Total posts: 396
-->
@RationalMadman
time watching a far right nutjob documentary.
You're going to have to substantiate that if you want anyone to take you seriously.
Otherwise, all this amounts to is "I know you are, but what am I" tactics. Or more aptly, "I am right, you are wrong. Deal with it."
That is not how you conduct a proper learning moment via debate/discussion where cited evidence is given. Failure to look at it, for any reason, making faux claims like you just did, is the tell-tale sign of ignorance on laziness steroids.
Tell us what you want children taught instead,
The same proven classic liberal arts (math, science, English linguistics, etc.) taught for hundreds of years that has proven 100% effective in fostering furthered education at higher institutions of learning.
to understand social equality of races and LGBTQ, how would you handle teaching them that in a better way?
No. Those topics should be strictly optional electives in college, not required. People will eventually learn about those things one way or the other once they get into the real world.
-->@<<<Amber>>>I am with you 100% on loathing the trans agenda on children's and teens.Fucking vile to encourage them to stop puberty and consent to permanent mutilation of their genitalia.
Well, at least we can mutually agree on that reality.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Not very good at grammar, are you?
I did not tell you what to do.
It was an indirect suggestion.
You need to learn to read better.
Created:
If you are NOT interested in the discussion and the core substance of it provided within the documentary, then just don't comment.
You disrespect me, as the OP, and anyone else who does watch it and are genuinely interested in the discussion at hand.
Stop wasting my time, and everyone else' time with your banter (spamming).
Thank you,
Amber
Created:
-->
@Critical-Tim
What is the typical accuracy of someone's personal outlook on life?
Desire for accomplishment in order to give meaning their life. That desire is entirely dependent on their upbringing and education. It determines, their personified experience, what their interests and goals of success are in life.
In general, do people overestimate their troubles and more often focus on the negative, do they accurately estimate their satisfaction with their life ahead, or do they underestimate their troubles and focus on the positive?
Yes, that is a given. Especially for those with weak constitutions and low self-esteem with little to no support structure.
They may or may not estimate their satisfaction in life ahead, depending on the results achieved thus far.
Do people commonly live with a ball of emotional dissatisfaction that they ignore so they can be happier, or is it more common that people live comfortably in the moment?
Depending on the upbringing and education will dictate the answer to this question.
Are the differences in these perspectives largely dependent on a person's philosophy and the culture of their childhood?
Culture plays a big part, for sure.
Created:
I sure wish people would show genuine interest in the OP and watch the documentary before commenting. Otherwise, it is just mindless subjective banter that I am just not interested in.
Created:
Wylted
I saw this: You are probably not LGQBTP+ (debateart.com) just now. You posted it 3 days ago?
Having read it, I thought you would be interested in the documentary because it speaks to what you wrote about, starting with children and young adults.
Amber
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
See what I mean Amber?
Yes, you didn't watch the documentary.
Created:
This documentary video, done by a producer who has worked with some pretty famous people, has shown how and why this world is turning to shit.
It is the only place I could find to the full video, and yes, it is on X, but that makes no difference.
The documentary is professionally researched and put together.
Through psychological warfare, or as they call it, the mere-exposure effect western civilization is being destroyed from within.
There is a war on Western Civilization, and so far the enemy is winning. America has never been so divided across so many lines.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
-->@<<<Amber>>>Because I have been on enough so-called debate forums to know there will ALWAYS be an immature troll, an ignorant liberal, and a dolt who just follows the most popular clown in the group.Here, in that order of your list, is IWRA, DoubleR, and finishing the trio is FLRW. A veritable Moe, Larry, and Curly.I actually like them around because they are not shy to play their roles. There's no confusion as to what the agenda is.
I see your point as a measure of entertainment, but I have no patience or inclination for that kind of banality. Such behavior is beyond childish for grown ass adults. I want to have discourse. I want to share ideas, thoughts and learn. I do not want to have to deal with children. I already have two. I do not need anymore childish behaviors from adults. I hope Wylted can take this site over, or create something better. I would be willing to move there.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I know that. It is just a part of my good manners.Oh ya, I can see your mother raised a real lady. If you really are female, since You said you lied on your profile. Why didn’t you say you are a man so people would take you more seriously?
