AMA About...

Author: EtrnlVw

Posts

Total: 80
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
As long as you assume facts can't be obtained within the spiritual arena I guess you'll never know. Let me know if you come up with anymore questions. 
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@ludofl3x
And let me know if you have anymore questions about anything mentioned in the OP!
Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,343
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@EtrnlVw
Utilitarianism
"the doctrine that actions are right if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority."
"the doctrine that an action is right insofar as it promotes happiness, and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct."
 "a doctrine that the useful is the good and that the determining consideration of right conduct should be the usefulness of its consequences"

Nothing wrong about this concept! this is a universally acceptable principle...
Hi - EtrnVw,

I would disagree with you on this one.  Utilitarianism is also captured by the sentence "the ends justifies the means".  This means that so far as the end is desired - however we get to that end is justified.   An example might be - we need to get Trump out of the white house - so committing mass fraud is justified.  Furthermore lying about it is justified. and destroying people and their reputations is justified. 

If Getting Trump out of the White House is seen by some as the greater good - then how it gets done becomes irrelevant.  The ends - justifies the means.  

For me - the journey and the destination are both equally important. And I would submit that the God of the Bible - would also hold to that view.  An example from Jesus life will suffice. In his temptation by Satan, Satan offered Jesus - the whole world if Jesus would bow down to him.  Jesus came to save the world - if that end was the most important thing - then how he got there would make no difference.  After all, how many times have we heard people say "why would God send Jesus to die on a cross" - if he is God surely he could have found a better way?  

Yet - the journey and the destination mattered to Jesus.  If it only takes a moment to bow to Satan, rather than endure the cross and the suffering - why would he choose the more difficult way unless the journey was as least as important as the end? 

In any event, I  reject that the the God of the Bible would find nothing wrong with that principle - And furthermore I would reject it is a universally accepted principle. It is a principle - coined by Jeremy Benthem - and is at the heart of socialism, communism, and modern day capitalist economics.  

Yet, it is opposed by many people and many religions and many ways of life - that believe that process is as important as outcome. That how we journey  to a destination is important. That the ENDS do not justify the means. 
EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@Tradesecret
I would disagree with you on this one.

I'm more or less looking at the overarching principle involved and it sounds reasonable at face value if we're considering it in relation to the whole of a people, group or society. But I'm sure anything can be twisted to be used as something negative or perceived as negative depending on who we are asking.

The overarching principle is basically:
"Utilitarianism is a theory of morality, which advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and opposes actions that cause unhappiness or harm. When directed toward making social, economic, or political decisions, a utilitarian philosophy would aim for the betterment of society as a whole."

So obviously, if we're going to consider this ideal as something useful or to be applied all the specifics/angles should be considered but to prevent discrimination and condemnation towards people because of a tribe mentality for example, perhaps factions of religions or special groups that wish to impose their discriminations and rules on "outsiders" I think it's useful in protecting the whole of a society.

This means that so far as the end is desired - however we get to that end is justified.   An example might be - we need to get Trump out of the white house - so committing mass fraud is justified.  Furthermore lying about it is justified. and destroying people and their reputations is justified.

Well this doesn't come across to me as ethical, and serves to undermine the overarching principle of valuing happiness, or preventing harm. Destroying someone's reputation through lies should be prevented by other more specific laws put in place, so this model should be supported by a surrounding body of other governing laws upheld by the justice system. I'll consider what you are saying though, but I'm not saying this model of morality should exist alone without other means of justice.

In any event, I  reject that the the God of the Bible would find nothing wrong with that principle

I'm sure, but that wasn't really the objective in this discussion. There's many things people complain/argue about in the Bible that might not support "Utilitarianism holds that an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce sadness, or the reverse of happiness" such as the persecution of certain people due to religious ideas....this obviously should be prevented because you might not want Islam for example, using there Holy Book as a means of reaching their agenda or imposing it upon your life and your choices.
So for this discussion I'm not using the Bible as basis for morality, otherwise we would have to allow other religious authority as well. However you brought up some good concerns thank you. 

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,278
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@EtrnlVw
Where is the Spiritual Arena?

Is that near the Mystical Stadium?

Just down the road from the Metaphysical Circus?


