BrotherD.Thomas

Miss Tradesecret, as proven, the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus in having a sex a change from her male status to a 14 year old female,

Subsequent to you wiping the egg from your face again relative to my posts to you #19 - #22 , can you possibly clear up a serious question that I logically fail to answer at this time?   It is where just how many 2nd class woman visited Jesus’ tomb in the resurrection scenario shown in the passages below, where they all contradict each other!  

The women visiting Jesus’ tomb is central to the resurrection story, and has to be without a doubt correct in every way, but how many women actually visited Jesus’ tomb?  Therefore, your known expertise in Satanically “spin doctoring” the Bible at your laughable expense, I thought you could show us logically which passage is correct and the reasoning behind your decision because they all cannot be correct when they contradict each other!

In Mark 16:1, Three women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene, a second Mary, and Salome.

In Matthew 28:1,  two women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene and another Mary.

In Luke 24:10,  at least five women visit Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, Joanna, and “other women.”

John 20:1, only one woman visits Jesus’ tomb: Mary Magdalene.

Miss Tradesecret, waiting a cogent reply this time, okay? Thank you.

.

Miss Tradesecret, as proven, the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus in having a sex a change from her male status to a 14 year old female,

Further addressing your misconstrued post #9,

YOUR MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE GOES SEVERELY WANTING IN YOU TRYING TO GET OUT OF YOUR BIBLE STUPIDITY: “Everyone else who was revived from the dead were revived”

Jesus H. Christ, your hole that you dig for yourself is NEVER deep enough for you, is it dear? LOL!

AGAIN, you would use the term "revive" if the person is not dead for an hour and still breathing and their heart is still beating, where sooner or later the person will recover, get it, medical doofus?!   

YOUR COMEDIC QUOTE OF OUR LAST DAY BODIES TO HEAVEN, WHERE YOU BEING A WOMAN WILL NOT BE GOING TO HEAVEN IN THE FIRST PLACE: “In fact this is the type of body that those who trust in Jesus will receive on the Last Day - new resurrected bodies.”

If you are going to use the term “resurrected body,” like Jesus had, and that you say we will have on the last day after our death, in Jesus giving us the example, then how come our bodies don’t disappear like Jesus’ body did after our death at any given time?  You specifically stated that Jesus’ body DISAPPEARED or VANISHED, then again, why doesn’t our bodies do this after our death if you are going to say that we will have resurrected bodies that are too disappear or vanish like Jesus' did ?

YOUR QUOTE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF AGAIN: “Only Jesus was resurrected from the dead.”

YOUR CONTRADICTING QUOTE TO THE ABOVE QUOTE: “In fact this is the type of body that those who trust in Jesus will receive on the Last Day - new resurrected bodies.“

Miss transgendered Tradesecret, listen, I have always said that you provide great comedy entertainment to this esteemed Religion Forum, even though it is at your embarrassing expense all the time!  Therefore, your stand up comedy relative to Jesus was resurrected in being different from reviving, being dead, sleep, etc., was one of your best performances into the comedy realm, bar none! I APPLAUD YOU FOR YOUR COMEDY GENIUS!

Since you have no choice in being so Bible stupid, because you are what you are, can you at least supply us with an abundance of Kleenex tissues to wipe our tears of laughter subsequent to reading your Bible stupid posts in the future?  YES?

Miss Tradesecret, as proven, the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus in having a sex a change from her male status to a 14 year old female,

Further addressing your misconstrued post #9,

YOUR QUOTE SHOWING JESUS JUST DISAPPEARED OR VANISHED: “The strips and the burial cloth appeared just as though Jesus had disappeared or simply vanished.”  

Using your quote of Jesus vanished or disappeared regarding a “resurrected body,” then how in the hell do you eliminate your Bible stupidity with this narrative subsequent to Jesus, allegedly by you, disappearing from His 3 day tomb nap, where Jesus in the following passage was in a physical form: 

As shown in the Luke passage above, Jesus was in a "physical form," where you state He disappeared!  Therefore, what is your latest "spin" on this biblical axiom, where you turn yourself into an ungodly pretzel once again when doing so?

Miss Tradesecret, as proven, the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus in having a sex a change from her male status to a 14 year old female,

Addressing your misconstrued post #9,

YOUR PLAYING WITH WORDS AND CONCEPTS OF THE RESURRECTION OF OUR ZOMBI SERIAL KILLER JESUS THE CHRIST: “Jesus on the other hand did not wake up, he did not revive from sleep or death in that sense. He was resurrected.  Quite a completely different thing.”

Miss Tradesecret, again, you go to great lengths in making yourself more Bible stupid, and stupid as well outside of the Bible relative to medical science!  You are just too funny! LOL!

