AdaptableRatman

👏 brilliantly put

You brought adult topics into a mafia game where 13 yos can play and under 13s can access.

I dont think staying on topic is top of your agenda.

I have no idea where we got off topic. Democracy leads to the ability of those entering a nation to end up totally altering its laws. That is an actual flaw of it for those already there.

There is a different definition of Pantheism:

https://update.gci.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/panentheism.jpg

Maybe Buddhism is Pantheistic and not Panentheistic actually

Agent Smith is one of the best portrayed examples of an antivillains of all time imho.

Thank you. Good vote.

One thing, Pantheism is this modern concept of many religions being true at the same time.

Panentheism is specific to religions that say we are within or from god-essence itself and all are god in a way therefore.

He is alive today and is all knowing lol

Peter says similar elsewhere, stronger even.

I just like the Ephesians wording slightly more for this debate's context.

He did but it likely was less well shaped/formed.

Pls vote ty.

Do yourself a favour and stop culturally/religiously appropriating Catholics with that pfp when debating this.

Is Fauxlaw's sources point justified?

🫡🙏💪

See my report below pls

I report fauxlaw for the sources poonts not beig justified.

i repirt vi_777 for barely exploring the debate and not at all mentioning my side.

Last round blitzkrieg is filthy as it gets. 1 day rounds sealed the deal fir Pro.

Here is an example of Krishna acting more like Shiva:

(Maybe NSFW)

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-82497792edb43a6dbf5b986737502006-lq

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/de/ea/b1/deeab1903c22e69c54f9f754c31dab96.jpg

This is a 'fully Vishnu' example of Krishna.

It is disputed between the Shiva focused sects and Vishnu focused sects, which one Krishna is actually 'is'.

Shiva worsippers see Krishna as above both and therefore Shiva enda up being Krishna backwards.

Google will tell you Krishna is definitely Vishnu because Vedas favour Vishnu-supremacy and Shiva worshippers adhere to othr takes on the entire hierarchy and hold Shiva equal or superior to Vishnu and Brahma. They also see Krishna as a hybrid above even Vishnu.

There are stories of him that fit Vishnu better (peaceful flute player taming animals) and ones that fit Shiva better (he tamed a snake but ended up fighting it slaying it getting bitten suring the fight hence why he is blue when plder but very pale prior, even peach skin in some depictions as a boy).

The boy Kannan interpretation of flute playing pacifist Krishna is the Vishnu one, the warrior guy who happened to also tame animals well is the Shiva onee
.

Ty for voting but it may get reported.

Ty for modding too.

You lied saying I gave no proofs, I did. Several.

Tigerlords vote is reported.

What is your opinion on Islam?

if I vote against you is it fine?

I am asking before I reread this fully.

Based on a fast skimreading, I am not sure whether you won or he did. The semantics of what Judaism is, seems a huge part of the debate

You literally call yourself a slave of Allah and then call Yhwh a tyrant. Do you not see an irony there?

I didn't lie. I know Islamic history.

I didnt even mention the fact you guys ban depicting all faces and animals. You basically make appreciating the beauty of all God made into a sin. We see Jesus regularly in our depictions amd worship him. You watch non Muslim made movies. How can you watch animated movies, those depict living beings... your profile pic is a sin to even exist in Islam thats why all pictures of Muhammad are banned. That iss why they cover women faces up not just hair. Hair is fine, face is beyond it.

I already ignored it and voted eslewhere. I will get to this debate later ty.

Us, muis is a phone typo.

Should be an easy vote especially due to Round 3.

All 7 to winner please as per description, thank you in advance.

Please may I vote on this debate in an objective manner as I have voted thus far?

I have to correct some spelling errors and had more to say, so no I wont. I may sacrifice a later Round. Not Round 2 here.

He did it 4 times here and done bad votes elsewhere.

If you want my advise, just take his voting privs. 3 week ban from voting.

It definitely is designed to keep muis controlled, I see that as not meaning it is not true if you mean the Christian faith, especially Catholic.

Combine that with the description.

Does Rule 6 become an issue?

For The Ontological Argument to be sound, the following must be assumed:

1. It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
2. If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world.
3. If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
4. If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
5. If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.

See the issue?

Resolution/Topic: The modal ontological argument is sound

Rule 6: No "kritiks" of the topic (challenging assumptions in the resolution)

But it is in the debate description

I recommend you to establish with Pro what counts as a Rule 6 violation before either posts a Round 1. That way if you disagree, it saves Pro wasting effort and this is unrated anyway so Pro is not feasibly robbed of a free win that would count towards Rating.

Con has to Kritik to win btw. Rule 6 is unfair.

Enjoy your travelling I will pray you get relieved of stress.

I did not repost my rfd to antagonise you. That is my genuine rfd in my own words. Any alteration will be a lie.

I demand Barney or David handle it if it gets reported please. I directly appeal your modding.

Is rizzler's current vote allowed? If yes, I wish to vote a similar way.

What about us holding a debater to sportsmanlike behaviour?

A user I cannot name cried to mods to ban me voting on his/her debates. Sorry, and no I am not joking.

That user is about to get banned for a loooong time though. Just waiting on whiteflame.

🤦‍♂️💀🧠

🙏🤍✝️

Are you EO, OO or Catholic?

Calvinists may as well be Muslims. I will prove how it does not work for Christianity.

I will back Thomism.

Yoy can ask users barney or whiteflame to delete it

FF applies if someone argues 1 round and forfeits after.

He did identical backwards and left opponent 0 chance to rebuke. Your rules are wrong, not my vote at all.

In a real debate tournament Con would be DQd long term

"Pro began with a Label that has multiple rap artists signed to it."

Meant Con.