Bones

Trans women are women.

1. What do you think of this video. 
   
2. How do you define women? 
   

• The laptop hard drive Matt Gaetz now claims to be in (illegal) possession of?
  

Legally in the USA, personhood begins at birth.

I stand by personhood mattering more than the mere fact of DNA 

if out of body experiences are true, that's evidence the afterlife is true.

And let me reiterate something else.  God does not want people to burn in Hell either.  

Yet he chooses to send them there? God is omnipotent I'm sure he had other options. 

I suppose if you prefer that God shouldn't believe in justice and he shouldn't worry about telling lies nor in giving people the opportunity to do the right thing then that might make sense

Your supposition is incorrect. What part of making homosexuals burn for eternity is a contribution to justice? 

Stop being so narrow minded.  You tried to reason by omnipotence. You think power is the only thing that needs to be considered.  But it is not. I've already told you this is not about homosexuality. It is about treason. Rebellion.  That is the issue. There is more in this universe at stake than simply one narrow issue. Don't get so locked into it that you forget your humanity, 

Are their homosexuals in Heaven more worried about themselves - than they are about praising God? I doubt it. To even ask that question - demonstrates persuasively that you have never understood Christianity, 

Homosexuals don't make a choice in becoming homosexuals. 

Well you need to come and live in the real world for just a little while. The ordinary view today is that people's views about sexual orientation is fluid.

Harry Potter's creator has been canceled because she believes in feminism and not fluidity.  

Me, I  object to fluidity.

I think science trumps feelings. Facts over emotions I say. Yes, I know that is anti-modern thinking and likely to lead me to getting canceled. but I do think that a man is a man and female is a female.  

I think people choose to be homosexual

My personal view is that each of your arguments p1 - p4 are flawed.  Why? 

What is free will? You don't explain that. 

And let me reiterate something else.  God does not want people to burn in Hell either.  

Yet he chooses to send them there? God is omnipotent I'm sure he had other options. 

I suppose if you prefer that God shouldn't believe in justice and he shouldn't worry about telling lies nor in giving people the opportunity to do the right thing then that might make sense

There is not one person in Hell just because they are a homosexual. And nor is there one person in Heaven just because they are a heterosexual. I take the view that there are heterosexuals in Hell and there are homosexuals in heaven.

We have made a choice - and since he tells the truth and is not a liar or vindictive but just we are sentenced and judged according to our desires. 

I amend my prior statement - if I were an omnipotent being I would not create a deterministic world in which the "sins" of people are necessary events.  

Ok. But you are not God. And for whatever reason God preferred to love and give people an opportunity to freely love him back. He didn't want robots. 

 Do you think that any judge actually wants someone to be put in prison?

And let me reiterate something else.  God does not want people to burn in Hell either.  

Do you think that any judge actually wants someone to be put in prison? 

I don't want gays to burn in Hell. What a load of nonsense.  I don't want anyone to burn in Hell.  

Nope - you are totally wrong. The Bible is not homophobic. 

• moving pfp like discord. 
  
• customisation of banners. 
  
• images in debate so graphs and whatnot can be incorporated
  
• group messages
  

In terms of religion, I am an atheist. 

- So the extra 1 of doubt is just for the heck of it.

Or maybe it's because men only care about what other men are doing because it's some sort of macho b*******.

How would you have responded to Matt's question of what do you define as a women? From my perspective, it seems that you are defining gender as broadly as you can, so that anyone can morph into, or in your terms, discover their gender. Do you not think that a term such as "sex", of which is grounded in biology, is more stable? 

Nope, because gender is grounded in biology as well

your mind is as biologic as your junk, thats something that needs to be expressed very clearly. What being a woman is, is how you experience it, it seems to me like you are trying to needlessly narrow it. But I always priortize the brain to the junk, sorry buddy. 

I said that this is a discovery, which does not imply change. You have misunderstood as a very fundamental level.

I have said that you discover your gender does not match and ought to be priortized.

This is a false equivalence. Phobias and other anxiety disorders are caused by some type of dysfunction in the amygdala and related brain areas. Trans activists do not believe there is anything dysfunctional about transgendered people. Moreover, when someone switches their gender, there is no inspection on whether there are any biological ties to the reason they believe they are the opposite gender. If you have a phobia, there is a quantifiable and understandable reason for your reaction. 

You have utterly missed the point of the analogy. I am a trans activist, once again "switched" is the wrong verb here, you have truly learned nothing.

But I'll explain this before ending the conversation. The point of the analogy was to point out how it depends on individual experience and how what seems irrational or unintuitive for one person is not for another.

I would reccomend trying to look a bit deeper. 

Do you understand the difference between biological sex and gender?

 I can send a challenge if you wish. How do you define your God? With the common omni attributes? 

- I'd rather we agree on the parameters before engaging in debate. Of course I'd be arguing for the Islamic definition of God. That is, a singular, necessary, absolute, transcendent being.  Anything I should know about your side of things?

You indicated that the provided were the topics you are willing to debate ,which is why I added it. No worries if you've changed your mind. 

- Any other topics you're interested in?

Democracy is a terrible government system

God Is (exists)

Let's get these two on the road. Shall I initiate them? 

- What are the parameters, rules, definitions...etc? I'd much rather debate the Islam related topics there though. 

If you are referring to transgender people, "changing your gender" is disingenuous. As I have explained, there is no "changing of gender" which occurs, they do not suddenly "become" the gender they identify as. They discover that they are indeed that gender, now, you might make an argument about changing one's phenotypical sexual features or "sex" but that is entirely different and does not correlate with this situation. 

The proper time to come out as trans is whenever you genuinely discover your gender identity. Sometimes you aren't right, most times people are, and I'm not willing to let all of the people who could be helped by pro-trans legislation get hurt because of the extreme extreme outlier.

Why do people sometimes have panic attacks when it comes to harmless spiders or snakes? Because the brain is not always rational, because sometimes societal expectations label themselves onto them, and - this is important - gender expression is unique to the individual. Which is to say some people feel like to express that they individually are male they have to do x or y. The big problem is when you expose your own individual gender expression on other people, because this causes this dehabilitating effect. 

Democracy is a terrible government system

God Is (exists)

In the theist's world - evil is condemned by God - and is dealt with through Jesus. 

Permission is an odd thing to suggest.  You fail to delineate between first and second causes.  God set up a system in the OT to punish evil. He also set up a system to deal with individual evil. Why fail to mention these things? Are they inconvenient truths?  

I have argued elsewhere that the existence of evil is definitive proof that God exists.  A disorder demonstrates that the world we live in is not perfect - and has rebelled against God and his designs. It is evidence of sin and its destructive power.  

One might suggest that Adam and Eve by intentionally disobeying God - willed for every consequence because of that choice…If Adam had not sinned, cancer would not be a thing. 

Christians don't hold to the view that God won't intervene if he chooses to. We don't say that God won't interfere with free will. In fact we say the opposite - God will interfere - and does in every person who becomes a Christian. 

It is precisely because it requires God to interfere with your Free Will that anyone becomes a Christian. 

All abortions should be banned. Even if the fetus has no head,legs or arms. One of the companies I own makes coat hangars.

I have a 'meta' AMA question for you that in particular I feel is worth asking to you given the depth of your OP and posting it in the DART section, rather than personal...

Why did you make the AMA?

However, to claim to have an objective viewpoint that there "are" two genders, is mistaken in the sense that you are imagining that you can appeal to biology or some other concrete science to make a final decision and end the process of negotiation. For example, if the "aje activists" wanted to divide age by 2, so that we referred to 1 year olds as 0.5, 10 year olds as 5 in "aje," and so on, it would make no sense to say that people are "really, scientifically" a certain age/aje.

But it's not the lawmakers fault that a certain race commits crimes, or are more prone to illegally immigrating. Sure, you can assert that the Trump Mexican wall discriminates against Mexicans but it just so happens that it is Mexicans who attempt to illegally enter - if they didn't enter then there would be no discrimination. 

It's the law itself that is discriminatory.

I don't debate anymore, I don't have the time. You can tell by the amount of time that I actually spend the website now-a-days

you did not rebuttal my argument.

explain how the problem of evil is sound