal to recognize that and accept the facts, research and anecdotal experiences that are presented doesn't make racism an imaginary boogeyman, just FYI.

I'm pretty sure you don't know anything about me or what "cards" I play and when. Another thing you don't know is the law lol. The 10th amendment of the Constitution says that states do not have to enforce federal laws, which is why some states legalized pot even though it is federally criminalized (the feds can still enforce federal laws within those states). In fact, this past June the Supreme Court refused to hear Trump's challenge to the state of California’s sanctuary law. You must have completely missed that, but it was a great win for state's rights.

No, although depending on how litigious one is they can try. Knives are not as dangerous as guns though. Guns are designed specifically to kill. That's their purpose.

So yes, in short there is absolutely a legal basis for what I'm suggesting. You can disagree but you'd need to understand tort law first.

You have no reason to believe that Hispanic immigrants won't assimilate. None. All evidence points to the contrary.

A landslide victory is not indicative of righteousness. It's also pretty amusing to see you lament partisanship while you have taken such a hardline stance against the left lol.

Probably not. The majority of the party is pretty moderate, so much so in fact that Bernie Sanders lost in a landslide to a dinosaur like Joe Biden. He is considered a moderate with a history of bipartisan sponsorship. AOC and "the squad" are in the minority. They are considered political outsiders and hate the likes of Nancy Pelosi whom they see as an establishment hack. Most Dems are corporatist and economically moderate, though they do want government healthcare. So do Republicans according to polling. It's true the Dems might move the country left on some things but I don't see the Green New Deal or anything like that happening.

Yeah, you're probably just bigoted and don't realize it or want to admit it. The fact is there is absolutely nothing stopping grown men from going into the bathroom with little girls now. If anyone has an intent on raping or harming a little girl they can and will, and no bathroom policy will stop that. Period. Thinking some little sign on the door will stop them is as insanely stupid and naïve as thinking a "no guns" sign will stop criminals from carrying guns. 

In reality the "men" who use women's bathrooms often look and dress like women. They go in a private stall (unlike men's bathrooms, you don't watch anyone piss). This is safer for them than being in the men's bathroom considering there is a history of trans people being assaulted and harassed by grown men. There is no history of little girls being harassed and assaulted in the women's bathroom. There's a history of them being assaulted and raped in general, but when people tried to talk about that it got ridiculed as a liberal crybaby movement (#MeToo) cuz rape only matters if it happens in a bathroom apparently. 

Yeah, they migrated here.

You can cut the bullshit with the false equivalency between immigrants pre-FDR and immigrants post FDR as if there is no difference. 

If only Roman history was required reading instead of some fucked-up dated poem on a piece of French metal.