It's actually very easy to create spirituality....All that you need is an old building, a tall tale and a gullible recipient.

EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Well if you have anything besides sarcasm maybe you could get back in the discussion. Are you on meds Zed? sometimes you're a great guy and the very next moment you're a shyt head, you should get that worked out. The guy in the other topic about your attitudes seems to think it's our fault you guys are pricks, but I don't think so, you seem to just like being one. Let me know when you grow up. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,278
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@EtrnlVw
Well.....That was the pot calling the kettle black....Do you known that saying?

You should have taken the moral high ground and just ignored me.


Nonetheless, I don't do offended.


And It is actually very easy to create spirituality.....Provide a stimulus and the brain will respond.


And if you occasionally say silly things....Then occasionally you can expect sarcasm.

74 days later

EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Well this part of the forum is getting more monotonous by the day, however I'm still here if there are any unique and sincere questions to spice things up a bit. FLWR, Brother D, Stephen and Victor need not apply. I'll be searching for intelligent inquiries. BTW, these questions or inquiries are not limited to the Bible or any religious source! if you wish for a change in scenery from the day to day check in here thanks. 
secularmerlin
secularmerlin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,093
3
3
3
secularmerlin's avatar
secularmerlin
3
3
3
-->
@EtrnlVw
I've never witnessed a spirit or a ghost or a god or any supernatural force screw in a lightbulb. Can any supernatural force effect reality visibly and directly like that and if so how many god(s) does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,322
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
FLWR, Brother D, Stephen and Victor need not apply

That just about makes up the total of the religion sub forum.  I thought you said no bias?  #1  EtrnlVw

Anyway, while I am here:

When will Jesus return as promised? Millions of Christians believe his return is " imminent".  A simple  - I don't know - will do, unless of course you do know?


EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Oh well, forced into dialogue with myself I guess. In that case at least there will be intelligent discourse lol. 

Dear Eternal I would like to start this discussion if you don't mind, does the Creator have an infinite eternal past? if so, what does an infinite past, no beginning really mean? or how can a thing have no beginning?

Great starting point my friend!

The Creator is both infinite and eternal, however both infinity and eternity are misunderstood. Those terms are not relevant to time at all actually, believe it or not! (so there is no actual infinite regression paradox!). Infinity and eternity exist as a state of equilibrium or a state in which no change occurs. I'll explain below.

Time does not exist eternally as a constant, rather only appears as a measurement alongside the movement of matter and the appearance of form. Where something begins and where something ends is where a linear frame of procession (time frame) occurs. Outside of that is a fixed constant reality where there is no longer a beginning and ending and so no linear progression. It is simply existence as it is where nothing appears and nothing decays and so it is void of what we perceive as a measurement of movement or the passing of events. There is an order of operation in existence as it applies to God's existence as the first cause. Here below is such an order beginning with the very first reality....

- God = awareness (consciousness)
- Conscious activity (awareness/intelligence) = energy (consciousness then energy co-exist)
- Manipulation of energy (where process begins)
- Appearance of form (where a linear time frame begins)
- Time = measurement = now relevant
- Death = no measurement
- No measurement = no time

So basically we have.....God = energy/ energy = creation/ creation = time/ time = measurement/ measurement = linear frame of reference/ linear time frame = a beginning and ending.

Now notice that time is only relevant to the appearance of an event as it appears in order, it has no association to God (or eternity) and so God does not have a beginning point or an ending point. So the Creator exists as a constant not as a linear progression. Imagine a static or fixed Reality where you have the appearance of events, processes, form and time is simply the observation of those appearances and that observation is what we label "time".

Time exists as a measurement of events unfolding but time is an illusion to the backdrop of reality (which is unchanging, static or fixed). The universe, or that which exists within the universe is nothing more than a moving picture play of energy with the birth and death of matter through form on top of a timeless fabric as we observe it as a measurement of "time" (passing).
Preceding the appearance of energy as kinetic energy is the static eternal presence of consciousness, what we call God (without beginning or ending)....the conscious awareness of God out of which all things originate. In this preceding state of existence there is no infinite past or future in terms of how we measure time, because it is independent of the movement of events within the universe. It is indeed the backdrop behind the birth and death scale of material existence. This of course deals with the infinite regression paradox because there is no infinite past in terms of the measurement of time, God does not exist on a linear scale of time. God exists as an eternal fixed state of awareness.

EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Great starting point my friend!

Thanks bro, we can have a good dialogue as there are so many questions and factors to determine regarding these types of topics! I'll try and stay on course here. 

The Creator is both infinite and eternal, however both infinity and eternity are misunderstood. Those terms are not relevant to time at all actually, believe it or not! (so there is no actual infinite regression paradox!). Infinity and eternity exist as a state of equilibrium or a state in which no change occurs. I'll explain below.

Time does not exist eternally as a constant, rather only appears as a measurement alongside the movement of matter and the appearance of form. Where something begins and where something ends is where a linear frame of procession (time frame) occurs. Outside of that is a fixed constant reality where there is no longer a beginning and ending and so no linear progression. It is simply existence as it is where nothing appears and nothing decays and so it is void of what we perceive as a measurement of movement or the passing of events. There is an order of operation in existence as it applies to God's existence as the first cause. Here below is such an order beginning with the very first reality....

- God = awareness (consciousness)
- Conscious activity (awareness/intelligence) = energy (consciousness then energy co-exist)
- Manipulation of energy (where process begins)
- Appearance of form (where a linear time frame begins)
- Time = measurement = now relevant
- Death = no measurement
- No measurement = no time

So basically we have.....God = energy/ energy = creation/ creation = time/ time = measurement/ measurement = linear frame of reference/ linear time frame = a beginning and ending.

Now notice that time is only relevant to the appearance of an event as it appears in order, it has no association to God (or eternity) and so God does not have a beginning point or an ending point. So the Creator exists as a constant not as a linear progression. Imagine a static or fixed Reality where you have the appearance of events, processes, form and time is simply the observation of those appearances and that observation is what we label "time".

Time exists as a measurement of events unfolding but time is an illusion to the backdrop of reality (which is unchanging, static or fixed). The universe, or that which exists within the universe is nothing more than a moving picture play of energy with the birth and death of matter through form on top of a timeless fabric as we observe it as a measurement of "time" (passing).
Preceding the appearance of energy as kinetic energy is the static eternal presence of consciousness, what we call God (without beginning or ending)....the conscious awareness of God out of which all things originate. In this preceding state of existence there is no infinite past or future in terms of how we measure time, because it is independent of the movement of events within the universe. It is indeed the backdrop behind the birth and death scale of material existence. This of course deals with the infinite regression paradox because there is no infinite past in terms of the measurement of time, God does not exist on a linear scale of time. God exists as an eternal fixed state of awareness.

Okay first of all holy crap, I never considered eternity as a state of existence independent of time as you put it so simply. It seems to me that basically you're saying there is an unchanging Reality (fixed state of existence), which invokes changes within that Reality (processes occurring). And then those changes that occur are what dictate time? and the processes that occur are the results of energy which are the results of awareness AKA God/intelligence?

If there is no beginning or ending because there is no infinite past or infinite amount time passing wow, if that is true it answers a lot, and it deals with the confusion and paradox of an infinite past, or an infinite regression. I've never been able to get my head around something existing forever with no beginning but you gave me a solid answer to consider I'll give you props on that, but could you expand on this before I get back to eternity, we know energy as the only constant in the universe. Are you saying then that energy is created?


EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Okay first of all holy crap, I never considered eternity as a state of existence independent of time as you put it so simply. It seems to me that basically you're saying there is an unchanging Reality (fixed state of existence), which invokes changes within that Reality (processes occurring). And then those changes that occur are what dictate time? and the processes that occur are the results of energy which are the results of awareness AKA God/intelligence?

Well at least we're not going to have any reading comprehension issues here lol. That is what I'm saying, how do you feel about that? does it satisfy the intellect fully?

