The funny thing about agnosticism is that it is equally likely to be the position of those who think about whether God exists the least and those who think about it the most.
He knew he was trolling, you voted for a troll position and made up stupid excuses for it because you're such a bitch that me telling you to "shut up" actually offended you.
I let you rip me a new ass hole because I thought you were just being honest and trying to help, but now I see how fucked up you are for dishing out so much and taking so little.
Everything you say is an excuse to be retarded. "If you type things in a debate, they default to true even with 0 proof. Unless it's what Fishchaser says."
"If you are sarcastic and I know you're being sarcastic, then I can pick and choose how I interpret it and say you conceded when you didn't because being unbiased actually means being biased."
If you default to Christian ethics you are accepting Christianity as true by default because Christian ethics are part of Christianity you stupid piece of shit. You are the one being biased and I no longer consider you intelligent for saying that.
Maybe Con would be able to win if it wasn't an objective fact that the Christian God is evil by any reasonable definition of the word. It is also possible for him to win thanks to biased people and retards, both of which describe you.
You discovered his secret. He has a degradation kink and he was trauma bonded to Lancelot. He used to touch himself to Lancelot's abuse and he cried for 3 weeks when Lancelot was banned. He sometimes wears his mother's panties while fantasizing about Lancelot spanking him and calling him mean names.
You and RM are both autistic, both prone to hate being trolled and take things literally etc.
The difference is that RM still takes himself very seriously, whereas you actually lost the long term war of attrition and accepted a self image that says you're a pathetic retarded loser.
You aren't actually thick skinned, you're just already defeated and numb to it. RM is thin skinned but he manages to have a good self-image anyway.
It is the tenth largest economy and has an actual 21st century healthcare system. Those are the upsides.
The down sides is that it is full of more SJW leftists than "lets add some real socialism" leftists and isn't socialist enough. It is also cold af and the prices are worse than in America.
Another upside is that a lot of Good rappers are from Canada like Golden BSP, Merkules, Madchild, Eazy Mac and Teo Laza.
Number one, I said that evil is defined as unnecessary harm in the last round.
Number two, not only did I "touch" his claim but he provided no basis for it and you are treating it as more valid than my claims by default even though it is retarded and baseless at face value.
I hate how the concept of BOP is treated in debates. It is literally just an excuse to be biased. If two people make a claim, one must go to greater lengths to prove it and the other can simply say stupid shit and be right by default because person number one made the initial proposition.
How can you rationally justify seeing two people debating where one says that supporting genocide and slavery is evil and the other says "nuh uh because he said so" and voting for the latter?
You pretended as if I had all the BOP and was wrong by default, but con was making a claim too. An incredibly stupid claim and one that required just as much backing as mine. You treated him as correct by default because you are either retarded or you wanted me to lose. Those are the only two possible explanations.
I will only get angry and hold a grudge if you seem like you're trying to make me lose instead of giving an honest vote or if your vote is stupid.
Before you usually voted in my favor and reported votes that harmed my chances of winning and now you're doing the opposite. It's legitimately suspicious.
That makes no sense. I was logical and he was illogical. I was right and he was wrong.
Also the BOP isn't all on me just because I made the proposition when the opponent is making claims. You're acting as if Con's appeal to authority doesn't have BOP when it does.
Our definitions were clear. It was an appeal to authority VS evil being defined as unnecessary harm. One definition is retarded and the other makes a lot of sense and I think you're smart enough to know which is which. Therefore I conclude that you want me to lose out of spite.
You're admitting you don't have time to analyze the debate or the situation properly but you're still sucking RM's dick when you should stay out of something you don't have time to analyze.
You can't take even a fraction of what you dish out. All I have to say is "shut up" and you block me and hold it against me when you literally disrespected the shit out of me on discord.
You're a fucking pussy, you can go back to having me blocked and never interact with me or my debates again.
Lucky you, it looks like whiteflame is a biased piece of shit who eats out of the palm of your hand and you lost me a debate that I had every right to win. Best.Korea's arguments were fucking retarded compared to mine and you know it.
"I didn't murder them, because if I murdered them I would have done this, that's how I knew to avoid doing that so it didn't look like I murdered them after I murdered them".
I am reporting RationalMadman's vote as biased. He just voted against me in two debates immediately after blocking me.
"Pro never define his version of evil, not once in the entire debate."
I defined what I see as good and evil in the final round, RM is literally lying here.
"In Round 2, Pro concedes that Con is able to redefine evil to axiomatically pivot all good around God."
I made no such concession, and if God hating pleasure while supporting genocide, slavery and bigotry doesn't count as evil idk what to tell you. In what universe is "You're wrong because God says so" a stronger argument than that?