You misogynist little (BLEEP)
Your name calling deflection methods are pathetic. A direct reflection of you.
No need to engage with you anymore. None of your arguments hold water and all you retort with is 5yo banter.
Bugger off and go play in traffic. I'm done with you.
Amber
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>I never tell the truth on my profileBecause you’re ashamed of who you are?
No. Because I have been on enough so-called debate forums to know there will ALWAYS be an immature troll, an ignorant liberal, and a dolt who just follows the most popular clown in the group. Among the three, it prescribes telling lies about oneself because it is a guaranteed fact you basement dwellers will look at one's profile and try to expose them or use their details against them as if it is a negative piece of evidence discrediting their views. Anyone who tells the truth on their profile is asking for trouble.
And for you to question what info I do or do not post on my profile that is or is not true is laughable at best when you do not provide any truthful details yourself. Makes you a, well, hmm...hypocrite!
->@<<<Amber>>>Thanks for proving me true/right in that regard. LOL!!!AmberYou don’t need to sign your posts dinghy, everyone can see who is posting
I know that. It is just a part of my good manners. I like to sign my posts. Trying to turn that against me speaks a lot about you.
-->@<<<Amber>>>Any child can claim it is a lieBut you responded with the word “lie” about Trump’s perfect phone call. So you are a child? At least emotionally?
Childish deflection on your part. You are one who uses the term lie, liar, et al across the entirety of this website. Yes, I have scanned various forums of subjects I might like to engage in and seen your retorts to others you cannot disprove. You just accuse them of being liars and the details they post as lies without EVER backing them up. And yet you feel inclined to call me a child for using the term "lie" (out of context reference on your part), while you use the term endlessly yourself. How rich.
->@<<<Amber>>>provide a cogent, well thought out and supported response against another's offered argument on the subject at hand.You have not demonstrated the ability to do this since joining the site toots.You have demonstrated you are a hysterical, wack job, MAGA MORON who cites wack job think tank websites like the American Action News! lol
I've already slapped you silly and wiped the floor in this threaded topic. NONE of your arguments held water. None. You possess a leaky bucket. And you're too childish to actually defend your spoon-fed leftist arguments.
You have a lot of nerve to question sources when you use WAPO and Vox. LOL!!!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Afraid of strong woman are ya little man?Is that what you consider yourself?
huh?
LOL!!!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Rehashing a debunked argument, are ya? Want another lashing I see. You like BDSM, clearly.Is this an example of how to defend an argument?
Says the douche who replies with one personal insult and attack after another because he is too impotent to actually use the cells between his ears and provide a cogent, well thought out and supported response against another's offered argument on the subject at hand.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
->@<<<Amber>>>See. You are impotent where it comes to defending your position(s).But you’re not defending your positions dinghy. You’re just replying lies! And fallacy!
Any child can claim it is a lie. Takes an adult to prove it. We all know you are not the latter.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>Never declared my religious affiliations or thoughts/beliefs.Ok, you declared yourself as a Pagan on your DART biography dinghy
You believing what I indicated on my profile is absolutely HILARIOUS!!!
I never tell the truth on my profile because I KNOW childish trolls like you would make some snide sexist misogynistic comment about it.
Thanks for proving me true/right in that regard. LOL!!!
Amber
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>Deflection with a red herring fallacy. Typical. Impotence.Um, are you drunk again? I know it is Saturday night. Are you at a bar trying to hook up again?
See. You are impotent where it comes to defending your position(s).
Personal attacks =/= evidence against the argument of another.
Personal attacks = childish behavior or trolling
Why the moderators or powers that be tolerate you disrupting valid discussions is beyond dumbfounding.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
LiesHe was impeached for his perfect phone call toots
Rehashing a debunked argument, are ya? Want another lashing I see. You like BDSM, clearly. Sicko.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>Galatians 6: 7-8I thought you were a Pagan.
