The women that have sex tend to do so because of male peer pressure. You probably have had sex with females; they have sex because of men like you. If you don’t want females having sex, lead by example and don’t have sex with them.
No, it's because women put themselves around bad people in bad situations.
The amount of women who get abortions because of rape, is very low.
"
Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute."
So the rest are a cause of just pure convenience. You are using peer pressure as the reason for abortions being ok? Peer pressure is something that high schoolers have to deal with. Adults should and already should have learned that peer pressure is not a threat to them. At the end of the day, it is a woman's decisions to have sex with a man, unless it is a rape.
Unfortunately, people are pro recreational sex.
Again, I am not against recreational sex. I am against having sex willingly and aborting a baby just for convenience. Yes you want to have sex without bearing a child, and most of the time, you won't have to, but it's still a risk you have to take and if that risk shows up, you are going to have to accept it.
And also it’s possible that females continue to have sex regardless of the penalty for abortion. If many females are doing this, you are going to have to execute a lot of females. It would make arguably more sense to execute both the female that got the abortion and the man who had sex with her.
Again, having recreational sex wouldn't be illegal. Getting abortions would be.
You really think women are going to get the same amount if not more abortions, even when life in prison, or the death penalty is on the line. Not even that, just the thought of even 20 years in prison would stop a woman from doing it.
That’s why I think whatever the penalty for abortion is should effect both parents of the aborted baby equally, so my ideal penalty is $1.3 a day for a decade (paid for by both parents of the aborted baby). 90% of the revenue goes to sponsor a starving child, getting that child out of poverty, and the remaining 10% pays for the abortion. If you take a life from abortion, you should be legally required to save a life by some other method (and child sponsorship is a cheap way to save a life).
If the father paid for the abortion, then yes he should be punished to, but if he didn't then he didn't do anything wrong. Most fathers don't want there wives to get abortions. Also if the father knows about the abortion being taken place, and doesn't tell authorities, then that is witness to a murder, without telling anyone, and could be considered manslaughter. So it would only be the husbands fault in some cases.
Paying off debt even in history has not always worked out the best.
And the claim that a zygote is a human being doesn’t make sense because of the following rationale: 30 to 70 percent of zygotes fail to attach to the uterine wall, so they miscarry basically. If a pregnant female miscarries a 12 week fetus, she will be devestated. If she miscarried a zygote, she won’t be the slightest bit upset. If she was and she gave birth to 3 kids, she would probably be upset about losing about 3 kids due to zygotes miscarrying. No female I met is sad about the zygotes she miscarried. If it was a 12 week fetus that they miscarried, then she would be upset. But this leads me to believe the zygote and the 12 week fetus aren’t equal.
This is a false claim. Miscarriage's only happen in 10-20% of all pregnancy's.
A woman will be devastated if she miscarries at all. You think a woman won't be devastated if she miscarries a zygote/human? How can you make that assumption?
If a zygote is not a human being, then what is it?
