Total posts: 2,627
Posted in:
Well, that was unexpected. A grand jury apparently saw enough evidence to warrant indicting him on 16 charges. Then he goes into a room with the prosecutor and comes out with a deal and all charges dropped?
The deal being a $10,000 hit to his wallet and some community service. Sorry, prosecutors, but that is just so unequal to his crime. That would be like telling me I just have to give you ten dollars and mow some lawns. The city of Chicago says ten grand won't even cover the cost of the wasted investigation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
- Yes, I recognized you. Have any of your views changed since DDO?
No like everyone on the internet I continue to argue about issues I will almost certainly never change my core beliefs about.
I mean let's all be honest here.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
I think this is supposed to be like asking "What's the point of happiness?"So , the question then is then: for those that manage to get to Paradise, then what? What happens then? What's the point of paradise?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Do you understand that the OP is not "What do you think of the MeToo movement?"The Me Too movement wants people to listen solely to women who claim to have been raped. They might be true. If true, the rapists deserve life imprisonment. But strong evidence is needed for these accusations to be taken seriously.I don't agree nor disagree with women who claim to be raped. I believe the facts and evidence(Source The amazing Lucas).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Castin was Casten on DDO. She can't fool me.
Bitch I am a friggin' master of disguise. Future aliases:
Caston
Castan
Castyn
Behold the untapped depths of my creative genius. I have the power to utterly reinvent myself, my range is limitless. FEAR ME.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
I think your being a hypocrite.
I think your sense of humor won't answer the phone.
Ringing...
Ringing...
Ringing...
Ringing...
Nothing.
Call ended. We are not able to reach your sense of humor at this time. If you would like to be transferred to a live operator press zero.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Harikrish
When you explain the joke it kills the joke, Hari.Why do you self-identify as an idiot and why didn't I see you at the last meeting of the Council of Idiots?So you were invited and attended.
You killed my joke. You're a murderer.
You committed first degree humorcide.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
I don't understand the relationship between your post and my OP.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
Don't be ridiculous.Which one of us is the DART GOD though.No one. We are all just human beings using the internet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Which one of us is the DART GOD though. GOD in all caps even, that's pretty badass.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't want to make a full judgment about a joke I haven't heard myself. If it was funny I would've had no qualms laughing. But if you asked me seriously, I'd probably say I don't think the Catholic Church and R. Kelly can be equivocated in that way. One is a very large mixed bag of both good and bad people, and the other is one bad guy.
Created:
I would like to second Rash's counsel.
Created:
Posted in:
DART does not hate DDO, though some of our members may. If not for DDO this site wouldn't even exist. It was tragic that its owners completely abandoned it, and I think most people here who migrated from DDO shared in that disappointment. No one was celebrating.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Yassine
I was Casten on DDO. It may be hard to recognize me now because my username is so different.
Created:
Posted in:
I've been hearing people say that the music industry has been (unfairly) untouched by the #MeToo movement. Agree/disagree?
Created:
Posted in:
Well, anyone here watch it? I finally heard enough people buzzing about it that I got around to it.
No new information really, and yet a new public response.
Created:
Posted in:
Mawwiage. Mawwiage is what bwings us togevuh today.
And wuv... TWUUUUUUU wuv...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
The west really dropped the ball. The Latin Church broke away from Orthodoxy and embraced scholasticism. The protestant reformation threw out the church with the pope, and inherited scholasticism from the schismatic Latin church they rejected.Atheism is really quite naturally the child of protestant scholasticism.And really it is no surprise to us Orthodox that widespread theological ignorance leads to atheism.Unfortunately, atheists in the west think they knowingly reject Christianity when really they rejected a form of Christianity that was delivered to them corrupted from the beginning.The well has been poisoned. The ground has been salted.Orthodox evangelism is a lot more effective with protestants than with atheists. Most protestants don't believe in their churches anyway. Of course, they have been educated to be very anti-Roman Catholic which in itself is an obstacle, because there is a superficial resemblance between Orthodoxy and the Latin Church.If you simply go off of church history and the writings of the church fathers, it is a lot easier to back Orthodoxy's claim to being The Church. The Roman Catholic Church has clearly deviated.And all that might not matter to you until you realize that all Christianity in the west is descended from the schismatic Latin Church, and they have done more damage to the name of Christ than any other institution on the planet and continue to do so.
I'm curious why you wrote all this to me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Because your point was that it's just the Internet, not real life and this is a website so your brain used Internet as a synonym of 'safe-zone' or 'playground' to highlight the sandbox-like nature you were trying to imply a website has.
You're a sharp chap.
She meant her, specifically, as she may not meet the 'had 3 debates' criteria. She didn't mean every single voter.
Thx, yes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
What's your #1?I think as atheists we need to exercise a little humility here and admit that we too are merely hostages of circumstance and chaos.The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.Eccles. 9:112nd best book in bible.
