"teen shot after accidentally" the next liberal psy-op

Author: PREZ-HILTON

Posts

Total: 131
#61
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Um, you’re not even American toots
Glad you finally realized. Only took me telling you a couple of times.

so you can’t make anyone feel inadequate 
You are inadequate, naturally.

your wee woman brain, (do they let women go to school in your country?)
If I'm so dumb and uneducated, what does it say about you when I had to correct you many times?

was really on display when you made your false assumptions about the 2016 election and needed me (or some other guy) to explain it too you.
I had to explain to you four times over a day how to make the argument you were trying to make. You're the only who was instructed like a little child, tiny guy.

So, no kids though? That would be hard to deal with if true no doubt. Some people say, including a lot of women, that a woman without children is a curse.
It's fine. I've got plenty of time.

Much better situation than being a malding, sexist lil dude who has his knickers severely twisted over being schooled by a woman.
#62
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
I had to correct you many times?
You corrected me by telling me you made false assumptions in your uninformed opinion and needed me to educate you? 


You're the only who was instructed like a little child,
I’m the only who? A child? It seems you don’t know anything about children because god didn’t want you to be a Mom.

It's fine. I've got plenty of time.
You’re not as young as you think. A woman’s expiration date comes up pretty fast. Take this friendly advice though - always remember, A moment on the lips, a lifetime on the hips.

sexist? Well that didn’t take long for you to cry sexism. Poor, poor victim. 

knickers? You must be a Brit, otherwise you must be over 50. But as a self declared White Nationalist I would guess you are South African.
#63
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I had to correct you many times?
You corrected me by telling me you made false assumptions in your uninformed opinion and needed me to educate you? 
Your original argument was that the U.S. election was close because there was a difference of 80,000 votes in the end. I told you that U.S. election isn't contested based on popular vote, so I forced you to make the argument that broke down the 80,000 votes are distrusted across several states, to show the relative percentages. 

That's what I forced you to do, and you did it like a good boy.

You're the only who was instructed like a little child,
I’m the only who? A child? It seems you don’t know anything about children because god didn’t want you to be a Mom.
I'm not religious, either.

What was that about false assumptions again?

It's fine. I've got plenty of time.
You’re not as young as you think. A woman’s expiration date comes up pretty fast. Take this friendly advice though - always remember, A moment on the lips, a lifetime on the hips.
And how old do you think I am? 

I'm old enough to have you malding and bent out of shape over being corrected. Perhaps you should invest in bunch-free underwear from now on.

#64
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Your original argument was that the U.S. election was close because there was a difference of 80,000 votes in the end. I told you that U.S. election isn't contested based on popular vote,
But only an imbecile wouldn’t know that the electoral votes are the result of state by state popular votes. I didn’t know you were an imbecile until later.

I’m the only who?
You missed my point about you failing to use proper grammar when trying to take your feeble female shot.

I'm old enough to have you malding
But you are a big advocate for proof, right? And now you are just grasping for straws thinking you are able to cause balding with your rapier like girlie wit
#65
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
sexist? Well that didn’t take long for you to cry sexism. Poor, poor victim. 
You are clearly sexist lol.

knickers? You must be a Brit, otherwise you must be over 50. But as a self declared White Nationalist I would guess you are South African.
Yeah, knickers. Your big granny knickers that get twisted so much they end up looking like a thong hahaha

I'm not over 50 and my nationalist doesn't matter in the context of this conversation.

Your original argument was that the U.S. election was close because there was a difference of 80,000 votes in the end. I told you that U.S. election isn't contested based on popular vote,
But only an imbecile wouldn’t know that the electoral votes are the result of state by state popular votes. I didn’t know you were an imbecile until later.
Only a bigger imbecile wouldn't break down the electoral votes state by state and show percentage wins, along with how wins in those states would have made a difference in the overall election. Only a bigger imbecile would simply post "80,000 therefore close" and not realize the folly in that argument.
#66
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
You are clearly sexist lol.
Clearly. Can a woman be sexist or are they just victims of sexism? Poor, frail, helpless victims. Damsels really, in distress.