"On top of this, Pro forgot his BoP is to prove God is evil"
My arguments were clearly better than Con's and con has BP to prove his claim that everything God does is good because God, I am not the only one who made claims in this debate even though I made the proposition.
Your statement about the draft, prototype, goat, and trash pattern is dumb and incorrect. Particularly when it comes to the Legend of Zelda.
The Adventures of Link was a rushed sequel that was just made to keep the franchise relevant and is structured more like a primitive yet cookie-cutter/generic RPG more so than a real Zelda game. Ocarina of Time, Majora's mask,, Wind Waker and especially Twilight Princess were all superior games to the older ones and only the nostalgia of a few old school game fans says otherwise.
I'll admit Skyward Sword was lacking and the most recent ones use too many generic-feeling RPG mechanics but they are far from "trash".
Alright I'm quitting this site now. I know ya'll ain't gonna miss me. Enjoy your biased mods RM.
I report RMs vote for ignoring anything relating to diet and giving argument/conduct/grammar points for something that is solely a conduct issue.
RM thinks diet is "arbitrary" even though it is a scientific fact that diet impacts health, he is an idiot and his vote shouldn't be allowed.
Whatever, people have had better votes deleted by mods.
If I quit the site over my rating it will be because I feel like everyone else is biased/stupid rather than being ashamed for my own sake.
Go starve and under-hydrate yourself bitch.
I hereby report Underdog's vote for cherry picking one thing to bitch about and not addressing 99.999% of the debate.
You are a push over...you're pushed over the edge into a fit of rage at the slightest hint nonconformity to your fascist RM regime.
Why do you block me and then try to talk to me?
I'll unblock you so you can accept this debate but then I will block you again because you still have me blocked.
Everyone who doesn't vote on this is a homosexual black man.
You really never shut up for someone who wants to keep me blocked.
I'll still get mad ngl
We should be going for songs that embody the emotion of anger and rage, so both angles could work depending on how well they embody it.
The funny thing about agnosticism is that it is equally likely to be the position of those who think about whether God exists the least and those who think about it the most.
Eight trigrams 64 facepalms.
Now now, you're both super abused and super affected by abuse and whatnot. Stop arguing over who is more abused and get on with your lives.
Hurry up and post a fucking verse.
He knew he was trolling, you voted for a troll position and made up stupid excuses for it because you're such a bitch that me telling you to "shut up" actually offended you.
I let you rip me a new ass hole because I thought you were just being honest and trying to help, but now I see how fucked up you are for dishing out so much and taking so little.
Everything you say is an excuse to be retarded. "If you type things in a debate, they default to true even with 0 proof. Unless it's what Fishchaser says."
"If you are sarcastic and I know you're being sarcastic, then I can pick and choose how I interpret it and say you conceded when you didn't because being unbiased actually means being biased."
That doesn't mean "Christianity is true by default" though. You're just spouting nonsense to justify your biased vote.
You're literally stupid.
When judging rapists and murderers, we should default to the ethics of rapists and murderers"
You're stupid, I can't believe I considered you intelligent.
If you default to Christian ethics you are accepting Christianity as true by default because Christian ethics are part of Christianity you stupid piece of shit. You are the one being biased and I no longer consider you intelligent for saying that.
Maybe Con would be able to win if it wasn't an objective fact that the Christian God is evil by any reasonable definition of the word. It is also possible for him to win thanks to biased people and retards, both of which describe you.
You're treating Christianity as right by default then, it's too late to say you aren't either retarded, biased or both.
You discovered his secret. He has a degradation kink and he was trauma bonded to Lancelot. He used to touch himself to Lancelot's abuse and he cried for 3 weeks when Lancelot was banned. He sometimes wears his mother's panties while fantasizing about Lancelot spanking him and calling him mean names.
I'll dissect em' in the rectum and eject cum on their breasts, I'm on the spectrum.
It's more calling it like I see it than defending.
I agree that he's thin skinned, but his self-image and self esteem is actually better than yours in spite of it. That's just the way it is.
You need to focus on attacking your own insecurities, you are a whole different kind of thin skinned.
RM needs to get over himself and you need to get yourself over your insecurities.
You and RM are both autistic, both prone to hate being trolled and take things literally etc.
The difference is that RM still takes himself very seriously, whereas you actually lost the long term war of attrition and accepted a self image that says you're a pathetic retarded loser.
You aren't actually thick skinned, you're just already defeated and numb to it. RM is thin skinned but he manages to have a good self-image anyway.
BSP: 5/10
Merk: 6/10
Madchild: 4/10
Teo: 4/10 (he is only 22 and has the potential and time to improve)
Eazy Mac: 5/10
Sure, I'll vote on this. And don't worry I won't try to force a loss for you either.
He is the second best rapper here besides me. I am the best rapper to ever join a debate site.
It is the tenth largest economy and has an actual 21st century healthcare system. Those are the upsides.
The down sides is that it is full of more SJW leftists than "lets add some real socialism" leftists and isn't socialist enough. It is also cold af and the prices are worse than in America.
Another upside is that a lot of Good rappers are from Canada like Golden BSP, Merkules, Madchild, Eazy Mac and Teo Laza.
Number one, I said that evil is defined as unnecessary harm in the last round.
Number two, not only did I "touch" his claim but he provided no basis for it and you are treating it as more valid than my claims by default even though it is retarded and baseless at face value.
I hate how the concept of BOP is treated in debates. It is literally just an excuse to be biased. If two people make a claim, one must go to greater lengths to prove it and the other can simply say stupid shit and be right by default because person number one made the initial proposition.
How can you rationally justify seeing two people debating where one says that supporting genocide and slavery is evil and the other says "nuh uh because he said so" and voting for the latter?
You pretended as if I had all the BOP and was wrong by default, but con was making a claim too. An incredibly stupid claim and one that required just as much backing as mine. You treated him as correct by default because you are either retarded or you wanted me to lose. Those are the only two possible explanations.
I will only get angry and hold a grudge if you seem like you're trying to make me lose instead of giving an honest vote or if your vote is stupid.
Before you usually voted in my favor and reported votes that harmed my chances of winning and now you're doing the opposite. It's legitimately suspicious.
Me fucking everyone's gf is better than everyone fucking their own gf.
You are just trying to justify a biased vote. Your goal is for me to lose, not to be objective.
That makes no sense. I was logical and he was illogical. I was right and he was wrong.
Also the BOP isn't all on me just because I made the proposition when the opponent is making claims. You're acting as if Con's appeal to authority doesn't have BOP when it does.
Our definitions were clear. It was an appeal to authority VS evil being defined as unnecessary harm. One definition is retarded and the other makes a lot of sense and I think you're smart enough to know which is which. Therefore I conclude that you want me to lose out of spite.
I objectively should have won this debate. My opponents arguments were ridiculous and there is a good chance he even knows it and was trolling.
You're admitting you don't have time to analyze the debate or the situation properly but you're still sucking RM's dick when you should stay out of something you don't have time to analyze.
You can't take even a fraction of what you dish out. All I have to say is "shut up" and you block me and hold it against me when you literally disrespected the shit out of me on discord.
You're a fucking pussy, you can go back to having me blocked and never interact with me or my debates again.
Lucky you, it looks like whiteflame is a biased piece of shit who eats out of the palm of your hand and you lost me a debate that I had every right to win. Best.Korea's arguments were fucking retarded compared to mine and you know it.
"I didn't murder them, because if I murdered them I would have done this, that's how I knew to avoid doing that so it didn't look like I murdered them after I murdered them".
You're just trying to make sure I lose.
Con dropped my arguments, if the mods weren't corrupt they would leave Cronic's vote and delete yours.
I am reporting RationalMadman's vote as biased. He just voted against me in two debates immediately after blocking me.
"Pro never define his version of evil, not once in the entire debate."
I defined what I see as good and evil in the final round, RM is literally lying here.
"In Round 2, Pro concedes that Con is able to redefine evil to axiomatically pivot all good around God."
I made no such concession, and if God hating pleasure while supporting genocide, slavery and bigotry doesn't count as evil idk what to tell you. In what universe is "You're wrong because God says so" a stronger argument than that?
"On top of this, Pro forgot his BoP is to prove God is evil"
My arguments were clearly better than Con's and con has BP to prove his claim that everything God does is good because God, I am not the only one who made claims in this debate even though I made the proposition.
You vote based on a combination of which songs are better and which songs are more similar to the debater in question.
They added 3D environments.
They all have different styles and themes.
Majora's Mask added the whole mask shapeshifting thing.
Twilight Princess has a more fleshed out combat system than any of the games before it.
There's more, but I agree that Link to the Past is a very good game.
No, Twilight Princess is technically a superior game and my personal favorite.
Why do you think Link to the Past is the goat?
Your statement about the draft, prototype, goat, and trash pattern is dumb and incorrect. Particularly when it comes to the Legend of Zelda.
The Adventures of Link was a rushed sequel that was just made to keep the franchise relevant and is structured more like a primitive yet cookie-cutter/generic RPG more so than a real Zelda game. Ocarina of Time, Majora's mask,, Wind Waker and especially Twilight Princess were all superior games to the older ones and only the nostalgia of a few old school game fans says otherwise.
I'll admit Skyward Sword was lacking and the most recent ones use too many generic-feeling RPG mechanics but they are far from "trash".