Elon Musk is destroying Twitter and it’s stock price

• Those who get their news from Chinese brain control apps deserve their enslavement.

The numbers I have seen recently shows

• numbers found on Twitter, so they must be true.

• That false rumor was started by Billy Marks, CEO of DogeCoin on Nov 7th and Elon Musk.  Are you only getting your information from Elon?
  
• Marks and Musk are together facing a racketeering lawsuit claiming $258 in losses when they crashed that DogeCoin pyramid scheme.

A member of the antifa organization tried to attack his child. I think it's suitable for him to protect his child from lunatics.

• Again, Elon Musk is the ONLY source that back this claim.  Here is Musk's LOL video of the "attack on his son."
  
• Strange that Musk never reported the attack to police and never filed a report.  He did contact TMZ.
  

I haven't seen this occur and if so I wonxer what they actually said prior to bans. Company secrets etc.

• "I don't want to sacrifice my mental health just to make the richest man in the world richer."

Maybe not personal vendettas but I would consider banning based on political speech you disagree with is worse than doing it for a personal vendetta.

• We both know that's a lie. You have zero problem with removing black speech from Florida schools, advocating big goverment intervention in local schools because and only because that big government is white and male and the teacher and librarians (who we both know are a thousand times better at teaching childen than QAnon whack jobs).  Try your lazy amoral bullshit on someone who knows you less well.
  

If I lose the IQ test I will kill myself for being stupider than you

• No and please go fuck yourself for trying to insert your lies in my mouth.  I'm saying there's no evidence that Musk's son was attacked- Musk's vid does not support the claim of attack and the fact that he was afraid to go to cops with his lie but not afraid to go to TMZ  is highly suspcious. In the absence of any evidence whatsover, I assume Musk is telling yet another of his many, many paranoid lies.
  

I mean, if you consider a bunch of Jews white. 

• Ron DeSantis is Jewish?  I did not know that.
  

There is always some non zero chance of something else other than what the most popular belief is, being true. 

• Nice excuse for the sin of knowingly bearing false witness whenever you think you can get away it.
  

Okay so how would you determine the Holocaust is true? You would repeat it? 

• Survivors' testimonies: Many Holocaust survivors have given first-hand accounts of their experiences during the genocide, including their imprisonment in concentration and extermination camps, the brutality of the Nazi regime, and the atrocities they witnessed.
  
• Nazi documentation: The Nazi regime kept meticulous records of their operations, including detailed records of the concentration and extermination camps, as well as other forms of documentation such as photographs and videos.
  
• Eyewitness accounts: Many non-Jewish people, including soldiers, civilians, and members of the resistance, witnessed the Holocaust firsthand and provided accounts of what they saw.
  
• Physical evidence: There is a significant amount of physical evidence that supports the occurrence of the Holocaust, including the concentration and extermination camps themselves, mass graves, and other sites of atrocities.
  
• Historical research: Historians have extensively researched the Holocaust, examining primary sources, conducting interviews, and analyzing other evidence to confirm its occurrence.
  

I have never had an ability to sense truth.

• Because you're using the wrong sense organ.
  

• Another lie you put in my mouth.  I've never said such a thing.
  

• Another falsehood.  I certainly defend more free speech than you do.  You only defend free speech that corrupts.
  

There is no amount of things surrounding what was released that would justify the DNC and the government trying to control speech and access to information. 

• But as Matt Taibbi's Twitter Files explained to you and your corrupt heart failed to comprehend:  there is no truth to your false filthy lie.
  
• That is the real reason Musk is ejecting Taibbi:  he refused to tell you the lie Musk wanted you to hear.

• How about every time you put words into my mouth, I get to call it rape?  I am saying that there's no evidence that Musk's son was attacked and good reason to asume Musk was merely lying.
  

• False mentally ill extremism.   Belief is irrelevent and there are as many possible beliefs as stories you could make up about why a dude is sitting in his car.  The only fact and quite obvious to every honest man is that the video Musk claims is documenting an attack does not suggest an attack in any way- its just an unidentified man sitting in his car.
  

I think your claim was about a bunch of white people as you call them, not a specific one who happens to be a zionist non Jew.

• I was talking about all that corrupt big government intrusion that you support into Florida's schools and libraries.

• You mean like "there are only two possible theories tht might explain a video of an unidentified stranger sitting in his car: 
  
• he is either attacking a two year old son or
  
• Musk staged an attack on his two year son.
  
• You constantly make definitive statement in your slavish pursuit to distort every truth.

• False and quite dim-witted.  Every one of those methodologies is a repitition of the truth, tested by consistency.

Because you're using the wrong sense organ

• The most honest thing you've ever said:  for you truth is play-doh you use to troll people.
  

• Well, then let's agree you have no business trying to represent a group of rational debaters.  By your own words, you are not qualified to assess the actions of your fellow debaters.
  

• I don't assert such a role but you do.
  

• I don't.  I let objective sources like Wikipedia set a standard for information/disinformation.
  

• Opposite of the truth.  I think the Musk should show the people all of Twitter's internal documents.  Musk controls which documents he wants you to read and selecting particular reporters to report his select info the way he wants you to believe.
  

• Pure crazy talk.  Look at that story about Liz Harris.  You literally defended the conspiracy theorist without having done any basic research.  You didn't know that her theory had been presented in many courts and venues,  you didn't know that she was claiming a conspiracy between MAGA Republicans, the Church of Latter Day Saints and the Sinoloa Drug Cartel.  All you knew is that she is a prominent part of QAnon and that kind of disinformation is your religion- so you believed her and supported her without any interest in the detail of her claim.  You only ever defend free speech when you know for a fact that speech is fucking with the truth.

If there ever is any coordinated effort to suppress certain truths under my system it would never happen, under yours organizations such as the WHO get to decide what information people have access to . 

• I believe in the honest expertise of most professionals and take their word in preference to people who lie for a living.  Yes, Fauci is more honest and informative than Joe Rogan.  Yes, Republican Secretaries of State are more honest and informative than the Mattress King.
  

This sounds like you are claiming that the government and the DNC never reached out to Twitter about content they wanted removed or with "warnings" about coming information just prior to the hunter Biden laptop leaks? 

• No it doesn't, liar.  I am disputing your claim that the Trump administration and DNC controlling free speech and accesss to information.  As your scumbag's  retreat to "reached out to Twitter" demonstrates you already know, Taibbi documents that the Trump adminstration and the Biden Campaign both frequently reached out to Twitter but no "control" was ever exerted by the government and the Biden administation had no power to exert.  Every decision made by Twitter was made free from government coercion, was openly declared and documented, and no secrets about that decision were withheld from the public.  

• Notice how far you've sprinted from your original claim of CONTROL.  A more honest and forthright debate topic would be "Twitter never violated  any user's First Ammendment Right, contrary to claims made by Elon Musk"
  
• If "reaching out" meant the same thing as control, Donald Trump would have been executed for treason as soon as the Mueller report documented 172 secret meetings between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign and the thousand of lies the Trump Campaign told covering up for those secret meetings.  There is no doubt that Putin reached out to Trump hundreds of times in the months just before Trump became Presdident, but because only massive piles of circumstantial evidence suggests that Trump did Putin's bidding while President (i.e. control).  
  
• Please apologize for weaseling "control" into "reaching out," you slimy worm, you.