The World Economic Forum Plans To Use Pandemic Infrastructure To Rewrite People's DNA

I am right. You are wrong. You should practice basic math so you learn more. You will still burn in hell. You misunderstood the Bible. You have committed crimes against the Lord.

Well, apparently you're not. Since you agreed with me just 4 comments ago.

As you burn in hell, you will have plenty of time to figure out why you are wrong.

Are we going to kiss and cry now? No.

Cool thanks for admitting you don't exist. I rest my case.

You will rest in hell. God has already sharpened his sword for you.

Coming from an account that doesn't exist, this means absolutely nothing.

You will get no mercy. You will cry. You will be tortured forever in hell.

Al on my phone tells me that I need to forgive to those who I hate.

I forgive you. You will still be tortured eternally in hell. 

Overpopulation is a non-issue. We should maintain healthcare to maintain a health and happy population.

Population is a huge issue that is avoided or overlooked by most people

And healthy and happy are fleeting moments in mundane lives.

And healthcare is subject to the vagaries of wealth, power and genetic instructions..

How one evaluates the necessity of personhood, depends upon how one evaluates the purpose or intention of Universal progression.

And for sure, as single units most will always be hellbent on survival right here, right now with no real thought of the greater future.

The future is potentially a long time, and Planet  Earth's resources are not unlimited.

So do you think that the human species or the essence of humanity will have migrated before the Earth clock stops ticking?

I think there's a strong chance that we will have (in some form). Maybe it's an evolutionary certainty (Universal evolution).

Or do you think that everything is purposeless?

Well, as I see it, it's 50/50 chance or purpose.

1. Birthrates level out with human development. Education, income, and healthcare make birthrates go down naturally, as is shown with all first world nations. This means that even if you did think overpopulation was a legitimate issue, you'd support human development, like healthcare.

2. Earth's limited resources is because of unsustainable ways of engaging in extraction, production, and consumption. We could create sustainable economies, and those kinds of shifts are better than simple leaving the rock.

Yep, a lot of sensible stuff there.

Though I'm not sure that levelling out birth rates relative to increased decrepitude relative to over-dependency on healthcare is a good way forwards.

And globally we're a long way from that level of sustainability of population, relative to consensus and any sort of global cooperation.

Time will tell I suppose.