Total votes: 9
AR provided valid reasons and used Christianity to his advantage. As a Christian myself, I must admit my heart was shifted towards AR. But after reading the arguments it went from 10% to 100%.
Why?
WE must all agree that we were assigned different genders at the start of birth. The lord, or any god you believe, created us in our own unique ways. But some people think of this meaning differently. Unique means to be having different appearances for each person. Whether ugly or handsome, not two people are the same. Unique also means personality.
Because of this, being born feeling different occurs to everybody, we must all remember that this is part of growing up, not some special “spidey sense”.
Con uses the facts of original humans efficiently, he provided both the human and the Christian’s perspective of this topic.
Since both users forfeited one of their rounds, it would be viewed as a 2 round argument.
The whole entire debate kind of got sidetracked, but there was one thing that helped con win and that was source,
Since he added a source during his argument, he is right to receive one point.
One point added to pro since he put in statistics and some chracteristics of debating, otherwise he gets no other points since he kept refusing
OMG THAT WAS ONE PF THE MOST GREATEST DEBATE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE A ABSOLUTE GREAT EFFORT TO BOTH PRO AND CON
Bruh why do you even do the debate if you know you’re gonna forefiet anyway.
Stop wasting con’s time.
This quote from con singly handedly won my vote:
When the powerful defend against the weak, they become even weaker.
This makes a lot of sense and explains today’s society. And is a powerful touch of reality we must all accept.
Both provided very good and well structured arguments, however con provided trusted and reliable sources while pro didn’t provide any sources at all.
However, con also forefit one round without a valid reason so for that one point goes to pro.
Ai taking over our jobs is more sided with the illogical side than the logical.
While pro may have some point in his argument, con uses it as a counter and therefore provides better and more detailed reasons.
While pro had the stronger arguments, cons statement of chatbots did make sense.
However birth sides shifted to a different topic so I did a tie