If there is no beginning or ending because there is no infinite past or infinite amount time passing wow, if that is true it answers a lot, and it deals with the confusion and paradox of an infinite past, or an infinite regression. I've never been able to get my head around something existing forever with no beginning but you gave me a solid answer to consider I'll give you props on that,

Excellent! let me know if you need me to elaborate.

but could you expand on this before I get back to eternity, we know energy as the only constant in the universe.
We know energy as the only constant that can be measured, but it's not the only constant. Awareness cannot be measured because it has no association with any other thing, it has no property that can be "detected" or measured and so it is assumed or speculated that energy exists alone. Awareness is existence, without existence there is no awareness and without awareness there is no existence. The two are inseparable, there cannot be one without the other. For something to exist, there must first be something that which makes it relevant

Are you saying then that energy is created?

Nope not at all, energy is not created rather it is generated. What's the difference? well the terms created and generated are two separate things for starters. Creation is the beginning of something so if energy were created that would render energy as something that exists on a linear time scale like form, but energy creates form through processes and so energy precedes processes, in other words it is not a created thing. However there is only one other factor that precedes energy and that is consciousness, what we call God. Energy is generated by conscious activity so both energy and awareness (God) co-exist. And if energy co-exists with God then both energy and God are eternal. And if energy and God are eternal then they exist independent of time.
Energy appears to us as the first cause because we cannot measure what precedes energy, or what co-exists with energy. All we can detect is the movement of energy, that is the vibrational quality of conscious activity what we call kinetic energy.





EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
 Awareness is existence, without existence there is no awareness and without awareness there is no existence. The two are inseparable, there cannot be one without the other. For something to exist, there must first be something that which makes it relevant

This seems to be structurally sound, I think I get it in terms of logic and common sense but I'm not sure I fully believe it. Why? I don't know why, maybe it's because it's something I cannot personally observe. On the other hand because it makes sense am I forced to accept it? you left me perplexed here, I guess I'll have to think about it. 

Nope not at all, energy is not created rather it is generated. What's the difference? well the terms created and generated are two separate things for starters. Creation is the beginning of something so if energy were created that would render energy as something that exists on a linear time scale like form, but energy creates form through processes and so energy precedes processes, in other words it is not a created thing. However there is only one other factor that precedes energy and that is consciousness, what we call God. Energy is generated by conscious activity so both energy and awareness (God) co-exist. And if energy co-exists with God then both energy and God are eternal. And if energy and God are eternal then they exist independent of time.
Energy appears to us as the first cause because we cannot measure what precedes energy, or what co-exists with energy. All we can detect is the movement of energy, that is the vibrational quality of conscious activity what we call kinetic energy.

I want to get back to some of this but wait a minute, it just occurred to me that you're saying that God has no location or point of reference in time or space? so then consciousness exists independent of form?


EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
This seems to be structurally sound, I think I get it in terms of logic and common sense but I'm not sure I fully believe it. Why? I don't know why, maybe it's because it's something I cannot personally observe. 

Hold on now, it is the very fact that you CAN observe it, is what makes it relevant to you. You are observing it! we're just moving away from your personal observation point to a universal omnipresent scale of Reality. 

On the other hand because it makes sense am I forced to accept it? you left me perplexed here, I guess I'll have to think about it. 

Lol. 

I want to get back to some of this but wait a minute, it just occurred to me that you're saying that God has no location or point of reference in time or space? so then consciousness exists independent of form?

Very good catch! finally a member who understands implications and can follow logic....this brings me to a whole other discussion all together. That's right though, if energy and consciousness co-exist then they also must have the same attributes! if energy exists everywhere so does God, and if energy exists within form and independent of form then so does God (consciousness). If God is eternal then so is energy, and if God is omnipresent then so is energy. Everywhere energy exists awareness exists and everywhere there is awareness there is energy.
So guess what!? that means we can account for why energy does what it does in creation! because energy is the force of intelligent operations, which is why it generates intelligent processes/productions.
Awareness does not need form to exist but form certainly needs both energy and intelligence to exist as they appear as processes. Form is only relevant to creation, and so consciousness must precede any created event or created forms. Well then obviously God exists independent of any created thing which also includes forms within creation. God cannot be subject to creation obviously, as that would mean that creation precedes the Creator. Not so, God can exist within form but is not subject to any form. In other words God can create form or embodiments to exist within but God will always exist independent of anything created.

