'Ethnic genocide' is used correctly by you only if we realise ethnicity not physical.
Ethnicity certainly has a physical aspect of ancestry, heritage, or lineage. Especially when we are talking in the context of the nation. I don't know what you mean by framing ethnicity as entirely conceptual as some sort of definitional matter. We know that ethnicity, culture, and race are in fact tightly correlated in reality.
Erm, that is the entire problem? That is a racial-normative perspective and even the very parents of children in those cultures and siblings commit it. They say 'you are one of us' and even commit honour killings at their worst, alongside abuse beforehand, to blackmail in particular the females but also the males to keel and obey their ways of life.
I am 0% suggesting stopping mixing of races genetically or restricting racial immigration of any kind at all. I am specifically speaking about pressuring integration of cultures that are brutally conservative to such an extreme degree that doesn't fit with our modern western ways, rather than let them quietly abuse behind closed doors and brainwash their children into extreme outlooks.
There should be strong pressure against subcultures and shanty towns forming, it should be true integration, why should you feel uncomfortable if your neighbours are not your particular subculture? I find it very peculiar that things like 'chinatown' and 'koreatown' even exist and worry for what that means for the integration of immigrants if they can't integrate properly and embrace the new culture and place they've resided in. I have no beef with it at all unless the core values of the culture as so anti-progressive that it runs completley concurrent to where we see as a morally good direction for society to move in.
Set foot in one of their countries and try to push your liberal agenda or libertarian agenda, try to be so arrogant as to get a group of Americans and form an 'Americatown' inside thier culture without integrating. They will simply be bemused and leave you isolated. Then, try and teach them that beating theri children as a means of discipline is wrong and you can find yourself beaten bloody as a 'stay the fuck out of our business, we run things our way' warning or you will simply be alienated to the point where you can't live in a place locally at all and are forced out unless you want to remain homeless.
So when you say genocide of an ethnicity you are using flavorful language to mean a culture defending itself against unwanted pollution from cultures that have direct core value clashes.
I would say that the idea that a culture is "defending itself" from the mere existence of another culture, is itself flavorful language.
Existence? What is it you are talking about here? The prevalence (which starts as a snowball effect from untouched presence and influence) of Sharia is not welcome in western cultures and will lead to sexism, homophobia, transphobia, fascistic attitudes and plenty more. Which 'cultural existence' is it that I had particular issue with? Can you be precise?
Can you be clear on what you are suggesting I am advocating.
I would like you to wonder what happens in the long run if all these cultures defend themselves ethnically (and they do, they are all very ethnocentric internally, set foot in their countries as an immigrant and you will be brutally pressured to accept their way of life and held at arm's length as an outsider, the white supremacy in the western world is the normal nationalist and ethnic pride held in other cultures immigrating to the Western countries).
You are erasing and ignoring all of the differences between those cultures. "White culture" or "Western culture" etc., have a very different structure, geopolitical status, and history, from any other culture. Being that, all of the "ethnicities" you speak about by necessity, exist within the paradigm of the "nation-state" created, enforced, and maintained by the Western culture which then "defends itself" against them.
What are you talking about? All cultures had a different structure, geopolitical status and history to other cultures. In fact, America is one of the youngest cultures there are so what do you mean by 'history'? Do you mean you don't know how racist and barbaric Sharia regimes were? Or how racist and barbaric Japanese Samurai/Shogun were and Mongolian warriors under Genghis Khan were or like what are you referring to? Do yo uknwo of the Ming Dynasty and the way people were treated? Which culture? Indian Caste system or what? I am not sure which culture was free of the dark side of humanity in terms of what I'm getting at here.
I am left-wing and progressive to the core and I know that the Conservative white locals in our western cultures are overall tame af in their ideology compared to the equivalent innthe very nations that these immigrants are coming from and it is about time we stop demonising and start uniting and negotiating.
Apparently since you are left-wing and liberal, and you think these other cultures are inherently against left-wing liberals, doesn't that make you a "Western" supremacist? A lot of what you are saying hangs on this tenuous distinction between ethnicity and race.
I do not think that they are against left-wing liberals, I know it and they are passionately proud of it. Travel and ask them if you want, make a documentary of their answers. Ask them about patriarchal heteronormative roles (in language they can understand, even better translate to the local language for precise communication and answers if you're willing to put in the time and learn) and the answers will no doubt in my mind drop your jaw. Ask them about gay marriage rights, ask them about what the solution to poverty and favelas/ghettos/slums etc are.
I never mentioned race once in our entire conversation, you suddenly brought in eugenics out of nowhere.