Never declared my religious affiliations or thoughts/beliefs.
You're clearly thinking of someone else not I, and in that case, wow...you have issues.
Afraid of strong women are ya little man?
LOL!
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Your argument holds no waterAnd this is your idea of civil discussion, integrity, and decency?
Proving you wrong is civil, full of integrity and is the defintion of decency.
You posted an article from The Atlantic and declared “fact” 70% of black women get pregnant out of wedlock. That was not true.
Deflection with a red herring fallacy. Typical. Impotence.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
->@<<<Amber>>>Using actual logical 'fallacies' in rebuttal to impotent erectile dysfunctional menIs this you being civil toots?
You Reap what you Sow
Galatians 6: 7-8
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.What he means by that is I will make fun of you if you haven’t done anything with your life…if you’re a social outcast…you know, a loser.Trump likes to call people losers so I’m sure you’re fine with that, right?
Yeah, because you have no life and enjoy personally attacking anyone you disagree with by using very immature juvenile responses with garbage jargon showing/proving to everyone at this site what a toxic person you are.
Based on what I have seen of you so far at this site, this is how I see you in real life:
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>pure deflection with a red herring fallacy.I noticed MAGA MORONS love to use the term fallacy. There’s nothing red herring about the 2 billion Kushner got from the Saudis.
To which of the many ignorant retorts that you provided with a red herring fallacy are you specifically retorting to here?
Don't be unclear about it, be clear about it.
Using actual logical 'fallacies' in rebuttal to impotent erectile dysfunctional men is neither MAGA or MORON.
But please, keep proving how limp you are with your arguments that hold no water, dear. It truly is humorous.
You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.That’s bullshit. But watch out for GP. He’s a very, very lonely guy.
That was not my statement; but then again, I wouldn't expect you to be consistent or clear in anything.
Do not know of any "GP"?
If you are referring to GreyParrot, again, do not know him personally or otherwise.
Your assessment of him holds no water. As does anything else you drivel onto these pages.
Deflection with more condescension. Proves your argument holds no water.Well you deserve condescension because you’re a dummy, My argument that Trump cheats on everything including his wives is not disputed, but it is ignored by the MAGA MORONS
Do you even read (or hear in your head) the tripe you post?
"Well (sic) you deserve condescension because you're a dummy."
LOL! Your demeanor via your choice of words speak for themselves.
And I already proved you wrong the cheating wives thing. Many politicians have. Selective whining/crying/b*tching about who cheats on who is asinine. If it doesn't interfere with their ability to effectuate the job, I could care less if he has 15 hookers on retainer. We need a leader. Not your senile ice cream licking, child groping, hair sniffing, pedo dementia lunatic sleeping in the oval office because he missed nappy time.
Aww, GP has found a soulmate. 2 MAGA MORONS sittin in a tree…but GP would never be k-I-s-s-I-n-g
See, you keep proving what a manchild you are. Pure pre-teen behavior when you cannot defend your position with actual intelligence.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
@IwantRooseveltagain
The irony of the blatant hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Dems whine about the GOP giving tax breaks to the rich, and yet they are benefiting from it.
The Dems, historically, have been so corrupt it is beyond belief.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
-->@<<<Amber>>>He also likes to doxx people, so do not tell him what you actually do or where you live.
When people try to do such insidious things, they prove/demonstrate that they are ill-equipped to have civil discourse/discussions/debates and defend their own position. And when proven wrong with no measure of intelligence to defend their position, or integrity to admit they are wrong, they resort to such devious tactics. Little man children they are. Childish behavior being caught with their hand in the cookie jar of stupid arguments that they cannot defend. Lashing out against those who proved them wrong, again, childish.
It's because of people like him that makes sites like this toxic.
I know I am new here, but (wo)man, I am inclined to leave if there is no one with a modicum of decency and integrity to have a civil discussion on any topic, regardless of how controversial it may, or may not be.
Amber
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>Thanks for proving all your arguments hold NO water.You are going to discover this guy only uses WAPO and Vox for all sources cited.
No surprise. Two of the worst sources to fall back on.
Clearly, he is still has no water since he hasn't replied any further, knowing full well that his bucket is full of holes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
The older black and Hispanic women get (20y+), the higher the birth rate for unwed women,
Two highest groups.
Try again dehydrated horse!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Well said and understood.
It will be a challenge I am sure, as I have no technical skills for hosting let alone even using apps/sites that even help you create your own site. I leave that to those who enjoy and are skilled at such things. I merely enjoy using opportunities provided to expand my knowledge and interpersonal communiation skills online.
Amber
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
-->@TheweakeredgeEasy to use site with a good mix of users.
Until, as I have review the DebateArt.com and Moderator logs...........far too many are deleted. Why?
Unpopular opinions?
Better arguments kicking the shit out of popular users of the site?
I mean really, just how "free speech" vs "anti-trolling" is this place?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Ya, that’s coming from a guy who lives all alone, has never kissed a girl and makes $100 a day as a substitute teacher.And I’m not surprised you are drinking alone in a bar. You seem like a typical low life character to me. The kind that has had a few abortions herself.
I do not even know where to begin with this utter nonsense.
Is that projection on our part?
I am not a teacher, so I do not even know who the hell you are even talking about here.
Clearly you are so fucking flustered that you are spamming members of the forum with BS.
I never drink alone, honey.
And I am clearly far higher about you, Mr. "low life character."
Created:
Posted in:
If you are reading this it is entirely possible that you are not a queer.
I am reading this, and I am sure as (BLEEP) not queer.
Well, I mean I appreciate the beauty of the human form...male and female, but I will never cross that line.
The LGBT movement has tried to make the definition cover just about everything so as to make you personally identify with he movement so as to trick you into defending several forms of degeneracy.
Tried, how? Deflection doesn't change definitions.
Women who identify as men or gender queer
They're just gay. No different than men identifying as women and men liking transwomen. Both...GAY!
If you are a female and you like a lot of masculine things, you like to hang out with the boys and watch football, but you are romantically interested in men, Tham the LGBTQP movement has most likely lied to you and told you that you in fact were gender non conforming or that you are a woman in a male's body but a homosexual male.
That makes no sense, which is why the batsh*t crazy alphabet soup mafia can never make any legit sense. They deny and ostracize actual science.
I personally have been with so many women that it is disgusting and I probably have a disease...
Man whore! ;-) lol
If you do have a disease, yucky!!!
If you think you are a lesbian, you are a woman with low self confidence. You either think you are too ugly to get a man because you are, so you pretend to be a lesbian because many women are more open to sex with ugly people, though you yourself aren't open to sex with an ugly man.
Cannot argue with most of that. I've seen some pretty butt f*ugly women who want to be lesbians, and most are overweight and, well, butch, but wow. Then I have met many sexy attractive women who are lesbian, mostly bi, that do it because they can be due to the fact they know they are sexy and hot. They're playing a game that will sooner or later get them into deep shit.
The second option is you have low self esteem but it's because people are dicks not because you are ugly.
No, it is because they are ugly.
Watch this. It is nasty.
Not sure where you are going with the rest of it, but, yeah.
The whole trans ideology is a farce meant to screw young kinds minds up, and even insecure adults. That I can agree with.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
-->@<<<Amber>>>I'm just saying... Roosevelt makes the village idiot seem like a genius by comparison.
ROTFLMAO!!!
I damn near fell out of my bar stool reading this one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
-->@<<<Amber>>>The village idiot speaks...Please do not insult village idiots again. That's just beyond the pale.
They do exist though, ya know.
But okay. Fine. I will refrain from observing and stating same.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Black girls/women have a 72% + out of wedlock birthrate.
Fact
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Wylted: Wapo is now asking for my email address to read articles. You are going to have to start giving some context or copy pasting the article so I can read them.
Ditto!
Your WAPO Fish Wrapper links are meaningless unless you cut n paste the article for all of us to read. We are not paying to see your trash.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@WyItedNot a single liberal will apologize for calling trump a liar when he said his campaign was spied om.His campaign was not spied on you idiot
The village idiot speaks.