Now this is where it gets interesting, to isolate consciousness there must be form! if conscious awareness is to have any point of reference to a specific location it must be confined to a form within creation. Consciousness then must be isolated to have an individual experience as one perceiving time and space within that simulation through a body. This creates individual perception obviously. If God wants a soul for example, to experience Its creation God would have to confine that conscious soul to a body within a created world. This is where we see consciousness existing within bodies within our universe, which of course creates the illusion that consciousness is dependent upon form, or created by a brain. But actuality it is the opposite, the body and brain simply confine conscious experience to a located point of reference they do not create consciousness they simply conduct it as components, but consciousness precedes any bodies within creation. This means that the soul first originates with God not any embodiment.

EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Hold on now, it is the very fact that you CAN observe it, is what makes it relevant to you. You are observing it! we're just moving away from your personal observation point to a universal omnipresent scale of Reality. 

Haha, I have to admit it is a very intriguing proposition. One that I must accept? I don't know I'm not sure about that, on the other hand I have no objection to it for any real reason. In order for something to exist, there must be something that is aware of that existence for it to exist? wow, that is something I'll think about. It does seem to account for a Creator and what omnipresence means, because really I never was totally sure about such a concept. 
Omnipresence would mean then that everywhere something exists, presence is required for it to exist, hence God's omnipresence. Very clever sir. Obviously that would mean that nothing exists outside of God's presence. 

Now this is where it gets interesting, to isolate consciousness there must be form! if conscious awareness is to have any point of reference to a specific location it must be confined to a form within creation. Consciousness then must be isolated to have an individual experience as one perceiving time and space within that simulation through a body. This creates individual perception obviously. If God wants a soul for example, to experience Its creation God would have to confine that conscious soul to a body within a created world. This is where we see consciousness existing within bodies within our universe, which of course creates the illusion that consciousness is dependent upon form, or created by a brain. But actuality it is the opposite, the body and brain simply confine conscious experience to a located point of reference they do not create consciousness they simply conduct it as components, but consciousness precedes any bodies within creation. This means that the soul first originates with God not any embodiment.

Moving on temporarily are you basically saying then that the soul and God are essentially of the same nature? or of the same substance? I will get back to you a bit later on, this is a very interesting discussion. 

EtrnlVw
EtrnlVw's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,869
3
3
5
EtrnlVw's avatar
EtrnlVw
3
3
5
Moving on are you basically saying then that the soul and God are essentially of the same nature? or of the same substance?

That's right, because consciousness is only of the very same fundamental substance, property or source, there is no other source. It cannot be anything else and is not created by anything else......The soul comes out of God as an expression of Its own creativity and is then sent and confined to bodies within created worlds to become an individual consciousness. A tiny version of Itself! That soul then is like a seed, like a baby where everything it learns and experiences is confined by the body it occupies and the world it inhabits. For that time, located within time and space it perceives through the senses of that occupied vessel.

 I will get back to you a bit later on, this is a very interesting discussion. 

No sweat, thanks for being considerate, I'll await your replies :)
BrotherDThomas
BrotherDThomas's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,140
3
3
7
BrotherDThomas's avatar
BrotherDThomas
3
3
7



.
ETRNLVW,  who is "pretending" to be a Christian upon this forum,

Barring the fact that your biography has ZERO content, which is revealing enough to say that you are too embarrassed to tell the membership in what division of Christianity you follow, and in giving further information of same, you continue to run away from my posts to you? Why?  I have easily shown you in the following links of just how Bible stupid and ignorant you truly are, is that the reason you do not address the posts to you below?


Your continued blathering upon topics that you "think" you know is non-stop, but only when I and others bring your Bible ignorance to the forefront, do you RUN AWAY from your faith! LOL

ETRNLVW, now stay in true form and continue to run away from the links above, and think, what does this tell you about your faith?


.







7 days later

Mandrakel
Mandrakel's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 144
0
2
2
Mandrakel's avatar
Mandrakel
0
2
2
-->
@EtrnlVw
How big is God?
Mandrakel
Mandrakel's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 144
0
2
2
Mandrakel's avatar
Mandrakel
0
2
2
-->
@Tradesecret
God is a soul and he gives us a soul. We are all part of God so that is why we have a soul and proves that God is in fact a soul.