The "rebels" consists of major terrorist groups including Al-queda in Syria
"The Nusra Front, also known as Jabhat al-Nusra, is an Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group, comprising approximately 6,000 foreign and domestic fighters. The Nusra Front has reportedly been receiving significant funding, arms, and training from Al-Qaeda and the Al Qaeda-affiliated group, Islamic State of Iraq. Some of Nusra’s fighters are foreign jihadists, many of whom are veterans of the Iraqi insurgency; it is unclear, however, what percentage of the Nusra Front’s supporters are foreign fighters as opposed to Syrian nationals. The Nusra Front is a well-armed group that has claimed responsibility for multiple suicide bombings and asymmetric attacks against Assad-regime targets. The Nusra Front is also considered to be a fiercely sectarian Sunni group in violent opposition to Syria’s Alawite community—an ethnoreligious group of Shiite Muslims who comprise 12 percent of the Syrian population and the majority of the Assad regime."
Because This is not a troll vote... This is a genuine vote where I feel Con was just plain lazy overall. In fact, forfeiting is something I consistently don't comprehend as being bad conduct as it makes your opponent's life easier in the debate but what I do see on Con would make me tie the conduct and basically if this had been four-points debate I'd be giving S&G to Con (even though Con REALLY needs to learn to spell acronym, it is fine to be dyslexic but it is not fine to not compensate for it at all that many times when your entire R2 is one sentence and R3 is a troll-phrase.
Another reason I would give it a tie for conduct is that while Con was smarmy and lazy throughout, Pro didn't even remotely answer Con in R2. Pro was smart to use this method of scoring as Pro would be tying (3 for arg, 2+1 source and S&G to Con) had this been what I see as the superior debate-voting scoring system of the two that are currently available.
Now, the reason why Con loses is that Con assumes sourcing is everything. Let me explain something Con does wrong, Con's source is his grandma and joke or not, obvious or not, this kind of remark makes his source even less reliable than Pro's. At least Pro is here reasoning his own theory, where is Con's grandma to reason hers? Is she a renowned source of any kind? Con's source, while maybe somehow indirectly proving what he says as somewhat plausible, has headline about the raping done by Priests and basically supports Pro's case completely. While it was a better use of source than Pro's 0, this scoring system has no sources, it's winner-takes-all so... Sorry?
he doesn't know what he's talking about. Both sides of the political spectrum are NOT right!, they just diagree, I have been trying to explain this to omar for months, but his feeble mind doesn't comprehend!!!!!!!
Remember, ISIS and the rebels used to work together before falling out
https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2014/06/12/two-arab-countries-fall-apart
Its more stable
ALOHA SNAKCBARS on the rebel sides
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg5UEz_Ao0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3jbNepN6kM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiyyWiO-IKY
Watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGEc-CMsrQs
The "rebels" consists of major terrorist groups including Al-queda in Syria
"The Nusra Front, also known as Jabhat al-Nusra, is an Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group, comprising approximately 6,000 foreign and domestic fighters. The Nusra Front has reportedly been receiving significant funding, arms, and training from Al-Qaeda and the Al Qaeda-affiliated group, Islamic State of Iraq. Some of Nusra’s fighters are foreign jihadists, many of whom are veterans of the Iraqi insurgency; it is unclear, however, what percentage of the Nusra Front’s supporters are foreign fighters as opposed to Syrian nationals. The Nusra Front is a well-armed group that has claimed responsibility for multiple suicide bombings and asymmetric attacks against Assad-regime targets. The Nusra Front is also considered to be a fiercely sectarian Sunni group in violent opposition to Syria’s Alawite community—an ethnoreligious group of Shiite Muslims who comprise 12 percent of the Syrian population and the majority of the Assad regime."
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2013/05/14/63221/the-structure-and-organization-of-the-syrian-opposition/
Never heard of him in my life
Well I disagree with everything you said, go Assad!
Yeah there everywhere and they VOTE too many vote bias
great, another liberal and atheist
What's your stance on Syria and Russia
I already debated this
Through ***4*** undeniable pieces of evidence
Sorry Im taking a while, School will be over soon
Because This is not a troll vote... This is a genuine vote where I feel Con was just plain lazy overall. In fact, forfeiting is something I consistently don't comprehend as being bad conduct as it makes your opponent's life easier in the debate but what I do see on Con would make me tie the conduct and basically if this had been four-points debate I'd be giving S&G to Con (even though Con REALLY needs to learn to spell acronym, it is fine to be dyslexic but it is not fine to not compensate for it at all that many times when your entire R2 is one sentence and R3 is a troll-phrase.
Another reason I would give it a tie for conduct is that while Con was smarmy and lazy throughout, Pro didn't even remotely answer Con in R2. Pro was smart to use this method of scoring as Pro would be tying (3 for arg, 2+1 source and S&G to Con) had this been what I see as the superior debate-voting scoring system of the two that are currently available.
Now, the reason why Con loses is that Con assumes sourcing is everything. Let me explain something Con does wrong, Con's source is his grandma and joke or not, obvious or not, this kind of remark makes his source even less reliable than Pro's. At least Pro is here reasoning his own theory, where is Con's grandma to reason hers? Is she a renowned source of any kind? Con's source, while maybe somehow indirectly proving what he says as somewhat plausible, has headline about the raping done by Priests and basically supports Pro's case completely. While it was a better use of source than Pro's 0, this scoring system has no sources, it's winner-takes-all so... Sorry?
everyone's crying over one vote. LOL
Whos your profile pic?
defintions now
But France beat Birtian in the hundred years war and fought more in WW1
God this dragged on, I hate two weeks
cool
your right they can
they did
so?, what about the cameras and clinton connection
They have done a great job as well as the JFK assassination
Crazy how well they done that
Counting unrated debates, oooooooooooh bad no no
I am 5-4 in rated debates, how is that bad?
Lives on type1 debates
Cries when speedrace beats him at everything
also moved to forums, but ignores that
crybaby, who cried over the boat debate when I voted,haha
What Bullshit
What is with the poetry
I must agree with your proffesional opinion
sure
Evolution, just clearing something up :), look forward to the debate
I'm talking about a theory for the Bible and creation, day gap with evolution is one of them
No, evolution,I'm sticking to the topic
Yes, I am a Christian but I'm experimenting with ideas like Day Gap
Ok, thanks for clearing microevolution, that was going to be my first argument!
Hi!, I will be debating you today
yup
yeah uther won
do you brain?
English please
what an awful debate
I won that discussion, hands down. I am not triggered, and you cant say that when your a leftist, come on
Vape store meltdown-https://www.newsflare.com/video/266558/politics-business/meltdown-us-vape-shop-worker-refuses-to-serve-customer-wearing-trump-cap
Ultimate metldown!!!-https://nypost.com/2016/11/11/scenes-from-the-liberal-meltdown/
Forums are more laid back and better, debates have time limits I don't enjoy
he doesn't know what he's talking about. Both sides of the political spectrum are NOT right!, they just diagree, I have been trying to explain this to omar for months, but his feeble mind doesn't comprehend!!!!!!!
Ok I gotcha
well he was doomed when we misspelled racism
rip
No he isn't he just quit
Ok, I agree good luck
"that some users just do it on assumption that it's okay "
what's the matter with it