Reflection on January 6th

Author: Double_R

Posts

Total: 106
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@bmdrocks21
The riots throughout the summer were 100% forced from the top-down. The cause was less rapid than the singular event on Jan 6, but the lies spread in the media about high-profile cases over a course of about half a decade led to that rioting.
First of all, the idea that this came from the media is nonsense. The number of people being killed by police has not risen significantly over the past decade. What has changed is the fact that ordinary people now have the ability to capture this and spread it without the media being needed. This is why all the high profile cases were being catapulted into the mainstream. It didn’t come from the media, the media was forced to report on it because of the backlash this was getting by anyone with a smart phone.

Second, even if we grant this premise that it came from the media, the argument still fails. The media didn’t plot anything. There was no end game to reporting on these police incidents. There was no date where the media said “hey everyone, come on down on this date and stop this”. If Derek Shovin hadn’t killed George Floyd in broad daylight in the slowest most cruel way possible, it's likely none of the riots would have happened.

Third, “the media” is just a lazy catch all phrase uttered by right wingers who love to pretend that what’s going on on the left is any different than the right. We can argue all day about which side of the spectrum is actually doing the lying here, but right wing news plays no less of a role than left wing news in ginning up the base. What’s different about the right vs the left on these two issues is the fact that right wing politicians were also front and center in inciting this, which is who I’m talking about when I talk about “the top”. 

These two things are not even close.

But exactly how was democracy threatened?
January 6th was not a spontaneous event. If you actually want to understand how and why this is so bad you need context.

Again, it was not pushed by some vague notion like "the media". The one person who pushed all of this and whom none of this would have happened without was the president of the United States.

January 6th was the culmination of a months long effort by him to hold power no matter what the voters decided. When they rejected him, it was only onto the next step. At that point it was him making use of stochastic terrorism, and once the probable outcome occurred he was not punished for it. That, is why democracy is in serious danger at the moment. Because of people like you pretending there was nothing to see here while those who were behind inciting it continue to learn from their mistakes and set the stage for the next election.

Sounds only somewhat bad to me.
This is just disingenuous. If it were antifa beating police officers on their way to the Chambers of Congress to stop a Trump certification you would be grabbing you're pitchfork and torch and you know it.

That hostile force? No guns, no killing.
So beating police officers, busting through police barricades protecting the US Capitol, smashing windows to get in, vandalizing the US Capitol while chanting to hang the vice president, and forcing Congress to hide in bunkers while they were supposed to be certifying an election is not a hostile force? Is this a joke?

The president told them to go home on the day of.
After three hours of the entire world watching in horror. After there hours of everyone from Kevin McCarthy to Ivanka Trump to Sean Hannity and Laura Ingram pleading with him to put a stop to it.

How many hours of this before a president Hillary Clinton told antifa to go home would you have been ok with?

This is both why I am so fascinated by this topic and yet why it's such a pointless effort. It just amazes me watching people twist themselves in pretzels to make arguments they don't believe.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@ILikePie5
It’s all optics for them. Just look at the “mostly peaceful protests.” Same scenario here
And what were the mostly peaceful protesters on January 6th protesting?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
So beating police officers, busting through police barricades protecting the US Capitol, smashing windows to get in, vandalizing the US Capitol while chanting to hang the vice president, and forcing Congress to hide in bunkers while they were supposed to be certifying an election is not a hostile force? Is this a joke?

Compared to someone getting their brains smashed in by a bicycle lock or having their business burned down, yes it is a joke.

Also getting shot in the throat by an unaccountable rogue police officer.

If more people had a fraction of the concern for their fellow Americans as they seemingly do for all of their elected DC politicians, maybe this wouldn't have happened in the first place. This attitude of protecting the DC rules for thee only encourages more of the same.

The only people with gunpowder on your Guy Fawkes night were the DC police.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
And what were the mostly peaceful protesters on January 6th protesting?

The same thing Anti-trumpers were. Tyranny.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ILikePie5
The Democrats and their propaganda arm in the media are willfully misleading the American populace.
"Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?"

-some incoherent Democrat in 2022.

At a time when people are upset about voter integrity, there is only one party doing everything they can to make voting less secure and less reliable and less accountable to the states. The ruling party of course.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 12,747
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Greyparrot
-some incoherent Democrat in 2022.
You mean the one that was buddies with segregationists?
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
Compared to someone getting their brains smashed in by a bicycle lock or having their business burned down...
There was nothing in the question, implicit or explicit, asking January 6th to be compared to the summer riots. Why are you guys so incapable of talking about January 6th without immediately deflecting to whataboutisms?

If it were antifa acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton would your attitude towards 1/6 be a complete 180 from what it is now? Everyone on this site this knows it would be.

What is it about politics that shuts off that switch enabling logical reasoning and acknowledgement of reality to be prioritized?

You really want to know what's different about 1/6 and the riots? There political side associated with the riots rejects them and the side associated with 1/6 does not. How many left wing politicians had a problem talking about rioting and looting not being acceptable? Very few. And look at NYC, who in the wake of all this elected a pro-police cop to be they're next mayor. The left already rejects this nonsense, so all you guys are talking to the wall.

The right meanwhile has elevated nearly everyone in support of everything the Capitol mob was trying to accomplish to their own leadership. One senator calls the rioters terrorists and had to go apologize to Tucker Carlson on national TV. And the man behind it all remains the leading candidate for the next presidential nomination.

The whataboutisms are just plain stupid. These two things are not remotely the same.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Double_R
These two things are not remotely the same.

You are right. Jan 6 is a joke of the highest 1st world problems meme. The summer of love was an actual horror show.

 And look at NYC,
NYC isn't a part of America anymore with their recent decision to include non-citizens in the political process. They are now an autonomous international port.
ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 12,747
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
J6 was a mostly peaceful protest
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
@ILikePie5
If you were to start a thread on the “summer of love” I would have plenty to say about it without having to appeal to constant whataboutisms. That’s what it looks like when someone actually believes the things they say.
ResurgetExFavilla
ResurgetExFavilla's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 627
3
2
7
ResurgetExFavilla's avatar
ResurgetExFavilla
3
2
7
I thought it was hilarious aside from the poor gal who got shot. Personally a big fan of desecrating big lies, like the idea that a governing body with an approval rating that rises into the 20s every few years is a temple to democracy. It's a masonic lodge with better furniture and uglier women.
thett3
thett3's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 2,005
3
2
7
thett3's avatar
thett3
3
2
7
I have a take that will bother both sides: 

The J6 protestors/rioters who were arrested are being subjected to cruel and appalling treatment in prison, totally out of line with the crimes committed and in violation of the states obligation to treat people with basic decency 

This is true for almost all prisons/prisoners in the US, there is a lot of unnecessary cruelty and disgusting conditions 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,038
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@thett3
I take it as a cautionary tale about how abusive DC can be if you track mud on their doorstep.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@ILikePie5
If it’s an insurrection, why wasn’t anyone charged with?

Calling it an insurrection is a lie if no one was charged and convicted with it

If there is, as you and Democrats proclaim, a conspiracy to commit insurrection, then there should be at least one charge along those lines
Are we done with this talking point now?


ILikePie5
ILikePie5's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 12,747
3
7
10
ILikePie5's avatar
ILikePie5
3
7
10
-->
@Double_R
I don’t see an insurrection charge anywhere. Nor do I see conspiracy to commit insurrection
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 4,278
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@ILikePie5
Definition of sedition
: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority