Goldtop

How do you know what I WANT?

Really?? You think I know anything about mathematics? It is purely hypothetical.

You have, I haven't.

Then, that decision is not based on anything logical or reasonable, it is something that you personally want as opposed to what's real. So yes, it has to be discarded.

I look at the solar system and it doesn't look natural or accidental. 

You don't have a case. 

That's assuming it wants to be known to everyone.

put's it's signature in a mathematics formula

But we don't know what God wants.

How would you even know God exists? What evidence do you possess that has made you believe God exists in the first place?

Supreme Being

It's right there in the definition you posted.

Did you not read my post or not understand it? Truth does not have God in the definition, God does not have truth in the definition. God is not truth, truth is not God. Please tell me you understood this?

It is simply The Truth. It speaks for itself.

You don't know Truth so you are blind to what is evident.

You profess to believe in physics. You know what energy is. What happens to the whole universe if there is no energy? 

But it goes deeper than that even. The Ultimate Reality has all authority. If something doesn't exist in Truth, it doesn't exist.

Maybe you should go back and read the answers again or consider the fact that materialists don't know what consciousness is,

When I say God, I mean the ultimate reality, and the dictionary backs me up.

By far and away, the weakest argument made yet.

You should win an award for that.

Again, this is if you are of the opinion that every single claim of the supernatural is a negative. Remember, technically only one needs to be true for there to be something to it.

Unfortunately, not one has ever been shown to be true, so there is no evidence to date, let alone proof.

In the case with God we have more than a couple of "delusional" claims by liars and far from it, and we have more testimonial and documented evidence for spirituality than any one could ever study in a lifetime.

There is no other single subject with such a vast array of observation, evidences, literature and experience/knowledge available.

Again, we only rely on testimonial based evidence (as opposed to physical evidence) because of the NATURE of the Creator, the nature of souls, so it is not that anything is lacking, rather the nature of spirituality naturally eliminates the method of a materialistic study which leaves personal observation and experience.

On top of that, everyone seems to ignore the fact this supposed absurd claim (which amounts to believing in gnomes) has been debated and considered by the most prominent philosophers and even scientific minded people for generations. That is due to the fact that the concept of a Creator is not comparable to believing in gnomes.

If they had it their way, we would all be silenced.

Because you won't beleive unless you experience God for yourself. 

Look at you speaking for everyone.

Look at you speaking for no one.

You might as well be arguing that. the sun is made of ice.

There is nothing about this particular subject that can be debated.

This is a debate forum, why are you here if you have no intention of debating?

You would be better off confessing the truth.

I am being honest with myself

Not even remotely.

Like I said, it's futile to try to argue with an atheist about God.

That's just a lame excuse for not wanting to be honest with yourself. Probably a good thread question, "Why can't believers be honest with themselves"?

You prove the point of my thread.

And, you prove my point of not being honest with yourself about being mistaken, lying or delusional.  You haven't even bothered, just like you've never bothered to form an argument about God. That's three strikes against you.

If a decision is free of influence, it is indistinguishable from random.

Human experience is fundamentally subjective.

Like I said, there is no way to convince atheists. I rest my case.

God has obviously decided to remain anonymous to some people. That's between you and God.

Even if out of the millions of claims

Suddenly, it's millions of claims? The problem with any number of claims is consistency, no two claims are alike, hence we can assume it's all in their heads.

An expert in any field can usually make snap decisions based on their experience and training.

Experience and training is axiomatically considered "previous influence".

The fact that you are able to make a decision without planning ahead does not mean it is not influenced by previous events.

I'm not sure what you're trying to argue here, but I'll grant you some slack.

humans are fundamentally subjective

You seem to be suggesting that our universe is viewed identically by all observers throughout history and this is simply not the case.

Even science itself is subject to variation, change and interpretation.

It is logically impossible to make a decision that is free from previous influence.

and everyone knows it.

Yes, everyone knows you're wrong, that's why you have to constantly repeat yourself over and over with the same false claims, you're doing it on this thread alone. No one with a brain in their head agrees with you.

You don't know what evidence is and apparently can't read

I understand evidence just fine, you are the one who doesn't, you have made evidently clear by using religious testimonials as evidence for the existence of something. That is entirely false and is NEVER used as such.

The evidence required to validate the existence of something is hard evidence, physical objects, direct proof, a thing or things, which is exactly what the definition states. You have ignored all of that, so it clearly is you who can't read.

the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

A thing or set of things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment:

The means by which an allegation may be proven, such as oral testimony, documents, or physical objects.

broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion.[1] This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion.

In law, rules of evidence govern the types of evidence that are admissible in a legal proceeding. Types of legal evidence include testimony, documentary evidence,[2] and physical evidence.

Human experience is fundamentally subjective. 

Yet your foundational position is that there is no truth