Average_Person

i can judge

xd exactly what I was thinking too

and thats how he beacme popular u mf

FDR shared his father's bond with the democratic party you mf

A friend introduced me to DART, yes.

Ur answering the question by saying the question has an answer. This ain’t a debate where you can throw a fallacy.

What would be the goal of this? If ppl are acting up, wouldn't it obvious ?

Lmao

Also kinda obvious 

who tf said I was 

It’s just a half hour whenever man. A new debate opening up is once in a blue moon it closes in like .5 hr 

how dead is dead?

Thanks, I didn't make it; AI did.

Idk, but it feels like it is.

- New debates once in a blue moon

- A lot of em have 0 votes, making it a tie when it seemed like one side could have won

- Forum dead as is

- Mafia is dead x2

- Many users leaving the site

idk man.

so you ask for a wish, then someone replies asking for another wish and adding a constraint to yours?

ah kk thx for clarification

There's like 1 debate per like 3 days or smth. dead site ??!?!?!?!?!

i mean debates are basically dead in that regard tooo

ok lol

just some examples

also https://www.debateart.com/debates/2444-unrap-battle

and https://www.debateart.com/debates/2474-my-name-is-with-100-certainty-tyrone-higgins

What about some topics that go unorthodox in terms of an actual debate topic?

So I guess AI isn't even at the level where chess can be fully planned out

Poker's technically just a game of probability: probability of winning based on your hand and the cards on the table.

You can approximate a probability of winning much easier than chess. I believe stockfish only has depth 18 (only can see 18 moves into the future)/

I believe the fertility rate is also decreasing a lot so we'll approach that limit much slower. 

another important man gone from the site i guess

o7 bros

I feel the argument of "trans-age" can go wrong in multiple ways.

(e.g. criminal system)

is penis envy real?

this died

thoughts?

How about as a proposal someone drafts a diet for a generic person?

so that way it can reduce the subjectivity?

That's what I thought, seems very subjective. 

what is the public opinion on diet battles

bump ?!?

I think the to-be term for legibility should also include some requirements of readability (e.g. an entire debate shouldn't just be one 5000 character paragraph)

oh yay mafia!

I'd love to join lol

/in