A miraculous "resurrection" is when Jesus was most definitely dead (Mark 15:37), and laid in a dead state for three days, therefore you cannot use the term “revive” like you stated in context to the term "death" above because this means the person is still alive with some malady awaiting to be recovered! If you are dead for more than hour you can NEVER be “revived” by another and Jesus was dead for three days so do the simple math!  GET IT MEDICAL IGNORANT FOOL? HUH? Think, who would want to "revive" a rotting corpse after 3 days to begin with?  LOL!

Jesus being God, and His own Father, son, and Holy Ghost as well within the triune doctrine, He brought Himself back to life in 3 days in a zombi form to walk the earth once again in scaring the bejesus out of His disciples!  Jesus in this sense is as funny as you are in trying to explain away your Bible stupidity upon your resurrection topic, but you do make us laugh in doing so, we thank you!

YOUR OVERLY LYING QUOTE TO YOUR DISMAY ONCE AGAIN: “Read above my comments to you. Again I repeat, I am male.  Secondly, this is not a church. Thirdly, you have no authority over me. I am not married to you.  Females were not to disrupt the service and more than a male could.”

In answer to your LYING and DUMBFOUNDED of the Bible quotes above:

1. You are a woman as your previous profile so states: https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME9338U and where your current profile states your gender is “other” at this time, and that you are 14 years old girl in being born on December 31, 2008: https://www.debateart.com/profiles/Tradesecret

Furthermore, you ADMIT that you are a “little young girl” in these posts of yours pertaining to the unfounded notion of me allegedly stalking you:

Deducing it down to the irreducible primary, you are a woman/child and NOT a male! Case closed at your embarrassing expense, period!

2.  What does the church have to do with you being shown as a woman in relation to 1 Timothy 2:11- 12 you Bible ignorant fool, in where YOU are to remain SILENT even as a transgendered woman, period!  

3.  Miss Tradesecret, I do have authority over the woman as a superior man, because Jesus’ words state that to please Him, I must escape from the 2nd class woman like YOU, which I easily do in Bible Slapping you Silly ad infinitum: “I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare, whose heart is a trap and whose hands are chains. The man who pleases God will escape her, but the sinner she will ensnare.” (Ecclesiastes 7:26)

4.  You are not married to me? THANK YOU again in admitting that you are a woman since I am a man!  Whoopsy doo, you dig another hole and step into it again!  LOL!

5.  Again Bible fool, what does your quote of “females were not to disrupt the service (church) got to do with 1 Timothy 2:11-12?  H-E-L-L-O, anybody home?

Miss Tradesecret, I can’t count the times you have RAN AWAY from my godly posts to you, therefore not only do you remain the #1 Bible runaway in this forum, but you are also guilty of being in this forum as an ungodly transgendered woman speaking when you are NOT to speak in here in the first place, per 1 Timothy 2:11- 12!  

EXPLAIN, where do you get this authority to not follow the scriptures as a woman shown above, barring that you are a transgendered woman!

.

Miss Tradesecret, as proven, the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus at her birth in having a sex a change from her male status to female child of 14 years old,

Addressing your misconstrued post #8,

YOUR QUOTE OF ACCEPTING THAT JESUS IS A BRUTAL SERIAL KILLER:  “I have not forgotten that the God of the bible brings grace and judgment upon people in this world. I have never denied this fact.”

Yes dear, we realize that you will NEVER forget the fact that when Jesus brings “judgment” to His Hebrew creation ONLY, He brutally kills them, where when you say it is “judgment,” the end result is in one case, Jesus drowned His entire creation in an horrific suffocating deaths, praise Jesus in His ever loving and forgiving nature!

Miss Tradesecret, have you ever thought that when Jesus killed His Hebrew creation in the Great Flood, then how can an innocent baby really be evil where they need to die a horrible drowning death when they didn't know about their parents evil? Can you see this hopelessly baby treading water in Yahweh’s flood for hours as they cry out in horror to their mothers? Picture their muscles burning due to large amounts of lactic acid production, where when they finally give up, they went under and held their little breaths as acidic carbon dioxide eroded their lungs until the unbearable pain forced them to inhale, where there was no air for them to breathe. All the while, our Jesus as Yahweh God incarnate is watching! (Proverbs 15:3)

Subsequent to the young babies not being able to breath as shown above, then the water brought into their little lungs that robbed their little bodies of oxygen, causing them to go numb. As water violently rushed in and out of their little lungs, it finally laid their heavily breathing and slowly dying bodies to the bottom of the ocean as the inhaled water caused their lungs to tear and bleed profusely. All the while, our ever loving and forgiving Jesus is watching! (Proverbs 15:3)

Seriously, do you think that Jesus had a smile upon His face in watching innocent zygotes, fetus’ and babies painfully drown in this manner? Huh?

YOUR REVEALING QUOTE OF WOMEN BEING 2ND CLASS!!!!: “Again, I fully concede that females in that time, 2000 years ago were considered by their culture as second class citizens.”

