"The green new deal as proposed by AOC would essentially cut down drastically on carbon emissions and even downright eliminate them thereby easing global warming through a vast amount of government spending. "
Ok, so the U.S accounts for 14% of global emissions, it wont do anything. We still have the other 86% of emissions
not bad for a hiatus, though your not going to win sorry.
You should have pounded that the Dayton shooter was a Elizabeth Warren supporter and a rachel maddow fan and confessed that's where he got his far left radicalness, that would have pushed the offense to oromagi,a progressive
This is a must watch it is at 5:27 if the link does not work. Very scary stop watching when she is done talking about ritual
https://youtu.be/vdAfqLgjh1s?t=327
I agree with you on this one, one forfeit should not interfere with the debate, take a loot at my gambling one. There was a waive and some confusion but I set up the debate
I would be looking out for that, however I think the BOP would be on you to prove that the Bible has errors, I mean what would Con's argument be in R1, that oh they are no errors. Though, I would make a solid case(if I accept) that Biblical errors fall into 4 categories. But just a thought
I really want to get back up to 7 and 7 and a even win ratio and I think TheAtheist is a worthy opponent I can handle. I will see how things shape up in my gambling debate.
Did I do this right?, if the BOP is assumed to be shared since the Instigator didn't set it up, is it unfair to post a full argument in R1 when waived?
I'm trying to be a good debater, I just need clarity on whether my logic is right here>
What is road to extinction
Too favorable for con
"The green new deal as proposed by AOC would essentially cut down drastically on carbon emissions and even downright eliminate them thereby easing global warming through a vast amount of government spending. "
Ok, so the U.S accounts for 14% of global emissions, it wont do anything. We still have the other 86% of emissions
LOL
Good and yes CNN is terrible, this guy absolutely tears them to shreds here-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ryn7z-cp0
No, you should have stated that by this logic: bla bla bla
We already know CNN is shit with gay pedophile Bryan Stelter and crappy cuomo
not bad for a hiatus, though your not going to win sorry.
You should have pounded that the Dayton shooter was a Elizabeth Warren supporter and a rachel maddow fan and confessed that's where he got his far left radicalness, that would have pushed the offense to oromagi,a progressive
The video does, yes it does, it's called is this the face of the afterlife
satanic ritual with president bush
This is a must watch it is at 5:27 if the link does not work. Very scary stop watching when she is done talking about ritual
https://youtu.be/vdAfqLgjh1s?t=327
ooops, wrong argument! you posted it on a forum topic
Dont listen to him
ahaha
I see
Nevermind, I am way too biased, holy shit
I am trying to get better at voting, Beginning my analysis now
though I get out lat June like the last 3 days of June, northeast is different
you guys are back to school already, yikes. I dont get back until the 2nd, wtf
hehe
YEAH
logicae is like the ultra anti-nihilist
not this shit again
dammmmmmit, I was going to accpet
George Bush is the not the antichrist.
**face palm**
also he's lying, RM can never quit
Concession,vote appropriately
LOL true, Concession here-https://www.debateart.com/debates/1272/should-gambling-be-ilegal
yes, I will be 6-7, I am one step closer to getting to 50% win ratio and 1550 elo.
I agree with you on this one, one forfeit should not interfere with the debate, take a loot at my gambling one. There was a waive and some confusion but I set up the debate
I said "unfair rules" and gave you all the points LOL, but I know it will be countered
I deleted it
Since they are no rules against it, sources are here for R1
1.https://www.scribendi.com/advice/when_to_spell_out_numbers_in_writing.en.html
2https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3361844/
3.https://gambling.addictionblog.org/how-many-people-gamble/
4.https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/99-total-population-by-child-and-adult#detailed/1/any/false/871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133,38,35/39,40,41/416,417
5.https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/survey-data/Gambling-participation-in-2017-behaviour-awareness-and-attitudes.pdf
6.https://www.debt.org/faqs/americans-in-debt/
7.https://www.debt.org/advice/gambling/
8.https://www.statista.com/topics/1368/gambling/
9.https://www.statista.com/statistics/215265/sales-of-us-state-and-provincial-lotteries/
10.https://www.lotteryplaces.com/
11.https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gambling-disorder/what-is-gambling-disorder
12.https://www.nami.org/Blogs/From-the-CEO/August-2014/Criminalization-of-Mental-Illness-It%E2%80%99s-a-Crime
13.https://www.ncpgambling.org/help-treatment/treatment-facilities/
14.https://www.gambling.net/statistics.php
what a title:God measured STUFF
Note that this debate is rated and counts for something, I will try my best
Obviously RM doesn't believe this, It's just a little niece he's got while debating
Incomes BrotherDthomas!
I would be looking out for that, however I think the BOP would be on you to prove that the Bible has errors, I mean what would Con's argument be in R1, that oh they are no errors. Though, I would make a solid case(if I accept) that Biblical errors fall into 4 categories. But just a thought
Yes for oromagi, no for RM, he isn’t that good upon review though I am guilty of this is my gambling debate
RM,
"I trolled this and enjoyed it."
And.......I was right
A sweatbag will accept and massacre you, be warned
Thank you
thank you
LOL
I PM him to see if we wanted to restart this debate under good terms without any confusion
ok though I kinda made a lazy argument, I will see how it shapes up, he hasn't been online all day
I really want to get back up to 7 and 7 and a even win ratio and I think TheAtheist is a worthy opponent I can handle. I will see how things shape up in my gambling debate.
Did I do this right?, if the BOP is assumed to be shared since the Instigator didn't set it up, is it unfair to post a full argument in R1 when waived?
I'm trying to be a good debater, I just need clarity on whether my logic is right here>
ok
eh hem, 21stcenturyiconoclast is here-
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/2301/jesus-condemns-entire-cities-to-dreadful-deaths-in-hell
Some IDIOT told backwardseden he would be banned here, so he stays at DDO, that killed all hope for this website