There are, and they will. The current batch of them are not the 1st. They probably wont be the last. Every time some right wing prick with money gets butt hurt they think that they need their own social media site. They all end up the same way. But with enough money behind it they can last a few years.
Sorry, you are not making any sense. First you conceded that there is lots of them, that lots of people value free speech. Now you say that such sites can only last few years at best. I could give you countless examples of sites that have free speech and that have lasted for much more than few years, but given that you reject evidence in favor of making drama, I will just remind you that twitter still has 300 million users.
and pretty much every one of those users signed up while they were still a normal social media site. Now that they are becoming a cesspool, they are bleeding users and especially money
What is this rambling? Twitter is a free speech site. Twitter has 300 million users. Therefore, free speech site has 300 million users.
I also assume the sun will rise tomorrow. It has a similar level of certainty. No law is perfect. There are always flaws, there are always loopholes. People will find them.
Your first assumption is correct because you have an assumption that Sun will rise tommorow?
Also, any law can be improved if too many sites dodge it. Maybe some small, unnoticable site would be able to dodge it, but such site would be reported by citizen report. Therefore, Any site violating the law would be punished. Law would take place. If law takes place, any site violating such law would be punished.
lol are you 12? If I like free speech I have to be ok with nazi's calling for mass murder? What a childish argument.
I believe we already explained that caling for violence isnt free speech.
no, I prefer a functioning society. And all freedoms have limits. Every. single. one. without exception.
Well, then go to North Korea. North Korea has lots of limits on freedom, if limits on freedom is what you prefer. The only limit to freedom of speech should be call to violence.
ok, you must be 12. Because anyone older than that would know that right wing loons calls for violence every couple of seconds
Ah, refutation without refutation. Usually, when you make a counter argument, you should make it about the argument you are trying to refute. I didnt make the argument you are refuting. You are refuting an argument that I didnt make. If I didnt make the argument you are refuting, you are refuting an argument I didnt make. Its complicated, I know. Besides, every site: youtube, quora... is full of calls to violence. However, the leftists call everything they disagree with a call to violence, so I am guessing you get your information from leftist source. However, I urge you not to make such irrelevant arguments anymore.