YES! You finally admit that women are 2nd class citizens, then in the Bible era, AND, in the 21st century as well as biblical shown herewith: "Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain SILENT" (1 Timothy 2: 11-12) 

Since you are shown to be a transgendered woman/child of 14 years old, when are you actually going to follow Jesus’s direct words within the scriptures and NOT be in this forum as a female in “trying” to teach men your Bible spin doctoring in the name of Satan?! 

.

Miss Tradesecret, as proven,  the ungodly and admitted Transgender woman that went against Jesus at her birth in having a sex a change from her male status to female,

Addressing your post #5,

YOUR REVEALING QUOTE OF ANYONE IS STUPID IF THEY DON’T BELIEVE JESUS RESURRECTION FROM HIS 3 DAY TOMB NAP: “to reject the resurrection is to demonstrate the utter stupidity of humanity. It is to reject evidence. It is to put blind faith above the truth.”

Simply put to you Transgender Miss Tradesecret, the resurrection from death to life again was no big deal in the scriptures as a few examples of which are shown below:

 

TRANSGENDER MISS TRADESECRET:  Therefore, if you don’t believe in the other Bible resurrections shown above that are really bazaar, and are equal to Jesus' resurrection, and using your words, are you STUPID if you don't believe in the resurrection examples shown above?

.

Addressing your post #5,

YOUR QUOTE WHERE YOU FORGOT JESUS’ KILLINGS AS BEING #1 IN THIS SITUATION:  “Firstly, Romans are very good at killing people.”

Dear, again you forgot our serial killer Jesus, as Yahweh God incarnate, where He made the Roman killings look like a Boy Scout picnic,  where He killed His entire creation in the Great Flood, especially the innocent zygotes, fetus’ and babies within, and outside of the woman’s womb.  You can save your normal incoherent explanation for this happening to save yourself from another  whackydoodle response from you, where the bottom line is the fact that the end result is Jesus killed His creation, understood dear?

YOUR QUOTE OF ADMITTING THAT WOMAN ARE 2ND CLASS AND SHOULD LEARN THEIR PLACE OF BEING SILENT PER 1 TIMOTHY 2:12:  “And then there is the eye-witness of a female.  LOL! No Ancient Jewish author would have been caught dead using a female as a witness to corroborate such a story. It really is a significant issue.”  

We thank you Transgender Miss Tradesecret  in finally admitting that the woman is 2nd class, whereas before you didn’t take this position, good for you in your new enlightenment to be truthful to the scriptures for a change!  We have to ask you though, as a transgendered woman now, when are you going to follow 1 Timothy 2:12 and remain SILENT within this forum?

.

.

ADreamOfLiberty,

As in the normal case of a dumbfounded pseudo-christian like you, you have to RUN AWAY from direct posts to you that show your complete Bible stupidity and ignorance, and that is equal to Miss Tradesecret doing the same!

What happended? Too SCARED to address the following posts to you that show you to be dumbfounded of Catholic history pertaining to their Hell bound Catholic priests?

Come on, you can tell us, did you go to “Miss Tradesecret's school of  how to run away from biblical axioms and Christian truths,  and then to “try” and remain intelligent looking in the aftermath?"  Whereas, you obviously FAILED her class!

Therefore, if you are still around, and sheepishly creeping into this Religion Forum in being scared to do so, at least “try” and address your runaway posts shown below, okay?  Or, are you still trying to wipe the substantial egg from your face in being so stupid upon the topic at hand?  LOL!

.

Jesus and I will await your response to your flustering situation in this post. 

Miss Tradesecret, that goes against Jesus' teachings in so many ways,

YOUR MISCONTRUED QUOTE TO ME IN YOUR POST #63:  "Do you like picking on little girls?  Oh you are big bully, stalker and what is that other word,  you know the one. The one where big bully stalkers bully and stalk young children." 

Hmmmm, if you are what you show yourself to be in your quote above, IN ADMITTING THAT YOU ARE A GIRL/WOMAN, then you are inept in the fact that I am not stalking you, but only in having to address your complete Bible STUPIDITY all the time!  See dear, there is a difference, and if you weren't so Bible dumbfounded, I wouldn't have to easily correct you all the time that you insidiously say is "stalking" to try and save what face you have left within this forum LOL!

Whoever is writing your material for you to try and remove your embarrassment within this forum, get a new writer and do not hand this over to the equally dumbfounded of the Bible ETHANG5!

.

YOUR “LAME” GIRLY RUNAWAY QUOTE AGAIN TO MY GODLY POST #66 TO YOU:  “I reject your entire hypothesis.”

HUH?  Dear, I gave you 4 posts where you continue to SLAP JESUS IN THE FACE with your complete Bible ignorance, therefore how can you reject these posts showing you to be the continued #1 Bible Fool and to not try and remedy your faults?! 

YOUR GRASPING FOR STRAWS THAT AREN’T EVEN THERE TO BEGIN WITH QUOTE: “You are the one who is stalking children. And quite literally telling them to reveal your secrets”.  

