Implausible Abortion Arguments

Author: CoolApe
Abortion

Posts

Total: 64
#61
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
-->
@John_C_87
Maybe it has been scrambled so you cannot understand it the queation is, do you need to know?
It's the grammar and syntax. I don't want to be overly critical if there's a language barrier.

We do not have to prove abortion is murder, we proven abortion is an admission to murder,
Please demonstrate/substantiate.

is the admission illegal yes it has been proven by the supreme court.
Please demonstrate/substantiate. (Note: Please demonstrate that the right to an abortion not being recognized as a constitutional right is an admission to murder.)

We prove United State Constitutional Right such as Female-specific amputation. We do not have to ratify the United State Constitutional Right only describe as large a group of females, in the best way as a United State Constitutional Rights so it can be said to be a possible task. 
Can you rephrase this?
#62
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@Athias
It's the grammar and syntax. I don't want to be overly critical if there's a language barrier.
There has to be syntax language barrier there is no United State Constitution Right in relationship to pregnancy abortion. Unlike crime in criminal law a truth, whole truth, nothing but truth, as self-evident truths in right can be written with all nouns or all verbs. It has far less obligations to edicational gammar. 

We do not have to prove abortion is murder, we proven abortion is an admission to murder,
Abort is an officialorder given to stop. We do not official stop pregnancy a woman is medicallyseeking to officially stop birth. A choice has been made to perform an officialstop of birth, not officially stop immigration by birth. By using abortion as acrime in the legislation of criminal law a state of the union has been made to establishjustice. A corruption that will always be as a united state made between allwomen and men and admission to a described abortion. The word Crime is not theword Right, they are in any way the same basic principle.

  Demonstration: Ahired killer appears in a court of law at a trail and is ordered to take thestand. While under oath the person tells the jury and court, he / she has officiallyaborted the existence of 100,000 senior citizens. The killer did not know theage of the victims of his official stop of existence he / she called abortion.There are, however, official medical records of all the bodies which aredestroyed in connection to the official terminations.

Please demonstrate/substantiate. (Note: Please demonstrate that the right to an abortion not being recognized as a constitutional right is an admission to murder.)
No. I will onlydemonstrate that a United States Constitutional Right is constructed betterwithout using a newly Drafted / created crime. Female-specific amputation is awitness account to a Supreme Court’s ruling of unconstitutional. I am taking adocumented crime written by Texas and other State legislation changing thewording and calling it at this time the most perfect United StateConstitutional Right there is in connection to females and basic principles inthe risks of birth, as a united state with all fertile women. Law in this judicialmatter does not need to include those who cannot become impregnated man, men,or women.

Can you rephrase this?
Ratifying a United States Constitutional Right is theprocess in which the documented Right is added to the American Constitution byArticle, Section, clause, and or Amendment. Abortion has only been entered intothe Courts of law as a crime and never a right. So far everyone in the worldhas failed to make this connection to established justice. It is not the onlyglobal democratic failure of this type either.
#63
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
We do not official stop pregnancy a woman is medicallyseeking to officially stop birth.
That isn't necessarily accurate for the following two reasons:

  • Gestation spans over a 36-40 week period. An abortion during any point  during this period would still be described as an end of pregnancy since the woman of subject is still gestating.
  • Some methods of abortions can actually mimic what we know as "birth" especially if the zygote/embryo/fetus is expelled in tact. The only difference is that the zygote/embryo/fetus isn't viable.
A choice has been made to perform an officialstop of birth, not officially stop immigration by birth.
The deciding factor is the viability of the fetus, not its capacity "immigrate" from its mother's womb to space outside its mother's womb.

By using abortion as acrime in the legislation of criminal law a state of the union has been made to establishjustice.
Please substantiate.

A corruption that will always be as a united state made between allwomen and men and admission to a described abortion.
Please substantiate. You cannot replace "abortion" with "murder" and propose that as substantiation without first equating abortion with murder.

Demonstration: Ahired killer appears in a court of law at a trail and is ordered to take thestand. While under oath the person tells the jury and court, he / she has officiallyaborted the existence of 100,000 senior citizens. The killer did not know theage of the victims of his official stop of existence he / she called abortion.There are, however, official medical records of all the bodies which aredestroyed in connection to the official terminations.
Do not merely replace the term "abort" with "murder." Substantiate the equivalence.

I am taking adocumented crime written by Texas and other State legislation changing thewording and calling it at this time the most perfect United StateConstitutional Right there is in connection to females and basic principles inthe risks of birth, as a united state with all fertile women.
Please don't "change the wording." If you wish to propose an appropriate application of Texas state law, or any other state legislation, then by all means do so. It could perhaps be useful to cite the referenced legislation.

Abortion has only been entered intothe Courts of law as a crime and never a right. So far everyone in the worldhas failed to make this connection to established justice. It is not the onlyglobal democratic failure of this type either.
Understood.
#64
John_C_87
John_C_87's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 287
0
2
5
John_C_87's avatar
John_C_87
0
2
5
-->
@Athias
That isn't necessarily accurate for the following two reasons:
Abortion is a United State Constitutional First Amendment Right to admit to murder. Well written in a very elegant way. Both women and men for decades have sought to write a criminal action to say an event is legal. That is clearly not the right way to detail a danger held as united state to all women created by pregnancy and birth. The law sought after is aUnited States Constitutional Right and not a judicial criminal law. Abortion isa criminal law Female-specific amputation is a United States Constitutional Right. A woman defending her body with force which can intentionally end lifeis describing a criminal action dependent on an alibi. A medical event only women can have performed to stop immigration is a United States Constitutional Right.

The actions of the Supreme Court to send abortion down to State criminal legislation is also not establishing a United State Constitutional Right for the risk of pregnancy and birth as a United State of law for all women. They the women as a United State are not looking to write a crime making abortion legal, they are to be seeking to write a United State Constitutional Right about the danger of pregnancy and birth. Then the hard task of having that United States Constitutional Right ratified into an Article of American constitution must take place. The supreme Court ruled abortion was unconstitutional as an invasion of privacy. Then the court was relieved of command of the criminal loss of privacy an the opinion was given that a new United States Constitutional violation was found made against the child who was only in care of an ambassador not assigned by powers of the Executive office.

While with the current administration the argument is to keep government out of women’s basic Right to perform immigration not reproduction. Keep Government out of reproductive rights for women, no how about add to American Constitutional protection to medical privacy already criminal law. As a United States Constitution Right pregnancy,birth, and immigration are not used in relationship to Constitutional made with the wording female-specific amputation directly only criminal law and abortion does this. FSA is connected to Constitutional ensures, established justice, and other qualities of American Constitutional Preamble. Which is the goal in the creation of Constitutional rights it would also be a state of the union address to Congress made by a President of the United States of America.