everything is debateable

Author: n8nrgmi

Posts

Total: 37
Trent0405
Trent0405's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 469
3
9
11
Trent0405's avatar
Trent0405
3
9
11
-->
@Reece101
Allow me to clarify. Presuming definitions are established beforehand, certain things are, by definition, true, thus making them practically undebatable.
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,907
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Trent0405
Practically undebatable, or undebatable? 

Trent0405
Trent0405's avatar
Debates: 33
Posts: 469
3
9
11
Trent0405's avatar
Trent0405
3
9
11
-->
@Reece101
I would say that these things might as well be the same thing. I suppose you could argue that bachelors are married, as in it would be physically possible for 2 people to talk about it, but such a conversation would require an unprecedented level of ignorance and/or absurdity.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,259
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
@RatMan.

Mod's used to wear parkas and ride scooters.

Things have changed.

Though a few old men still go out, high days and holidays, on their beloved Lambretta's.

Belching two-stroke.

To reclaim Brighton's seafront.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,283
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@n8nrgmi
if you think there are things that are not debateable, what are some examples? 
the apophatic phaneron.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,264
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@oromagi
relativity requires an observer and observed- at least two positions in space.
More than one position in space disproves singularity.
"Unity is plural and at a minimum two"...Bucky Fuller

The minimal 3D defined space is a tetra{4}hedron.   We can conceptually sub-divided the tetrahedron eternally ergo multiplication-by-division LINK of a finite whole, and, in so doing, we still can never ever have less than the 26 characteristics that define a tetra{4}hedron.

12 surface angles,

6 edges,

4 openings

4 vertexes

ergo 3D volume of ever decreasing size and physicall speaking any such subdivision ultra-micro occupied space, is limited by the amount of energy one can accumulate --from a finite Universe--   and directly go the next level of sub-division { quantization }.

Any talk of infinite sub-division ---Bucky Fuller himself speculated--- inherently incurs an eternal process of doing so. I dont think Universe does that.

The area of the spherical cubo{6}-oct{8}ahedrons four equatorial bisections, is equal to the surface area of that spherical cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron. Archimedes was first to discover this fact and in some ways reflects what we know about black holes, i.e. what is inside a black hole is expressed on its event horizon surface.

There is an eternally existent finite set of Metaphysical1, cosmic principles, that, complement the eternally existent set of possible occupied space manifestations.

There can never ever exist more than the finite set of five, regular/symmetrical, and convex polyhedra. Better chance that toyotas that breed purple magic Unicorns, tho my guess is that is also and impossible occupied Space occurrence.


Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
-->
@n8nrgmi
Everything is debatable. Extending arguments/propositions to their logical conclusions however is not influenced.