Tell the membership in what you truly mean with your quote above with actual evidence thereof, or once again wipe the egg from your face in embarrassment. Understood dear?  

YOUR COMICAL QUOTE WHERE YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE USED THE TERM “LEGAL,” LOL!:  “I am whatever I choose to identify as - as is my legal right within the forum.”

First thing dear, this forum does not protect your assumed “legal rights” because they have their rules to follow, get it?  Therefore, like it is shown by you, it is your right to continually embarrass yourself within this forum with your changing of genders, your changing of birth dates, your outright Bible stupidity and ignorance, and in you being a pseudo-christian! 

Tell us dear Miss Tradesecret, do you like to be shown to be the outright LIAR and #1 Bible fool within this forum?

YOUR  ADMITTANCE IN LYING PROFUSELY: “I have amended my age in my profile.”

Yes dear, when you CHANGED your profile AGAIN, where it shows that you LIED in your previous profiles that directly go against Jesus’ teachings herewith:  “No one who practices deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue before my eyes.” (Psalm 101:7)

YOUR OUTRIGHT AND PATHETIC QUOTE OF JESUS AND I LIE ABOUT HIS WORDS THAT I HAVE DIRECTED TO YOU: “You on the other hand ought to desist with your lies and misrepresentations.”

Dear, YOU are the one sheepishly running away from my godly posts to you that represents you have stepped in the proverbial poo again, and again, and where you are to embarrassed to at least “try” and address them! 

  

YOUR CONTRADICTING QUOTE ONCE AGAIN, HOW SAD:  “And please keep to the topic or leave it.” 

Listen up Bible fool, I am on topic when I bring forth that you are a woman as you admit too, and the fact that you directly go against 1 Timothy 2:12! ? Furthermore, I am on topic with ALL of my posts that you cannot address within this thread, other than to run away from them, understood?!   I have shown you why you are blatantly wrong about the "sword" scenario and other aspects of your pitiful thread.

.

.

In addressing your post #67, you have now CHANGED YOUR BIRTHDAY AGAIN to being at the age of 14 from previously being 12, where this age went against the rules of this forum that you violated because you at  least had to be 13 years of age to post here!   

Miss Tradesecret as a woman born on January 1, 1969 in being 53 years old.

Miss Tradesecret as an "other" gender born on December 31, 2010 in being 12 years old.

NOW, Miss Tradesecret as an "other" gender born on December 31, 2008 in now being  14 years old.

Dear, as if you admitting that you were an ungodly SEXUAL DEVIANT in the past which directly goes against Jesus’ doctrine (1 Corinthians 6:9), and admitting that there is FICTION within the Bible (Proverbs 30:6), and where you said that any offspring that curses their parents should be KILLED (Leviticus 20:9) wasn’t embarrassing enough for you, then you further embarrass yourself in you admitting again you are a woman going against 1 Timothy 2:12, and that you went from being 53, to 12, and NOW 14 years old!    Where does your ungodly LYING embarrassment end?!  

2. “You shall not permit a sorceress to live. (Exodus 22:18)

3.  “A man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.” (Leviticus 20:27) 

Furthermore, thank Jesus that you will not be going to heaven, but the alternative, which is HELL, praise Jesus' revenge upon Satanic Witch Craft:

.

It is truly amazing in how ADREAMOFLIBERTY can stay within this esteemed forum and make an ungodly fool of himself in front of the membership!  As you are aware, Jesus and I haven't even started to bloodlet this Bible fool yet.  I am afraid that when we put the final touches upon him, there won't be anything left because of your brutal and logical assault upon him with facts that he cannot address and remain intelligent looking in the aftermath!  Can you please leave a modicum of his ungodly presence for me to draw the final curtain on him?  I thank you in advance. 

In the name of my serial killer Jesus, praise!

.

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense:

MY TRUTHFUL QUOTE OF YOUR FLUSTERING MODUS OPERANDI:  “If you are an attorney, you are LOUSY at your job in not reading about the hell bound RATzinger upon this topic FIRST …”

YOUR EVER SO WANTING AND IGNORANT RESPONSE:  “I had a good laugh when I imagined those words being used by a prosecutor. 'Objection your honour the prosecution doesn't know for a fact my client is hellbound.' As for your list of people complaining, that only proves this is a widely held belief; not that it is well founded.”

Barring the FACT that I had shown your complete IGNORANCE in giving you the true MO of the hell bound RATzinger, that you silently put aside in a hush-hush manner as if it didn’t exist, and where you HID FROM IT, it included, in part, RATzinger admitting he was wrong in not indicting pedophile priests for their ungodly buggering of innocent children!!!!  