You clearly didn't watch the video, and purposely deny all evidence that contradicts your delusional world view.
Amber
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Now, I think your link contains bunch of lies,
I don't care what you think.
Your denialism is your problem, and it is clear you have no interest in civil discourse.
Good bye.
Amber
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>Cheats on his wives? So what! No human being is perfect. JFK cheated. RFK cheated. MLK Jr cheated. Clinton cheated.So the Republican Party is no longer the party of family values and Christian religion?
Deflection with more condescension. Proves your argument holds no water.
Trump did not personally pay anyone hush money. His lawyer paid her with his money. That case with her went away. Digging it up with some legal fandangling is political grandstanding and election interference.Yes he did genius. Having his lawyer pay and then paying his lawyer back (the checks have been made public by his lawyer) is no difference.The trial is set for March 25 genius. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
When your lawyer sends you a bill, you pay it.
When your electric company sends you a bill, you pay it.
When your doctor sends you a bill, you pay it.
Paying a bill is not an admission of guilt of anything, non-genius!
Her attorney is in jail. She paid him $120,000 in legal fees for a failed defamation case.
Hannity and Trump's attorney exposes the election interference of this case: https://youtu.be/r-4u9Yqny7c?si=TMbo5HGjnmOriYE_
No, you do not know what you are talking about.
Your argument still holds NO water.
Lies? Well JFC! The sky is falling!! Oh, wait!!! Every single person alive on the planet lies. YOU LIE! We all lie. That is not a job disqualification for POTUS let alone Congress.So lying is perfectly fine in the Republican Party. Ok. Is there a difference to you if someone lies once or twice in 4 years or lies 30,000 times? Is it the same in your little pea brain?YOUR BRAIN HOLDS NO FACTS
More deflection. More condescending and pretentious demeanor cause you clearly are too illiterate and ignorant to make an actual argument supported by fact based evidence. So you do what you so often accuse others of doing: lying.
Your arguments have been conclusively proven baseless, an empty water bucket.
You're dismissed.
Amber
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
->@<<<Amber>>>Making a phone call?You forgot to say perfect phone call. But Trump had called to bribe or extort Zelensky for help for his political campaign
Lies.
Making a phone call is not "high crimes or misdemeanors."Abuse of power and extortion definitely are
Lies.
Impeachment for what? The fallacious claim of inciting an insurrection? He was acquitted of that.And OJ was acquitted of murdering his ex-wife. So he’s innocent right? And that impeachment “jury” of Republican, totally credible, right?The Senate majority leader, MCCONNELL said Trump should be prosecuted but he voted to acquit Trump on the technicality that he was no longer President.
Deflection with a red herring fallacy.
I do not care what he did where the draft is concerned. Children of wealthy and influential people often didn't have to comply with the draft. Your argument holds no water.Is that because you’re a woman and nobody expects a woman to serve in the military. They are to weak..
Sexist much? More deflection. Your arguments still hold no water. You're all deflection and no substance.
Cheating on his taxes? Please. His CPAs are filing his taxes and using what the government gave them (loop holes) to utilize. That's not cheating.His company was found guilty of breaking the law on taxes. Apparently he went beyond the loopholes. His own sister and niece said so.The Trump family has a long history of tax evasion and deceptive business practices
Vox? LOL! Doesn't surprise me you would pick that grossly leftist biased and uncredible source to argue with.
Thanks for proving all your arguments hold NO water.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>repetitive pay for play (Ukraine & China), treasonous behavior/policies regarding the border resulting in a Bonafide invasion, influence pedaling,1)Are you talking about the millions Jared Kushner got from Saudi Arabia to hook them up with Trump?2) An invasion? How many tanks and artillery pieces did they use to invade?3) What did Biden do for money? Who paid him?
1) pure deflection with a red herring fallacy. See. Your argument holds no water.
2) more defection with a patronizing smart ass retort. See. Your argument holds no water.