I'm not over 50 and my nationalist doesn't matter in the context of this conversation.
Ya, White nationalist.

I believe the word you were searching for was nationality, but again, the wee woman brain thing.

would simply post "80,000 therefore close" and not realize the folly in that argument.
wrong again tootsie. Now you are reduced to misquoting me to salvage your case.  “He won by a total margin of 80,000 votes in 3 states and he actually lost the overall popular vote” It’s the point made in the Washington Post article as well. Do you have real newspapers in your country?
#67
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Now question:

Do you think I said you’re an imbecile because you’re a woman or because of the stupid things you’ve said?

List of stupid things written by Kaitlyn

She’s a self-described White Nationalist 

She declares “I'm surprised that people read or listen to any news media at all” and “I don't trust either of those stories to be told accurately at all”

She falsely claimed that Trump won “comfortably in 2016, apparently not understanding how electoral votes are awarded.

She defended an ardent neo-Nazi, who joked about Hitler and Jews a bit.

There’s more but I hate to pile on an imbecile 


#68
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
On March 15, a white nationalist in Christchurch, New Zealand, said, “Remember, lads, subscribe to PewDiePie” on his Facebook live stream, just before going on a shooting rampage, killing dozens of worshipers inside two mosques. A few weeks later, another violent white nationalist cited PewDiePie, this time in writing. In his manifesto, the suspect — accused of killing one woman and injuring three others at a synagogue in Poway, Calif. — even claimed that the YouTuber aided in the plot. “I had the help of a man named Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg,” wrote the shooting suspect, who, like the Christchurch suspect, has pleaded not guilty. “He was kind enough to plan and fund this whole operation — the sly bastard.”
Just to be abundantly clear: As far as we know, these were both sick jokes. Kjellberg has no connection to either man, and there is zero evidence that their deeds were actually inspired by him. But he was not a randomly chosen target either. For years, Kjellberg has been trying, fairly unsuccessfully, to shed a reputation as a far-right sympathizer. Partly, that’s because a few years ago, he made some Holocaust jokes on his channel, which led to a nuclear-grade backlash. And partly, it’s because Kjellberg responded to being called out for those jokes, and other offensive statements, the way a reactionary might: by mocking his critics, casting himself as the victim of a media smear campaign and refusing to back down.

So apparently White Nationalists are big fans of PewDiePie. But it’s totally innocuous. He’s not really anti-Semitic, he just thinks it’s funny to say anti-Semitic things and words don’t really matter, right?

this article was in The NY Times. Seems pretty fair to me.
#69
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
Divisive Biden is inviting black teen shot by old white man, but NEVER a white girl shot by a black male. Go figure. 
#70
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TWS1405_2
but NEVER a white girl shot by a black male. Go figure. 
Was the white girl shot after knocking on the black man’s door and he overreacted due to the constant fear mongering about white girls in this country?

I think I know why you were kicked out of the army after just a few years. You couldn’t keep your stupid redneck ideas to yourself 

#71
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
It never matters what you think, peanut brain stole. Valor douchebag. The only thing that matters is what you can prove. 

And to date all you have proven is what a pencil dick incel mamma’s boy (or cousin IT) troll you so clearly are. 

Prove me wrong. 

#72
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TWS1405_2
The only thing that matters is what you can prove. 
Oh you’re back to that again? Last time I brought that up you denied you ever said it.

Prove me wrong

#73
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Can prove you wrong cause I never said what you claim I said, or didn’t do. 

From day one here I’ve always put forth that what another feels, believes, thinks or subjectively surmises doesn’t matter one single iota. 

The only thing that matters is what one can actually prove, with actual facts, not stolen valor fiction. 
Topic's author
#74
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
Of course there's more to the story, but no matter what it is, the shooting was not justified, and the shooter is one of those "responsiible gun owners" you guys are always blathering about.  
Well if there is more to the story why are you pretending that it is the only thing to the story?