You take the outright "sheepish position" of mums the word and say “I didn’t see these links that you gave me about RATzinger in showing him GUILTY of letting pedophile priests SCREW innocent children, “neener, neener, neener, I can’t hear you, sorry, yada, yada, yada, so there!” :(P

RATzinger failed to act over pedophile priests screwing little kids:

RATzinger asks for forgiveness in not handling child sex abuse properly:

RATzinger ADMITS in giving false claims to sexual abuse of children that were BUGGERED by priests!:

RATzinger faulted over child buggering sex claims

RATzinger begs forgiveness from child victims of being buggered by priests:

RATzinger accused of inaction in sexual abuse cases more so than not:

RATzinger didn’t think it was a priority to come down on priests that screwed innocent children:

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense:

YOUR QUOTE IN HOPING THAT I WILL NOT MAKE YOU THE CONTINUED BIBLE FOOL IN THIS FORUM ABOUT CATHYLICK PEDOPHILE PRIESTS:  “I get the impression shaming others is a tool you reach for quite often but it will be totally useless against me I assure you.”

It’s not shaming, its just your complete ignorance to the topic at hand of you defending pedophile Cathylick priests that needs to be corrected by Jesus and I at your embarrassing expense, understood? Huh? Yeah, secretly, you do. 

You defend the defenseless pedophile priests, and directly go against Jesus’ words herewith: “So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin.” (James 4:17)

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense:

A PART OF MY EXTENSIVE QUOTE TO YOU THAT YOU:  “Listen up, Google about how survivors and experts who work in the field of child sex abuse will tell you there are many reasons why it’s difficult for some to report Cathylick priest sex abuse. Denial, fear and shame, AND jeopardizing your church association, are just a few of the reasons.”

YOUR WEAK QUOTE IN RESPONSE:  “Aside from the jeopardizing association that is par for the course in abuse allegations. So the contention is that the church will seek retribution against someone if they go to the police? Any evidence of this? Mind you it would be "the church" not just a small conspiracy of one or two people in a parish.”

AGAIN, I am not going to do your homework in the context of your quote above, it is known that the facts of the flock are leery in bringing the hell bound RCC church to the police because of the ramifications that I proposed before in my post #5.  Now, if you need help in doing your own homework, I  can get my neighbors 6 year old first grader boy named "Timmy" to help you, and set you straight, okay?  At your embarrassment once again, let me know if you need Timmy’s help!  LOL

.

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense:

MY REVEALING QUOTE TO YOU: “ …furthermore, do you deny that Catholic priests were buggering innocent children? Yes or no?”

YOUR OUTRIGHT SICKENING UNGODLY QUOTE IN RETURN!!!: “No, it inevitably happened to some degree. Just like it is inevitable that Amazon employees or Disney employees buggered innocent children at some point.”

You have the audacity to actually state it “happened to some degree," whereas one time in a smelly old man pedophile priest buggering an innocent young child is too many times, understood Bible fool?!  How sickening can you get?!

Then you used the unpalatable notion of Disney employees buggered young children too, as if this gets your Cathylick Priests off the hook!  Listen up Bible fool, the Cathylick church and pedophile priests that are to be trusted by young children, and that bugger them anyway, and Disney employees that do the same is MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE concepts you dumbfounded Bible idiot! H-E-L-L-O?!  Do I need to explain this simple deduction further to you at your expense again?

ADREAMOFLIBERTY, in just how dumbfounded are you going to be within this forum? 

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense

YOUR QUOTE IN POST #21 THAT GOES NOWHERE AGAIN: “It is not its own nation outside of the Vatican.  Maybe people should stop spreading rumors like that and more people would report crimes to the police rather than the church.”

Uh, what part of the following statements I made to you relative to your quote above didn’t YOU understand?

Google about how survivors and experts who work in the field of child sex abuse will tell you there are many reasons why it’s difficult for some to report Cathylick priest sex abuse. Denial, fear and shame, AND jeopardizing your church association are just a few of the reasons. Remember, the mind set of Hell bound Cathylicks is that the priest is always right, he was sent by Jesus to herd the flock in believing whatever the priest says is correct.

“A Cathylick priest has a unique position in society in general. They enjoy an exalted position where they were trusted more than anyone if you are a Cathylick. The flock were taught if you say anything bad about a priest it’s a sin and God will punish you and so priests were held up on a high platform.”

The parents, often times, if the kid said something to them, parents would not believe them! “Father would never do that, you must have misunderstood in what He did to you.” Or Jesus forbid, the parents would punish their children for saying what they did about the priest which was even worse and that was common as well. The innocent buggered kids wouldn’t say anything because they were intimidated by the priest and family!

Buggered by priest kids in younger years were totally confused and stunned by what was happening to them because they knew nothing about sex. They knew that whatever was happening was being done by a priest and so they were totally confused because priests don’t sin! And it is said a great number of victims who were sexually violated didn’t report it to anyone!

DO NOT MAKE ME REITERATE TO YOU AGAIN, UNDERSTOOD?!

ADreamOfLiberty.

