God exists

Foregone conclusion.

Both pro and con are out of topic, poor argument, legibility and sources, i consider it as tie.

Pro’s R1 offers two arguments to support the Resolution: creation, morals
Con’s R1 suggests a singularity is responsible for creation but the that loops of properties that allow contradictions, as if God’s creation is supposed to be perfect. Con does not offer that argument of creation’s necessity to be perfect, but is suggested as why there are contradictions.

Pro’s R2 argues that God allows evil to exist. He did not create it, but allows it, and tells us how to make it good, and he offers several reasons, primarily because of our free will to choose between evil and good actions.
Con”s R2 is a pointless, argument-free, expletive orgy that, on it’s own, a loss of conduct point, if there was one.

Both Pro and Con lose R3, but Pro’s previous 2 rounds are sufficient for the win. Yes, Pro, you win, but your R3 does not exist to claim it unless your opponent was a full forfeit, while you had legit rounds of argument. He was neither a forfeit nor a lack of argument.

Mods, handle this.

The debate is a FF as all Rounds after the opening had no argumentation from one side.

Give me mod powers. I will show you how to run the show. The reign of the Ratman shall come.