I wouldn't say the rest of the story is irrelevant.


What if the homeowner yelled at the parents to keep their ball out of the yard?

What if the parents then said something like STFU I will shoot your ass don't talk to us that way and then he put his hand in his pants to mime he has a gun and is about to pull it? 

There is 100 different possible scenarios and we just don't know enough to make the claims made in this thread about how the homeowner is agist against 6 year olds. 

As far as responsible gun owners is concerned. I never even mentioned mentioned it. You won't find a post of mine with those 2 words next to each other outside of this one. What type of retarded strawman is it to even claim pro gun people think every single person is a responsible gun owner?

The only way to avoid this type of scenario seems like a complete gun ban. If that's what you are arguing for let's set up a debate. You can't win because of how retarded the concept is, but we can do it. 
Topic's author
#75
PREZ-HILTON
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
Debates: 18
Posts: 2,806
3
4
9
PREZ-HILTON's avatar
PREZ-HILTON
3
4
9
Um, you’re not even American toots, so you can’t make anyone feel inadequate and your wee woman brain
A quote by Roosevelt. Why are. Liberals so sexist and racist
#76
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 28,019
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
He is no liberal. He is a party propaganda sheep.
#77
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 414
Posts: 12,563
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
@Iwantroosevelt

Was the white girl shot after knocking on the black man’s door and he overreacted due to the constant fear mongering about white girls in this country?
What? What does that even mean?

#78
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,516
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well that didn’t take long for you to cry sexism. Poor, poor victim. 
The right has weaponized victimhood.

"Angela Zamparo : Because when it comes down to it, there really is only one essential ingredient to fascism. 
Nate Foster : It's victimhood."
#79
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 28,019
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
They say, ‘Scratch a liberal, you’ll find a fascist’.
But scratch a fascist, you’ll find a communist;
scratch a communist, you’ll find an anarchist;
scratch an anarchist, you’ll find a feudalist;
scratch a feudalist, you’ll find a Roman Republican;
scratch a Roman Republican, you’ll find a democrat,
though he will be incredibly tiny.

#80
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
We can clearly see that you're trying quite hard to provoke me with lies and half-truths. I mean, you're doing this to the point of other people noticing your sexism "teen shot after accidentally" the next liberal psy-op (debateart.com) (which is surprising coming from a Roosevelt supporter -- Roosevelt was a big advocate of women's right).

A more interesting question is why are you doing this? Does your wife ignore you at home? Do you like picking on girls? Or are you still stung from me having to hand-hold you through your argument, posting repeatedly as to why your figures didn't match the argument you were trying to make, in order to make it correctly?
#81
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,516
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
They say, ‘Scratch a liberal, you’ll find a fascist’.
But scratch a fascist, you’ll find a communist;
scratch a communist, you’ll find an anarchist;
scratch an anarchist, you’ll find a feudalist;
scratch a feudalist, you’ll find a Roman Republican;
scratch a Roman Republican, you’ll find a democrat,
though he will be incredibly tiny.
LOL, hilarious.
#82
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Do you like picking on girls? 
So even you consider yourself a girl instead of a woman

We can clearly see that you're trying quite hard to provoke me
That’s what happens when you call yourself a White Nationalist.  “We”? Is there more than one of you?

If you can’t take the heat, go back to the kitchen. Lol
#83
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
We can clearly see that you're trying quite hard to provoke me with lies and half-truths. I mean, you're doing this to the point of other people noticing your sexism "teen shot after accidentally" the next liberal psy-op (debateart.com) (which is surprising coming from a Roosevelt supporter -- Roosevelt was a big advocate of women's right).

A more interesting question is why are you doing this? Does your wife ignore you at home? Do you like picking on girls? Or are you still stung from me having to hand-hold you through your argument, posting repeatedly as to why your figures didn't match the argument you were trying to make, in order to make it correctly?
So even you consider yourself a girl instead of a woman
This is yet another instance of you dodging the question and accountability for what you said.
#84
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
If you can’t take the heat, go back to the kitchen. Lol
You don't want me back in the kitchen. You'll end up roasted.
#85
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
Roosevelt was a big advocate of women's right).
Is this another opinion pulled out of your ass? I really don’t recall that being a big part of FDR’s legacy.

#86
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
You don't want me back in the kitchen. 
Or is it you suck at cooking?

#87
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Kaitlyn
provoke me with lies and half-truths.
What lies and half truths exactly?

You call yourself a white nationalist 

Your assessment of Trump’s 2016 win was mischaracterized

You’re one of these Trumpy “the media is the enemy” idiots.

What lies exactly?

#88
TWS1405_2
TWS1405_2's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 2,186
3
3
7
TWS1405_2's avatar
TWS1405_2
3
3
7
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->
@Kaitlyn
You don't want me back in the kitchen. 
Or is it you suck at cooking?

Oh for fucks sake, just knock it off. 

Debate her, stop antagonizing her.

We all know you are incredibly weak at debate and a professional basement troll, but at least she is trying (and succeeds) whereas you fail. 

Either STFU or engage her like an adult. 
#89
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@TWS1405_2
Either STFU or engage her like an adult. 
As I’ve told you many times LCpl, nonsense deserves nothing but derision. Stop saying stupid things and I’ll respond in kind. 

I informed her that Trump won 3 swing states by 80,000 votes to win in 2016. A very small margin for 3 whole state elections 

She responded by saying “the correct context is the winning margin in each individual state”. Obviously 80,000 votes in any 3 swing states is a very very small number but she wasn’t recognizing this.

This makes no sense, unless she is so unfamiliar with the United States she doesn’t realize that millions of votes were cast in these three states that were famously decisive in the 2016 election for Trump.

That’s why her ignorance was deserving of nothing but derision. Although I will cut her some slack now for not being a U.S. citizen/resident 

The United States presidential election is determined by electoral votes, not close states or popular vote.
Donald Trump won 304 electoral votes compared to Hillary Clinton's 227 -- a comfortable victory.
She also kept insisting that it’s the electoral votes that matter as if she didn’t understand that state electoral votes are awarded by winning the popular vote in each state.

#90
Kaitlyn
Kaitlyn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 857
3
3
5
Kaitlyn's avatar
Kaitlyn
3
3
5
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Either STFU or engage her like an adult. 
As I’ve told you many times LCpl, nonsense deserves nothing but derision. Stop saying stupid things and I’ll respond in kind. 

I informed her that Trump won 3 swing states by 80,000 votes to win in 2016. A very small margin for 3 whole state elections 
LOL you still don't get why your statistics here don't support the argument you're making, you big dumb oaf.

80,000 across 3 states doesn't tell us enough. We need to know what states, how close the margins were in those individual states, and thus the percentage won by (which you eventually did anyway, so why did you do that if you didn't think it was necessary?)

For example, if 40,000 of those votes came from Hawaii, it might not have been close at all. Hawaii has about 1.6 million people. If about 1/4 of them vote (since voting isn't compulsory in America), that means about 400,000 voted. 40,000 difference with only 400,000 voters is a *massive* percentage difference. Do you need me to spell that out further for you?

Clearly, it matters which states were the 3 and what the margins were in those states. Why are you unable to understand that? Why did you post the 3 state's split margins anyway, if you thought it wasn't necessary?

The United States presidential election is determined by electoral votes, not close states or popular vote.
Donald Trump won 304 electoral votes compared to Hillary Clinton's 227 -- a comfortable victory.
She also kept insisting that it’s the electoral votes that matter as if she didn’t understand that state electoral votes are awarded by winning the popular vote in each state.
Electoral votes are all that matters ultimately. Even if each electoral vote is won by a singular vote, you've still won that electoral vote. 

Again, I've already acknowledged that the presidential election wasn't as comfortable as the electoral votes make it seem, but your argument of '80,000 therefore close' doesn't explain why it was close, you colossal dummy.