Bringerofrain

Anyone who says those topics are an automatic loss against a good debater is incorrect and probably doesn't have a strong background in philosophy. 

The first extremist was Cain

I guess speed beat me to it. What he said though.

GP says he doesn't want to do it. Not that he won't. Just make it clear he is lynched tomorrow if we don't have role confirmation. I will support a dp2 lynch of him, not a DP1 lynch of GP. If we are afraid he is opening himself up to a mislynch, we can just no lynch today, and his vig shot acts in place of our lynch. 

I agree with RM. If you are undefeated than you just aren't challenging yourself enough. If I had 100 in a row, I would find intentional ways to handicap myself. Otherwise it seems boring. 

Honestly in my condition, you try a lot of experimental things, full well knowing they are mostly pseudo science on the off chance something works. My rule is that I don't try anything too costly that will leave my family in debt when I am dead. 

Fine, but you won't listen to me. Get 40% of your total macronutrients from protein. Seriously, drop the simple carbs, keep complex carbs, but mostly get 40% of macros from protein. 

I microdose LSD. Sometimes I just get messages from the realm of the divine. I can't help that shrooms elves told me you were scum. Maybe the elves lied to me, but they usually are right. I'm down for a supa lynch. Let's see if we can get others on board, and I doubt grey parrot cares about my opinion on who to VIG, particularly when he seems that favor conservative actions using the VIG

Out of supa and pie, which one do you want to lynch and which one do you want to vig

I don't know man. I want a lynch DP1. Certainly willing to go pie or supa. I keep flipping as to each one I prefer. Supa even admits to reading the thread but couldn't be bothered to make a half hearted shit post when he was reading through. 

Here is the link to the stream that 90% of senators were too corrupt to listen to. https://youtu.be/g0RWaAE13Cs

The covid relief bill is going to be read for 10 hours straight so the people voting on it, know what is in it. Apparently only 4 senators care about what they are signing and are willing to listen. 2 democrats and 2 republicans . 

What do you think of my ideal for the reeducation videos, so the people posting those topics understand why they had their content censored?

It is also inconsistent

I d don't think the problem with bold is a site issue. RM says it happens to him sometimes also and is an android glitch

Lol, that's funny. If that policy would eliminate all republicans, that is pretty sad.

I agree with that. Have him confirm his role or lynch him next dp. Or at least reevaluate. It's also a common SK claim as well, but we only need to worry about that when we see 2 scum dead

I want to unvote but the site is sending me to the front page when I press the bold key

I only have modded like 5 games on mafiascum but I always find myself hoping the scum team wins. 

Do you want to bring supa up to L1 for added pressure now that Gp has claimed?

Michael Moore mentioned all those things in farenheit 9/11. It was a pretty good movie tbh

I actually got those ideals from Michael Moore. The most listened to liberal academic. 

As far as democracy being a myth, I mean there is a lot of corruption at the upper echelons of society and that social engineering has a lot to do with who wins elections

Also just to be clear, I wouldn't ban topics based on level of disgustingness but the impact of that ideal gaining a foothold in the mind of large numbers of youth. The argument may even be correct in some of those instances but should be banned anyway. For example some races of people do have higher IQs than others, but if it is argued that race a has a lower IQ than race b in the debate than the debate should be removed and the debater making the argument enter some sort of education program before being allowed to make more topics. Something like a short video and questionnaire to help them learn the correct opinions about these sorts of things. What is the process for starting a meep?

I was neither making fun  or supporting incel's. Just pointing out some of their arguments about being genetically inferior may have merit. 

Thank you

I don't disagree with that. However them having stupid motives, does not make the opinion I stated in the op wrong.

I am pretty gullible but I need citations.

My understanding is that kids are usually asymptomatic, but I have heard nothing about them being less infectious.

I like maximizing town directed kills, but I understand why people are usually conservative with vigs. 

I have 3 threads being ignored. Hot topics too. One is teachers being back in school too soon. One is about dangers of free speech and the other is about conservatives voting against their own self interests. Can you guys give input on those subjects

Fair point. I am just super aggressive

Take your shot every night. I know this is controversial but my philosophy is to maximize the ration of town directed vs scum directed kills

If people never hear extremist arguments, they will never be able to be persuaded to be extremists. 

I know free speech is something a lot of people here hold dearly, but it can be bad for dialogue. It might be cute to even argue in favor of disgusting things like being pro serial killer in a debate. However we need to focus on how certain beliefs can harm society and how we should not even tolerate those beliefs. I would propose banning certain topics such as what follows.

1. Nuclear war is good

2. Murder is good

3. Rape is good

4. Women are inferior to men

5. Some races are superior to others

These topics can have real world consequences, particularly since the site has a very young demographics and are very impressionable. 

I know this might be controversial, but the site should eliminate any notion that all speech is acceptable or will be tolerated. Anything considered disgusting by normative ethics should be banned.

Supa is answering questions that me and pie have sent him, but if prong the game. He is lurking. I just know that sort of behavior is a mild scum tell and should be punished. 

That town confirms me. Nice. The only town co firmed player wants to lynch supa. Let's do this

I love watching his old interviews. I hate myself for agreeing with practically every thing he says

Dude just vote for supa lol. Let's go to the next dp. Supa is lurking. I will be so mad if he's town.

9. Floyd mayweather

10. Paqiou or however you spell his name.

There is less than 20 famous boxers so the list should be short

Let's list all famous boxers and o ly famous ones. Please add to this list.

1. Holyfield

2. Tyson

3. Butter bean

4. Sugar ray leonard

5. George foreman

6. Buster douglas

7. Joe Frasier

8the russian from rocky

Joe Joyce probably edited his own wikipedia page. It looks like he is a nobody with no titles

Dude is no Evander Holyfield or anybody famous like that. 

This is odd. My PM says he has no titles. 

Hey man. Why you answering questions but inactive here? 

Supa is online answering questions but ignoring the game. We can ignore my gut for now let's lynch supa.

Let's lynch supa. He is active just answering two of our questions but ignoring the game

WTF, I pray you are not making these up. 

How many laws of pie does he have and are they written down in a single easy to find location?

Damn it. I think I have the scum team nailed as chris and pie, but that analysis and his last couple of posts means I am changing my vote

Fos not for

I am very bothered by how pie's responses to my accusation seem to imply he knows I am town. 

Read Pie's last to messages to me. How does he know I am town falsely accusing him with no evidence and not scum falsely accusing because I don't care about evidence? 

My vote is still on chris though but hard fos

That was somehow a soft claim for my role