Moral theory does not allow a woman to choose
Yes, it does.
freedom from govt. restraint does.
Government doesn't have the right to "restrain." It assumes this authority through coercion.
Just because I argue that Republicans have no right to make that choice
for women does not mean that I think there's a morally coherent
justification for choosing abortion.
You're about to unwittingly broach a coherent moral concept.
I'm not sure there is but I feel compelled to withhold judgement
because that is not a choice I'll ever have to face biologically. I do
believe that decision is only the pregnant woman's to make
This, my friend, is an expression of individualist moral theory.
and that if that woman chooses life than the father is obligated
morally- he is not burdened with gestation so his choices ended at
inception.
If the mother isn't compelled to act in service to her fetus, why should the father be?
Our freedom to choose is limited by the harm we might inflict on others
and the harm an absent father inflicts on a child outweighs any claim to
harm that father might claim.
Can't the same be said of abortion?
I'm no student for philosophy but I don't think I buy voluntarism by itself as a morally coherent notion.
Voluntarism by itself is coherent. You've even expressed some of it yourself:
Our freedom to choose is limited by the harm we might inflict on others
