The supreme court argued a storeowner can refuse to serve someone for being gay.
This to me sounds like a storeowner refusing to serve someone for being unvaccinated.
The right should treat gay people the same way they treat unvaccinated people (and vice versa).
Statement: If you are allowed to deny business to someone for being gay, your ALSO allowed to deny business to someone for being unvaccinated.
I think the converse, inverse, and contrapositive should apply equally.
Liberals think the converse and inverse shouldn't apply because they argue that the unvaccinated are putting other people at risk. To me, this barely makes sense because unvaccinated people are causing almost no vaccinated and boosted people to even get COVID, let alone die from the disease.
You need a little bit of risk to maintain liberty. Those willing to trade liberty for safety deserve neither and would lose both.