Unnamed site member, will you sit still or try?

Author: RationalMadman

Posts

Total: 12
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
We can see the USM is afraid to make a move. Terrified, paralysed and trembling as a Novice and a Madman come for the throne he has rested idle upon for much longer than deserved.

Will the champ make a move or silently wither away? The era of cowards sitting still at the top is soon to be abolished; move or perish, rise or fall that is the way of the competitive debater.

I wonder what would happen if Mike, the admin/owner, introduced Rating decay for every 14 days of debate inactivity muahahaha what would the ex-champs turned timid sideline sitters do?

This is the new era! A new #1 soon, perhaps new #2 above USM.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 50
Posts: 2,888
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
I’d support ELO decay.

Similarly, I’d support there being a half dozen different rating scales (from a data mining perspective, it could be a treasure trove!).
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Barney
As a supremely active voter, you have sideline sitting privilege.

All other sideline sitters shall kneel before the risk takers. You need only bow your head.
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@RationalMadman
Is USM to avoid being characterized as a call-out thread? It seems supremely obvious who this is addressed to.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@K_Michael
Sorry, I will stick to making 0 worthwhile or hot content like most of the site.
K_Michael
K_Michael's avatar
Debates: 38
Posts: 749
4
5
10
K_Michael's avatar
K_Michael
4
5
10
-->
@RationalMadman
I'm not opposed to the content, just making sure I understood the decision correctly. I tend to misunderstand socially motivated decisions more often than others.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 4,188
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
Seems like a call out
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Barney
I’d support ELO decay.
then you would be more irrelevant than you already are

Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 4,228
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@Barney
I don't. All that does is encourage users to quit debating once they take a hiatus. Not everyone has the IRL time to be on this site frequently. And I also believe the skills of the best debaters should be recognized. This includes past debaters.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Mharman
Based on something you posted elsewhere, it is clear to me this isn't obvious:

I am joking here, I am not angry or furious or really abusing anyone, especially Barney. This is a drama post, chill out... Or as I said there, don't.

Just clarifying, not trying cross-thread contamination.

63 days later

PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
I would support rating decay TBH