3) his financial crimes are common knowledge, they're even on the government website. You refuse to acknowledge it. See. Your argument holds no water.
Obama: racial division, Solyndra (money laundering), Obamacare, Political profiling by the IRS, DAVA and PACA, etc.1) Racial division? Was Obama born in this country?2) Because Trump told us he didn’t believe he was? He said he found amazing things in Hawaii, but then …nothing.3) Solyndra money laundering? Please explain because I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.4)The IRS was led by a guy chosen by Bush. They were investigating TEA BAGGERS abusing the IRS code, posing as “Social welfare” groups when they were actually engaged in political fundraising.
1) pure deflection with a red herring fallacy. See. Your argument holds no water.
2) ignoratio elenchi retort. See, your argument holds NO water.
3) THE BLISS INDEX: A not-so-sunny outlook ahead...; Big money still flowed to politically connected donors while Solyndra sunk (yahoo.com); What’s exactly happened with the government’s Solyndra loan? (yahoo.com)
4) Lies. IRS targeting controversy - Wikipedia Do you research before opening your mouth.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
What was provided was EVIDENCERandom links arent evidence.You gotta say what the link states.No one is gonna open your links if you wont bother to explain what they say.I didnt even look at your links and I wont even open them, and I doubt anyone else will either.
They were NOT "random links." Those were very specific subjects that go to the very heart of the question.
Your refusal to open and read them is your personal problem, not mine.
And I do not have to repeat what the article says, you can read if for yourself. I mean, it is rather apparent you are lazy and cannot handle reading the truth, but come on.
If you won't accept the truth that's on you.
You lose the debate.
Bye.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
-->@<<<Amber>>>So many, black and white, have been corrupted absolutely by the "power" trip. Biden being #1. Obama #2. Clinton #3. Bush #4. So on and so forth.Oh really. What “corruption” do you see from Biden and Obama?
The Republican party stands for truth, honor and justice in the American way.The leader of the Republican Party was impeached twice, dodged the draft for Vietnam, cheats on his taxes, cheats on his wives, sleeps with porn stars, pays them hush money, lies habitually, panders to racists and sexists, rapes women, denigrates women, and enriched himself while in office. He’s responsible for ending the country’s record of a peaceful transition of power by telling his MAGA MORONS a Big Lie.
Impeachment for what? Making a phone call? Please. He was vindicated on that matter because we all know the influence pedaling Biden did in Ukraine that it is on audio and video recordings. That impeachment was nothing more than political grandstanding. Making a phone call is not "high crimes or misdemeanors."
Impeachment for what? The fallacious claim of inciting an insurrection? He was acquitted of that.
Your argument about impeachment holds no water.
I do not care what he did where the draft is concerned. Children of wealthy and influential people often didn't have to comply with the draft. Your argument holds no water.
Cheating on his taxes? Please. His CPAs are filing his taxes and using what the government gave them (loop holes) to utilize. That's not cheating. Another argument that doesn't hold water.
Cheats on his wives? So what! No human being is perfect. JFK cheated. RFK cheated. MLK Jr cheated. Clinton cheated. The list is long but distinguished. Another whiny argument that holds no water.
Trump did not personally pay anyone hush money. His lawyer paid her with his money. That case with her went away. Digging it up with some legal fandangling is political grandstanding and election interference. Your argument holds no water.
Lies? Well JFC! The sky is falling!! Oh, wait!!! Every single person alive on the planet lies. YOU LIE! We all lie. That is not a job disqualification for POTUS let alone Congress. Your argument holds no water.
Panders to who? Racists? Sexists? Define those terms and then list a dozen for example to give some measure of credence to this claim of yours. Otherwise, who cares. Lobbyists pander to all aspects of life across constituents to corporations to the relative committees to get the agenda pushed. You clearly know nothing about political science and how those within politics pander 24/7/365. Again, your argument holds no water.
Who did Trump rape? What city/state was he criminally charged and convicted in? And do not come back with E. Jean Carroll. She is a fraud planted to disrupt Trump's campaign and finances. A civil trial doesn't prove rape. NY changed the laws just so she could file suit. Again, political grandstanding. And you could charge civilly in NY for easting a ham sandwich in a Mosque and be found guilty even though he has never stepped foot in a Mosque. Again, your argument holds no water.