Addressing your post#21 to me at your expense;

MY REVEALING QUOTE TO YOU: “In your post #5 to me, you seem to be coming to the defense of Catholicism relating to their buggering pedophile priests.  So, the obvious question has to be asked, are you a Hell bound Cathylick?  SCARED to answer this question?”

YOUR PITIFUL AND RUNAWAY RESPONSE TO ME: “The question is irrelevant as the answer can only be used for a poisoning the well fallacy.”

Oh, oh, we have another little boy RUNAWAY where ADREAMOFLIBERTY like I said would be to SCARED to answer a very simple question of whether he was a Cathylick, but instead, he had to use the ol’ worn out excuse of “Poisening the Well” fallacy to try and save more embarrassment to himself! LOL!!!

Logic 101 precludes that if you can’t answer your division of religious faith when questioned, and in this case ADREAMOFLIBERTY in being a Cathylick, then you obviously are a Cathylick but you don’t want to admit it for obvious reasons of your embarrassing churches misdeeds!  2+2=4.

This is what Jesus thinks of the Bible fool ADREAMOFLIBERTY and the ramifications thereof: “For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words, of him will the Son of Man be ashamed when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.” (Luke 9:26)

ADREAMOFLIBERTY, your empty response above is as empty as your totally embarrassing profile that equally shows absolutely NOTHING!  Therefore, Jesus and I are going to have a lot of fun in easily batting you around like a little toy in showing this esteemed DEBATEART Religion Forum in what you truly are, a pseudo-christian at best, that slaps Jesus in the face by remaining silent to your faith!

.

.

ADreamOfLiberty,

YOUR QUOTE OF DESPAIR: “If there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt of this, that would be a conspiracy to obstruct justice and is a crime almost everywhere (not always called that). Perhaps you should report it.”

Duh!  The RCC is like its own nation with its own rules, furthermore, do you deny that Catholic priests were buggering innocent children? Yes or no? As for me reporting it is laughable because I am just the messenger. Conversely, and in the same vein, why aren’t you reporting it? GET IT?”

YOUR VAIN ATTEMPT TO RUN FROM THE TRUTH REGARDING AN IMAGE:  "https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME971QU   I'm afraid that is just a meme."

NO, you're afraid that what was shown in the image is the TRUTH!  You can call it whatever you want, but the FACT remains that Cathylick priests screwed innocent little children, and said church hid this fact for years, period!  Understood?!

YOUR QUOTE OF GRASPING FOR STRAWS: “So the theory is that parents of a child suspected their child had received anal penetration from a priest...  the priest told the child to keep it a secret, and these parents did not go to the police, they wrote the church a complaint.... No I'm afraid that doesn't add up. The reaction of 99.95% of parents upon such a suspicion being formed ranges between calling the FBI, local, and state police within a one hour period and buying a gun to kill the suspected person."

Listen up, Google about how survivors and experts who work in the field of child sex abuse will tell you there are many reasons why it’s difficult for some to report Cathylick priest sex abuse. Denial, fear and shame, AND jeopardizing your church association, are just a few of the reasons. Remember, the mind set of Hell bound Cathylicks is that the priest is always right, he was sent by Jesus to herd the flock in believing whatever the priest says is correct.

“A Cathylick priest has a unique position in society in general, where they enjoy an exalted position where they were trusted more than anyone if you are a Cathylick. The flock were taught if you say anything bad about a priest it’s a sin, and God will punish you and so priests were held in high esteem.”

The parents, often times, if the kid said something to them about a priest regarding sexual contact, the parents would not believe them! “Father would never do that, you must have misunderstood in what He did to you.” Or Jesus forbid, the parents would punish their children for saying what they did about the priest which was even worse and that was common as well. The innocent buggered kids at times subsequently to an abuse wouldn’t say anything because they were intimidated by the priest and family!

Buggered by priest kids in younger years were totally confused and stunned by what was happening to them because they knew nothing about sex. They knew that whatever was happening was being done by a priest and so they were totally confused because priests don’t sin! And it is said a great number of victims who were sexually violated didn’t report it to anyone!

Now, for your homework to not embarrass yourself any further upon this topic, GOOGLE what is said above with child abuse organizations of sex abuse within the Catholic Church, and you will be weeks and months in understanding that the above actions are true at your expense in seemingly defending a totally despicable Cathylick church!

YOUR FAULTY CLAIM QUOTE OF NOT DOING YOUR HOMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE BURNING IN HELL RATZINGER!!!!:  “If it wasn't for ratzinger claiming for the church the role of criminal investigator you wouldn't even have the accusations you have now, yet now you accuse him of being part of the coverup.”

LIAR!!!  Your total ignorance upon RATzinger not being a major part of the RCC coverup is without bounds!  Your complete ignorance upon this topic is duly noted by the membership, thank you!    If you are an attorney, you are LOUSY at your job in not reading about the hell bound RATzinger upon this topic FIRST, before you remove one foot to insert the other at your embarrassing expense!  Priceless stupidity on your part! LOL!

The following links are but a FEW of MANY in showing RATzinger hiding sexual abuse by Cathylick priests!

RATzinger failed to act over pedophile priests screwing little kids:

RATzinger asks for forgiveness in not handling child sex abuse properly:

RATzinger ADMITS in giving false claims to sexual abuse of children that were BUGGERED by priests!:

RATzinger faulted over child buggering sex claims

RATzinger begs forgiveness from child victims of being buggered by priests:

RATzinger accused of inaction in sexual abuse cases more so than not:

RATzinger didn’t think it was a priority to come down on priests that screwed innocent children:

ADreamOfLiberty, now wipe the proverbial egg from your face in now knowing “what you think you knew, YOU DIDN’T!”  If you continue in this vein, Jesus and I will Bible Slap you Silly®️ in front of the membership, do you understand ignorant of the FACTS fool?  Yes? Maybe?

.

Therefore, which one of the God concepts that are listed below is the reader referring too, because it does matter?

Azura Mazda, Angus, Belenos, Brigid, Dana, Lugh, Dagda, Epona, Allah Aphrodite, Apollo, Ares, Artemis, Atehna, Demeter, Dionysus, Eris, Eos, Gaia, Hades, Hekate, Helios, Hephaestus, Hera, Hermes, Hestia, Pan, Poseidon, Selene, Uranus, Zeus, Mathilde, Elves, Eostre, Frigg, Ganesh, Hretha, Saxnot, Shef, Shiva Thuno, Tir, Vishnu, Weyland, Woden, Yahweh, Alfar, Balder, Beyla, Bil, Bragi, Byggvir, Dagr, Disir, Eir, Forseti, Freya, Freyr, Frigga, Heimdall, Hel, Hoenir, Idunn, Jord, Lofn, Loki, Mon, Njord, Norns, Nott, Odin, Ran, Saga, Sif, Siofn, Skadi, Snotra, Sol, Syn, Ull, Thor, Tyr, Var, Vali, Vidar, Vor, Herne, Holda, Nehalennia, Nerthus, Endovelicus, Ataegina, Runesocesius, Bacchus, Ceres, Cupid, Diana, Janus, Juno, Jupiter, Maia, Mars, Mercury, Minerva, Neptune, Pluto, Plutus, Proserpina, Venus, Vesta, Vulcan, Attis, Cybele, El-Gabal, Isis, Mithras, Sol Invictus, Endovelicus, Anubis, Aten, Atum, Bast, Bes, Geb, Hapi, Hathor, Heget, Horus, Imhotep, Isis, Khepry, Khnum, Maahes, Ma"at, Menhit, Mont, Naunet, Neith, Nephthys, Nut, Osiris, Ptah, Ra, Sekhmnet, Sobek, Set, Tefnut, Thoth, An, Anshar, Anu, Apsu, Ashur, Damkina, Ea, Enki, Enlil, Ereshkigal, Nunurta, Hadad, Inanna, Ishtar, Kingu, Kishar, Marduk, Mummu, Nabu, Nammu, Nanna, Nergal, Ninhursag, Ninlil, Nintu, Shamash, Sin, Tiamat, Utu, Mitra, Amaterasu, Susanoo, Tsukiyomi, Inari, Tengu, Izanami, Izanagi, Daikoku, Ebisu, Benzaiten, Bishamonten, Fukurokuju, Jurojin, Hotei, Quetzalcoatl, Tlaloc, Inti, Kon, Mama Cocha, Mama Quilla, Manco Capac, Pachacamac and Zaramama, Vera.

MISS TRADESECRET 12 YEAR OLD GIRL QUOTE IN POST #6 AND #7 IN HER PITIFUL “PEACE OR SWORD” THREAD: “It is clear that Jesus usage of the term "sword" is metaphorical not literal”

Miss Tradesecret's Bible stupidity  erroneously states in her quote above that Jesus' sword was metaphorical, NOT!

As we have seen so many times since this Bible fool Miss Tradesecret has been upon this forum, she Satanically tries to rewrite the scriptures at her expense!  In Jesus being the serial killer Yahweh God incarnate, and in Him using the term “sword,” He meant it to be as intended, a sword to kill as the following “inspired by Jesus passages show below:"

The 12 year old girl Miss Tradesecret looks to be on the run again in not responding to my over abundance of posts to her in the following thread https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7337-how-do-you-know-the-bible-is-true?page=15 and within her embarrassing thread of "Peace or Sword" as well.  Whats new? NOTHING! 

.

Miss Tradesecret, shown to be a 12 year old girl that goes against DEBATEART rules as being underage: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/7458/post-links/321275

I am following Jesus’ inspired words in CORRECTING YOUR BIBLE STUPIDITY once again:  ”As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear.” (Timothy 5:20)

YOUR QUOTE IN POST #322 CHANGING THE WORDS OF JESUS RELATING TO GENESIS 1 VERSE GENESIS 2 IN ITS BLATANT CONTRADICTION OF CREATION: “Ch 1 is talking about earth.  Animals made first and humans next. Ch 2 is talking about heaven. Humans first and animals second.”

