You constantly accuse me of making logical fallacies. Yet at the same time I very consistently assert that you don't really know what I'm talking about.
How do you reconcile this with your so called knowledge of epistemological limitations?
Maybe instead of adopting the attitude of "I know I don't know, I know I can't know, and I know no one can know, I know better.", you should adopt the attitude of "I don't know, maybe".
If you did this, you might even come to understand things. Right now, you tell me what I am saying, you tell me what I believe. When I try to correct you, there is resistance. Why? Because you have nothing to learn from me. If this is the case, why bother even having a discussion with me? If you have made up your mind and I see you as arrogant and foolish, what else is there?
If being right is so important to you, be righteouus about it.
Say, "I don't know, maybe"
And if you are going to try and refute what I believe, at least come to understand it first. You assume you know, so you don't learn. You don't understand as a result.
And my intent here is to do nothing but help you, I'm not trying to make myself feel smart, impress other people, or entertain myself. I am here to educate. As wild as that may seem, that is the truth. I don't enjoy arguing with people. Sometimes it feels like an exercise in masochism. But it is for the sake of love, a love that isn't likely to be understood, because it is my will that everyone come to knowledge of The Truth.
And that includes you. Not for my benefit, for I hve nothing to gain. But for your benefit.