Denigrates women? He denigrates anyone he looks down upon. Men. Women. Makes no difference. Again, not a disqualification for office. Your argument doesn't hold water.
Enriched himself? He didn't take a single paycheck while holding the Office of the Presidency. His kids were running the Trump businesses. He stepped away from them. Your argument holds no water.
And J6 was a riot. Trump language no differently than a vast number of politicians use and proven with video evidence during trial by his lawyer regarding J6. Hyperbole are not literal commands. Maxine Waters used far more inflammatory and inciteful language during the Floyd trial than what Trump said about protesting peacefully, encouraging Americans to exercise their 1A rights. Once again, your argument holds no water.
You're clearly dehydrated by now since you have no water to drink being so wrong on every single illiterate argument you put forth.
Trump declassified his presidential recordsNo he did not. You’re delusional
Yes, he did. Prove me wrong. Do not just claim it followed by a personal insult. Prove it. Otherwise, the delusion falls on you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
-->@<<<Amber>>>Throwing around insults in question form?And the person you are trying to insult is one of the top debaters.And you didnt even present an argument, but a link.Do you know that links arent arguments?
There was no accusation. It was an observation. To understand Ben's position and how he presented it, it begged the question.
I could care less how many debates the person has been involved in. That doesn't mean anything. Those participations can easily be inflated. And they still do not establish credibility or evidence for a proferred position.
No, I did not present an argument. How very astute of you.
What was provided was EVIDENCE to counter the unsubstantiated subjective opinion about Musk put forth.
And do you know that there needs to be a ' in did not (didn't) and a ' in are not (aren't)?
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@Benjamin
I think the current Republican party lacks any real solutions to any problem, they are half ideology and half lies. You must be politically illiterate or filthy rich to support them.
You clearly know NOTHING about political science.
Politics is cumbersome and convoluted. Bills get passed with votes, votes that are bought and paid for via lobbyists.
Politicians are greedy and love the power. Look at this piece of shit, for example: Embattled mayor of Illinois town slammed over $300K salary posts video of herself with Biden at White House and vows to 'stay positive' after telling colleagues they should be 'ashamed for attacking a black woman in power' | Daily Mail Online
So many, black and white, have been corrupted absolutely by the "power" trip. Biden being #1. Obama #2. Clinton #3. Bush #4. So on and so forth.
The Republican party stands for truth, honor and justice in the American way. Problem is, the Democrats have their T-Rex nails into everything, and it makes it very fucking difficult to get things passed let alone changed in the swamp. Which is precisely why Donald J. Trump was elected. He wasn't a career politicians. The swamp feared him. Trump knows what he wasn't supposed to know, and what they didn't want him to know. And they were especially scared of Jeffrey E. Trump has knowledge of all that, and more.
Everything the DC swamp is scared of, and I mean for REALS this time, scares the living hell out of the left and Democrats. Which is precisely why they are doing anything and everything to get rid of him outside of clear-cut assassination. Trying to make him "scum" is only making people like him more, and not because of the scum claims but because everyone knows it's all pure bullshit. Everything they are throwing at him has been proven to have been committed by democrats currently in office.
Trump and presidential records, Biden did the same, but he was never President. There is a huge diff. between the two difference cases. Biden knew he had the documents because he wantonly kept them for more than 40 years, and he was NEVER POTUS!! Trump declassified his presidential records and within a few months they are charging him. DOJ told him where to keep them and to do so under lock and key. Biden had them scattered across the Eastern seaboard. No security. You have to be really ignorant or willfully ignorant to deny these facts.
Ideology? Please. The left and Democrats are the ideologs. Defund the police. Pander to mental illness. So on and so forth.
I mean really, what fucking planet are you living on!!!!!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Benjamin
Are you being obtuse on purpose, or are you really that dense?????
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Washington Post?
HA HA HA!!!
Created: