Hmmmm. . . this debate makes about as much sense as ijb1's success rate of debates. He has 3 debates under his belt and has won 83% of them. So technically he has won 2.5 of them.
Viper sounds good here. Used a point of conception at the two male and female cells joining. At that point, a child has started it's journey in the womb. Mall seemed to go on about "outside the box" theories about self care and such things which weren't relevant to the debate. Viper said it right that a conscious decision to terminate a pregnancy without any physical challenges to the mother and child is purely murder. We allow capital punishment (death penalty) for people that are a danger to society, but we will abhor a person for killing/hurting another for the sake of convenience (I.E. muggings, road rage, child molester, etc). Stopping a pregnancy just for convenience is just like the mugger, road rager, and pedophile.
Hmmmm. . . this debate makes about as much sense as ijb1's success rate of debates. He has 3 debates under his belt and has won 83% of them. So technically he has won 2.5 of them.
Such a compelling volley from the sharpest minds on this website! I love it!
Well, that one was easy.
Viper sounds good here. Used a point of conception at the two male and female cells joining. At that point, a child has started it's journey in the womb. Mall seemed to go on about "outside the box" theories about self care and such things which weren't relevant to the debate. Viper said it right that a conscious decision to terminate a pregnancy without any physical challenges to the mother and child is purely murder. We allow capital punishment (death penalty) for people that are a danger to society, but we will abhor a person for killing/hurting another for the sake of convenience (I.E. muggings, road rage, child molester, etc). Stopping a pregnancy just for convenience is just like the mugger, road rager, and pedophile.