Dear, your quote above starts off with a blatant contradiction in their only being ONE CREATION story! OMG, LOL!  Remember me telling you that you should be a comedy writer for Saturday Night Live here in the USA?   As continually shown by you, your comedy that you probably don’t know you are doing, is without equal regarding you changing biblical axioms to support your Devil Speak, bar none! LOL!!!

Before I give you another bloodbath relating to your Bible stupidity, that is if you don’t run away and hide as per your quote of blocking me, post #322, address these contradicting creation narratives barring your stupid nonsense in your quote above!

In Genesis 1 the first creation story, humans are created after the other animals. (Genesis 1:25-27)

In Genesis 2, humans were created before the other animals. (Genesis 2:18-19)

In Genesis 1, the first man and woman were created simultaneously.  (Genesis 1:25-27)

In Genesis 2, the man was created first, then the animals, then the woman Eve from Adam’s rib. (Genesis 2:18-22)

In Genesis 1, the stars were made on the 4th day. (Genesis 1:16-19)

In Job 38:4-7, the stars existed before the earth was made, where foundations of the earth are NOT related to the universal sky.

Genesis 1 states the animals were created with water. (Genesis 1:20)

Genesis 2 states the animals were created out of the ground. (Genesis 2:19)

Genesis 1 states that the fowls were created from water.  (Genesis 1:20-21)

Genesis 2 states that the fowls were created from the ground. (Genesis 2:19)

I have only listed a few of MANY contradictions within the scriptures that I have just learned to accept. YOU on the other hand, will use many insipid and irrational propositions to get out of the Bible being contradicting.

Therefore dear, which of a few examples shown below will you use this time in your ever growing EXCUSE page?

YOUR MISCONSTRUED QUOTE AGAIN IN YOUR LAME LITTLE GIRL POST #9: “Secondly, you omitted to discuss Micah 7.  Is there a reason for this save and except it does not agree with your position.”

NO, little girl Bible fool, my statement in question is in “addition too,” Micah 7.  Do the simple math if you can to recognize this simple deduction? DUH!

The question that you have yet to answer yourself, but only to get other opinions to use before you “try” to do it, is plainly that Jesus was a hypocrite in His one side of having a peaceful nature, and then turning into a serial killer upon His Second Coming, on His other side, bar none, period!

YOUR PITIFUL ONCE AGAIN QUOTE OF WHY I AM NOT SPIN DOCTORING YOUR QUESTION LIKE YOU DO ALL THE TIME:  “Now answer the question….  in doing so you confess you don't have the capacity to think outside the box.”

Who needs to use your ungodly term of “thinking outside the box” when we have Jesus truthfully showing Himself to begin with relating to your topic at hand? 

As is shown in this forum ad infinitum, is your notion of “thinking out of the box” refers to your ungodly “spin doctoring of literal passages and narratives” if they show themselves to be disturbing, where what they say to you in this case, is not what they mean!  When you perform this “SPIN,” others like myself easily Bible Slap you Silly®️ at your embarrassment and expense!

.

Miss Tradesecret, as a woman shown herewith:  https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME9338U that goes directly against Jesus’ words in 1 Timothy 2:12, whereas she is not to teach and in being SILENT towards men!

I am following Jesus’ inspired words in correcting your Bible stupidity again, and again, and again:  ”As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear.” (Timothy 5:20)

YOUR QUOTE THAT IS MEANINGLESS TO ME AND JESUS: “Nevertheless, you will play by the correct rules or I will ignore you.”

.

Miss Tradesecret, as a woman shown herewith: https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME9338U that goes directly against Jesus’ words in 1 Timothy 2:12, whereas she is not to teach and in being SILENT towards men within this forum!

I am following Jesus’ inspired words in CORRECTING YOUR BIBLE STUPIDITY again, and again, and again:  ”As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear.” (Timothy 5:20)

I have easily found out why Miss Tradesecret is so Bible dumbfounded, and in addition to this said fact, she goes against Jesus and DEBATEART rules and code of conduct as shown below: 

1. Miss Tradesecret is a woman (https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME9338U) that is not supposed to be in this forum in trying to teach men, where she is to be SILENT (1 Timothy 2:12). Notwithstanding, as seen in the link above, Miss Tradesecret's birthday shows it to be January 1, 1969!

 

2. Miss Tradesecret is only 12 years old as her profile page so states where her birthday "now" is December 31, 2010, and then doing the simple math! https://www.debateart.com/profiles/Tradesecret 

3. Therefore the rules of DEBATEART in members User Accounts is that you have to be at least 13 years old to be upon this Religion forum to post! Since Miss Tradesecret is only 12 years old, then she cannot post upon this forum, PERIOD!