I'm sure you've said before but I seem to have forgotten.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
I wouldn't mind losing my voting rights for the sake of securityThose who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.- Ben Franklin
Seems a bit dramatic to apply to an internet website.
Why did I say "internet website." Are there websites that are not on the internet, Castin? Tell me where are they?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@disgusted
Making claims regarding religious geographical beliefs is the point I'm making, atheism is not a religion. I can only speak for myself but my atheism is a result of examining and rejecting the claims of godism. All godism.
It seems like you're neatly compartmentalizing this to keep it contained to only regional religion, so that anything you self-identify with (like atheism) is safe from the scope of your argument.
But I don't think you are safe from the scope of your argument. Nor am I. Why can't what you're saying be applied to any worldview?
Your environment, experiences, and genes have caused you to be everything you are. The choice to accept or reject religion is one you make based on these random factors.
I'm not saying religion and atheism have equal footing on an argumentative basis. I'm only saying that it's probably hypocritical for one product of chance to point and laugh at another product of chance. For being a product of chance. I think as atheists we need to exercise a little humility here and admit that we too are merely hostages of circumstance and chaos.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Christianity can definitely manufacture some massive martyr complexes.Prophecy makes it very clear that what I am getting here is to be expected.You will see from Mopac's response that he is here because some Christians seek to be mocked and ridiculed for their faith. It is a way to demonstrate their faith that they don't waver.Jesus suffered, and there is a tradition that being a Christian involves suffering and being persecuted. It is very biblical, supported by many verses, such as Rom 5:3-4 "We also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope." and 1 Pet 3:14 "But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened.”"
As for why Mopac is here, I can't claim knowledge. I find your assessment compelling, but uncomfirmable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Got a bit of whiplash there, heh. I thought you were agreeing that getting rid of voters who have never debated wouldn't be a big deal. I take it you are in fact against that. I wouldn't mind losing my voting rights for the sake of security, if that was necessary. From what I see, it just probably isn't.
I also think the effort of reading through a whole debate is enough of an obstacle for potential voters to overcome -- the additional requirement of waging at least three in-depth debates yourself might drive off new participants entirely. And new prospective debaters sometimes dip their toe in the water by being a voter first.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@disgusted
You never think if you'd been born in a different place or time, to a different family, you may well have turned out Christian, Muslim, Jewish, what have you? I do.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
If you really wanted people to be receptive to your message, maybe you should have changed your dogmatic and absolutist attitude.There can be no compromise in The Truth.They do not reject me, they reject The Truth.Prophecy makes it very clear that what I am getting here is to be expected. If I was a perfect person who never erred, the response would be the same.The problem is not me.
"I refuse to change my dogmatic and absolutist attitude."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
(1) Require 3 debates that have at least 3 rounds, are not forfeited, and are not troll debatesSo users who like to vote but not debate would effectively be purged from the voting pool with this option?It's possible, which is why we might be able to do a combination of what I propose
Well it's up to you debaters as to how much of a loss that would be. You're the ones who'd be losing voters.
There may not be many of us non-debating voters. Axing us might not be a huge loss.
Created:
Posted in:
I'm sure it's merely the circumstances of my birth that have determined my atheism, too.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
If you really wanted people to be receptive to your message, maybe you should have changed your dogmatic and absolutist attitude. You can't get through to people when you've committed yourself to a pattern of behavior doomed to only drive people away.
Created:
Posted in:
I believe what I read was this word for word transcript of everything that went on in that cockpit. You can start reading at:
"At 2:02 am, the captain leaves the flight deck to take a nap. Within 15 minutes, everyone aboard the plane will be dead."
No one read this article if you're not prepared for a terrifying story about a pilot irrationally pulling back on the joystick until his plane falls out of the sky. And he and the other pilots have no idea he is causing that situation, or that all he had to do was stop pulling back on the stick.
I notice this article is dated 2011, though, so my understanding of events may be outdated.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
The story I got was the pitot tubes iced over and the plane's computer was unable to get airspeed information, so it turned itself off. The pitot tubes cleared a minute later, but the autopilot remained off. What happened afterward was a result of the pilots being unable to correctly respond to that situation. To grossly oversimplify. A complete address of all factors would be too exhausting for my lazy ass at the mo'.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Slowly we are, as a species, letting AI rule us and this habit will lead to our demise if we do not take a stand here and now. Please do not let AI become able to see and think about what the human mods cannot. A robot would skin you alive and rape your children without flinching, Virtuoso and bsh1 of course would not, that's not an exaggeration; you're trusting a psychopathic machine to become the arbiter of justice. Never do this, or our species is doomed.
Ever hear of Air France Flight 447? A commercial plane with 200+ people on board crashed basically because the computer stopped working and the pilot didn't know how to fly without it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
I'm in a state of shock.you and I both
I can't believe he would do this over something so stupid. Why the fuck was this debate worth getting permabanned for. He had to know he wouldn't get away with it.
He always made those gotcha debates, but I believed him when he said it was all a bit of good-humored dickishness. He really gave me some laughs. Remember "praise be unto hydrogen"? Damn, what a waste.
He asked me to vote in the GMO debate, but I said no. I guess he got desperate after he was unable to scare up more honest votes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
So users who like to vote but not debate would effectively be purged from the voting pool with this option?(1) Require 3 debates that have at least 3 rounds, are not forfeited, and are not troll debates
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
I must agree. Save the last bit. I can't make a claim of knowledge as to how the story was understood by Hebrews at the time.It was not an age of sophisticated literary criticism. But perhaps they, like us, couldn't resist wondering about the world and the lights in the sky. If an ordinary Hebrew was to ask about such things their priests had to have an answer. Their power and status depended on their claim of such knowledge.If people in the C21st can take Genesis literally we can be sure people 3000 years ago did. A tale of gods and magic would not seem fantastic or unlikely then; it would not be offered or received as an allegory or metaphor but as unvarnished truth.
Created:
Posted in:
They're as good as saying everything that happens is God's will, possibly one of the most annoying beliefs of all time.
And they are apparently blissfully deaf to the notion of indirect divine intervention. The idea that God helps through actors and agents and dare I say, technology and science. God's help can apparently only be a literal and direct abra-cadabra, poof the disease is gone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
I'm sure you're right. They would never agree that leaving it up to chance is what they're doing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Outplayz
Do you have a vague memory of hanging out in a garden in snake form, feeling really bitchy? Maybe we can finally get some answers here.If Christianity is true, i'm 100% confident that i'm Lucifer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrutalTruth
No. That demands an explanation beyond just "oh well they're theists." I know theists who would never buy that bullshit. That is some extra special ninth level bullshit right there.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@BrutalTruth
People only report posts they read, so no one has ever reported him.Can someone ban that dude? He's on some drugs or something. Reading his posts gives me a headache.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't see the story about evil as such; it's about why life sucks - ie why we have to work and why child-bearing hurts. The writers weren't concerned with abstracts like good and evil so as much as practical matters of obedience and disobedience.The idea that God had all these infinite and omni- powers and was 'perfect' came later. Gods were powerful, but not unlimited. If you flattered and obeyed your god he looked after your your tribe, if you didn't you'd be punished with such things as famine or defeat in war. It was a simple arrangement with no need for complex moral theory!
You can't say a story isn't about good and bad if the point is to address "If God good, why life bad?"
I am in agreement with your second paragraph.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@EtrnlVw
What do you think of religions or doctrines that say everything about the Creator comes from one source, like the Bible?Why do you believe your religion is right?I prefer to learn from all sources if they make sense. Spirituality is a huge arena, no reason to confine all of the Creator to one source that would be absurd. Religions are the interpretation of what we observe in the Theistic world, albeit a very dynamic one and not everything is accurate, and many things are true. The point of spirituality is to get involved and figure all these things out for the self.I believe there are transcendental (spiritual) experiences because of the abundance of evidence as well as my own observations and encounters. From there it's all about putting the pieces together, getting involved and applying things you would normally not.
In order to preserve a sense of authenticity, religions have to assign divine authority to some sources but not others. Otherwise followers won't know what's right and what's not. This often seems to make a holistic approach to spirituality difficult. At least from what I've seen in western religion.
Created:
Posted in:
Can anyone explain to me why some people think leaving it up to chance and letting God decide what happens are the same thing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Why do you self-identify as an idiot and why didn't I see you at the last meeting of the Council of Idiots?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Tard.Bigot.
I see we are both still ourselves, so we will of course get away with these insults per your loophole. We could probably get away with murder. We just have to do it in a way that's very "us" so we can say the magic words "I was just doing me." You could probably kill someone with prolonged semantic lecturing but I'm not sure what my method would be. Maybe to lock someone in a room with me and tell them bad jokes until they kill themselves.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
I think banned members spend the time on DDO!
It's like every banned member's first stop. After DART throws them out of bed, DDO's phone starts vibrating in the middle of the night with a text like "... you up?"
Then they go over there and trash DART to vent their feelings. Getting banned is no picnic on the emotions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
I think poly suffers from an internet version of tourettes or something. I'd rather she was insulting me than strangers IRL.
Get out of my head keith.
I've often thought, "Well at least she's letting her hate out on the internet and not on the people around her irl."
But anyway -- of course Poly has little power to seriously hurt anyone. Of course we're all desensitized to her behavior. But you're basically saying you'd like the mods to allow her to break the rules because Poly's just being Poly. Does everyone get that excuse? I wasn't aware that behaving in character allows me to get away with anything. That's a useful piece of information.
If the way you'd like it means everyone is not treated equally, then things shouldn't be the way you'd like it. No offense. Just my two cents.
Poly's right about one thing, though: every time someone gets banned we talk about them while they're not here. I acknowledge my guilt in this. I hang my head in shame.
Created: